Suppr超能文献

短暂的知觉体验和不看就能回忆的可能性。

Fleeting Perceptual Experience and the Possibility of Recalling Without Seeing.

机构信息

Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.

South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 May 22;10(1):8540. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64843-2.

Abstract

We explore an intensely debated problem in neuroscience, psychology and philosophy: the degree to which the "phenomenological consciousness" of the experience of a stimulus is separable from the "access consciousness" of its reportability. Specifically, it has been proposed that these two measures are dissociated from one another in one, or both directions. However, even if it was agreed that reportability and experience were doubly dissociated, the limits of dissociation logic mean we would not be able to conclusively separate the cognitive processes underlying the two. We take advantage of computational modelling and recent advances in state-trace analysis to assess this dissociation in an attentional/experiential blink paradigm. These advances in state-trace analysis make use of Bayesian statistics to quantify the evidence for and against a dissociation. Further evidence is obtained by linking our finding to a prominent model of the attentional blink - the Simultaneous Type/Serial Token model. Our results show evidence for a dissociation between experience and reportability, whereby participants appear able to encode stimuli into working memory with little, if any, conscious experience of them. This raises the possibility of a phenomenon that might be called sight-blind recall, which we discuss in the context of the current experience/reportability debate.

摘要

我们探讨了神经科学、心理学和哲学中一个极具争议的问题:刺激的“现象意识”与其可报告性的“访问意识”在多大程度上可以分离。具体来说,有人提出,这两种衡量标准在一个或两个方向上彼此分离。然而,即使人们同意可报告性和体验是双重分离的,分离逻辑的局限性意味着我们无法最终将这两种体验背后的认知过程分离开来。我们利用计算建模和状态追踪分析的最新进展,在注意力/体验眨眼范式中评估这种分离。这些状态追踪分析的进展利用贝叶斯统计来量化支持和反对分离的证据。通过将我们的发现与注意力眨眼的一个突出模型——同时类型/串行令牌模型联系起来,我们获得了进一步的证据。我们的结果表明,体验和可报告性之间存在分离,参与者似乎能够将刺激编码到工作记忆中,而几乎没有或根本没有对它们的意识体验。这就提出了一种可能被称为“视而不见的回忆”的现象,我们将在当前的体验/可报告性辩论的背景下讨论这种现象。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ea1/7244573/1699666fc223/41598_2020_64843_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验