减重手术后体重反弹:使用大型参考样本进行系统文献回顾和研究间比较。
Weight regain after bariatric surgery: a systematic literature review and comparison across studies using a large reference sample.
机构信息
Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
出版信息
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Aug;16(8):1133-1144. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.03.034. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
Published estimates of weight regain (WR) after bariatric surgery vary greatly. Understanding the sources of variability in the literature and clarifying the magnitude of WR after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are critical for informing expectations and planning interventions. A literature search through January 2019 yielded 15 English-language studies that reported WR in at least 30 participants, not selected based on weight loss or WR, at least 3 years after primary RYGB (n = 11) or SG (n = 5). Median follow-up was 5.0 (range, 3.2-10.0) years. Median sample size was 62 (range, 33-464). Samples represented a median of 54.3% (range, 10.7%-100%) of eligible participants. Nadir weight was determined by serial research assessments (n = 1), medical records (n = 7), participant recall (n = 4), or an undisclosed method (n = 4). Three continuous and 8 binary WR measures (the latter, based on various thresholds for clinically meaningful WR) were reported. To enable comparison across studies, the percentage difference in WR in each study versus a reference sample (n = 1433 RYGB), matched on time since surgery and WR measure, was calculated. Median WR in the reference sample increased from 8.2 (25th-75th percentile: 0-19.5) to 23.8 (25th-75th percentile: 9.0-33.9) percent of maximum weight lost, 3 to 6 years post RYGB surgery. Studies of RYGB versus SG, with larger versus smaller samples, with higher versus lower participation rates, that determined nadir weight via participant recall versus medical records, and reported continuous versus binary WR measures tended to have WR values closer to the reference sample and each other. Variation in WR estimates was explained by heterogeneity in WR measures, timing of assessment, surgical procedure, and study design characteristics. The best estimate of WR after RYGB likely comes from the large reference sample. WR after SG versus RYGB appears higher. However, additional high-quality studies with uniform reporting of WR by surgical procedure are needed.
发表的减重手术后体重反弹(WR)估计值差异很大。了解文献中变异的来源,并澄清 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)和袖状胃切除术(SG)后的 WR 幅度,对于告知预期和规划干预措施至关重要。通过 2019 年 1 月的文献检索,获得了 15 项英文研究报告,这些研究报告至少有 30 名参与者在 RYGB(n = 11)或 SG(n = 5)后至少 3 年进行了至少 3 次体重减轻或 WR 不选择的研究,报告了 WR。中位随访时间为 5.0 年(范围为 3.2-10.0 年)。中位样本量为 62(范围为 33-464)。样本代表合格参与者的中位数为 54.3%(范围为 10.7%-100%)。最低点体重通过连续研究评估(n = 1),病历(n = 7),参与者回忆(n = 4)或未公开的方法(n = 4)确定。报告了三种连续和八种二进制 WR 测量值(后者基于临床意义上 WR 的各种阈值)。为了能够在研究之间进行比较,计算了每个研究与参考样本(n = 1433 RYGB)之间 WR 差异的百分比,该参考样本根据手术时间和 WR 测量值进行了匹配。参考样本中 WR 的中位数从 RYGB 手术后 3 至 6 年的 8.2%(25 百分位至 75 百分位:0-19.5)增加到 23.8%(25 百分位至 75 百分位:9.0-33.9)最大体重减轻的百分比。RYGB 与 SG 的研究,样本较大与较小,参与率较高与较低,通过参与者回忆而非病历确定最低点体重,以及报告连续与二进制 WR 测量值的研究,WR 值更接近参考样本和彼此。WR 估计值的变化可归因于 WR 测量值,评估时间,手术程序和研究设计特征的异质性。RYGB 后 WR 的最佳估计值可能来自于大型参考样本。RYGB 后 SG 与 RYGB 的 WR 似乎更高。但是,还需要更多具有统一报告 WR 手术程序的高质量研究。