• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较使用移位线和氯化铝糊的随机对照临床试验。

A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords and aluminum chloride paste.

机构信息

Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Pro Vice Chancellor Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Jun;32(4):410-415. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12581. Epub 2020 May 22.

DOI:10.1111/jerd.12581
PMID:32442353
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This clinical study measured the change in opening and height of the displaced gingiva using paste and cord retraction materials for definitive impression making of natural teeth and assessed if they were comparable and clinically acceptable.

METHODS

Impressions of 4 maxilla premolars from 10 participants were taken using a split-mouth protocol. All participants were free of periodontal disease, had a thick biotype, a minimal of 3 mm height of keratinized gingival tissue and gingival sulci depths of 2 mm. The bleeding index (BI), gingival index (GI) plaque index (PI), sulcular depth, level of attachment and tooth sensitivity were recorded at baseline, just after retraction, at 24 hours and at 2 weeks. Impressions were poured in stone and then after initial analysis were cross-sectioned to allow measurements of the gingival height change and gap size to be recorded.

RESULTS

The paste produced a slightly smaller gap compared to the cord (0.041 mm less, P = .014) whilst the mean displacement for the cord was 0.282 mm and paste was 0.241 mm respectively. Gingival height with the paste was 0.047 mm lower than that achieved by the cord (P = .208).

CONCLUSIONS

Cord and paste retraction produced comparable clinically acceptable gingival gaps, with the cord producing statistically larger gap size.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The cord and paste retraction materials produced comparable clinically acceptable gingival retraction.

摘要

目的

本临床研究通过糊剂和缝线两种收缩材料对天然牙进行最终印模制取,测量移位牙龈的开口度和高度的变化,并评估其是否具有可比性和临床可接受性。

方法

采用分口方案对 10 名参与者的 4 颗上颌前磨牙进行了印模制取。所有参与者均无牙周病,具有厚的生物型,角化龈组织高度至少为 3mm,牙龈沟深度为 2mm。在基线、收缩后即刻、24 小时和 2 周时记录出血指数(BI)、牙龈指数(GI)、菌斑指数(PI)、龈沟深度、附着水平和牙齿敏感度。制取印模后用石腊灌注,然后进行初步分析,再将其横截,以记录牙龈高度变化和间隙大小。

结果

糊剂产生的间隙比缝线略小(小 0.041mm,P =.014),而缝线的平均移位量为 0.282mm,糊剂为 0.241mm。使用糊剂时的牙龈高度比使用缝线时低 0.047mm(P =.208)。

结论

缝线和糊剂收缩均可产生临床可接受的、具有可比性的牙龈间隙,缝线在统计学上产生的间隙更大。

临床意义

缝线和糊剂收缩材料均可产生临床可接受的、具有可比性的牙龈收缩效果。

相似文献

1
A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords and aluminum chloride paste.一项比较使用移位线和氯化铝糊的随机对照临床试验。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Jun;32(4):410-415. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12581. Epub 2020 May 22.
2
A multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords, an aluminum chloride paste, and a combination of paste and cords for tissue displacement.一项多中心随机对照临床试验,比较了使用移位线、氯化铝糊剂以及糊剂联合移位线进行组织移位的效果。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Jan;119(1):82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 May 5.
3
A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality.关于临床性能和印模质量的无绳和传统移位系统的临床比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 May;111(5):388-94. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
4
Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.不同牙龈退缩材料对龈沟宽度影响的疗效评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Mar 1;14(2):217-21. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1302.
5
Influence of gingival retraction paste versus cord on periodontal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.牙龈收缩膏与龈线对牙周健康的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Quintessence Int. 2019;50(3):234-244. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a41976.
6
Effect of gingival displacement cord and cordless systems on the closure, displacement, and inflammation of the gingival crevice.牙龈排龈线和无排龈线系统对龈沟封闭、移位及炎症的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Feb;115(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.023. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
7
Evaluation of Effectiveness of Three New Gingival Retraction Systems: A Comparative Study.三种新型牙龈牵引系统有效性的评估:一项对照研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Aug 1;22(8):922-927.
8
Evaluation of Gingival Displacement with Aluminum Chloride and Naphazoline Hydrochloride: A Randomized Controlled Trial.评价氯化铝和盐酸萘甲唑啉对牙龈移位的作用:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2021 Feb 25;29(1):47-53. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2066Junior10.
9
Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.不同牙龈移位材料在控制牙龈沟宽度中的疗效:一项对比研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Jun 1;22(6):703-706.
10
A clinical study on the effects of cordless and conventional retraction techniques on the gingival and periodontal health.一项关于无线和传统牵拉技术对牙龈及牙周健康影响的临床研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Dec;35(12):1053-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01335.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Gingival Displacement in the Vertical and Horizontal Dimension under the Condition of Mild Gingivitis-A Randomized Clinical Study.轻度牙龈炎条件下垂直和水平维度的牙龈移位——一项随机临床研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 15;11(2):437. doi: 10.3390/jcm11020437.
2
Influence of the Gingival Condition on the Performance of Different Gingival Displacement Methods-A Randomized Clinical Study.牙龈状况对不同牙龈排龈方法效果的影响——一项随机临床研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 22;10(13):2747. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132747.