Suppr超能文献

仍想提供帮助?人际协调对24小时延迟后的帮助行为的影响。

Still want to help? Interpersonal coordination's effects on helping behaviour after a 24 hour delay.

作者信息

Cross Liam, Michael John, Wilsdon Luke, Henson Agnes, Atherton Gray

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Edge Hill University, Liverpool L39 4QP, UK.

Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 May;206:103062. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103062. Epub 2020 May 19.

Abstract

A fast-growing literature is establishing how moving in time together has pro-social consequences, though no work to date has explored the persistence of these effects over time. Across two studies, people who had previously performed coordinated movements were over three times more likely to give their time to help their co-actor when asked 24 hours later than those who had performed a similar but uncoordinated task. Findings showed that group-level categorisation, but not social affiliation, partially mediated helping behaviour. This provides preliminary evidence that the pro-social effects of coordination are sustainable over a longer period than previously reported, and that the effects of coordination upon pro-social motivation may be more related to changes in group level categorisations than increased social affiliations.

摘要

越来越多的文献表明,同步行动会产生亲社会的结果,不过迄今为止还没有研究探讨这些影响随时间的持续性。在两项研究中,与那些执行了类似但不协调任务的人相比,之前进行过协调动作的人在24小时后被请求时,拿出时间帮助共同行动者的可能性要高出三倍多。研究结果表明,群体层面的分类而非社会归属在一定程度上介导了帮助行为。这提供了初步证据,表明协调的亲社会效应在比之前报道的更长时间内是可持续的,并且协调对亲社会动机的影响可能更多地与群体层面分类的变化有关,而非社会归属的增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验