• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛门直肠镜辅助微创手术(ARAMIS)的评估:一种新的经肛门手术平台

An evaluation of trans-anal rectoscopic-assisted minimally invasive surgery (ARAMIS): a new platform for transanal surgery.

作者信息

Polese Lino, Rizzato Roberto, Porzionato Andrea, Da Dalt Gianfranco, Bressan Alice, De Caro Raffaele, Merigliano Stefano

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Section of Surgery, University of Padova, Clinica Chirurgica 3^, Sesto Piano Policlinico, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.

Department of Neuroscience, Section of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Sep;35(9):1681-1687. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03641-8. Epub 2020 May 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-020-03641-8
PMID:32447482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7415033/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a new trans-anal rectoscopic-assisted minimally invasive surgery (ARAMIS) platform to treat rectal lesions.

METHODS

ARAMIS was first compared with two transanal minimally invasive surgery platforms (SILS Port and GelPOINT Path) on human cadavers. Surgeons with different experience performed running sutures at different distances, at four quadrants, using the three platforms and gave a score to visibility, safety, and maneuverability. ARAMIS was then utilized on patients affected with rectal neoplasia who met the inclusion criteria. Patients and tumor characteristic and results were prospectively collected. The follow-up examinations included proctoscopy at 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

According to surgeons' scores, ARAMIS improves visibility and safety with respect to other platforms for distances beyond 10 cm. The procedure, which lasted an average of 59 min, was successfully carried out in 14 patients. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. The mean tumor size was 3 cm; they were located a mean of 11 cm from the anal verge. Complete removal of the lesion was possible in 13/14 patients. There was one case of adenoma recurrence at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Study results showed that ARAMIS, which is equipped with an adjustable rectoscope, can be considered a safe, effective platform for transanal surgery. The rectoscope protects the rectum during the procedure, a particularly important consideration when proximal rectal lesions are being treated. Further clinical studies are warranted to confirm these encouraging results.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估一种新型经肛门直肠镜辅助微创手术(ARAMIS)平台治疗直肠病变的可行性和安全性。

方法

首先在人体尸体上对ARAMIS与两种经肛门微创手术平台(SILS Port和GelPOINT Path)进行比较。不同经验的外科医生使用这三种平台在四个象限不同距离处进行连续缝合,并对视野、安全性和可操作性进行评分。然后将ARAMIS应用于符合纳入标准的直肠肿瘤患者。前瞻性收集患者和肿瘤特征及结果。随访检查包括在3个月、6个月和12个月时进行直肠镜检查。

结果

根据外科医生的评分,对于距离超过10 cm的情况,ARAMIS在视野和安全性方面优于其他平台。该手术平均持续59分钟,14例患者手术成功完成。未报告术中或术后并发症。肿瘤平均大小为3 cm;平均距离肛缘11 cm。14例患者中有13例病变完全切除。随访中有1例腺瘤复发。

结论

研究结果表明,配备可调节直肠镜的ARAMIS可被视为一种安全、有效的经肛门手术平台。直肠镜在手术过程中可保护直肠,在治疗直肠近端病变时这是一个特别重要的考虑因素。需要进一步的临床研究来证实这些令人鼓舞的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/833b/7415033/cd573f9436ba/384_2020_3641_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/833b/7415033/0c7c1d0cf799/384_2020_3641_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/833b/7415033/569a438085e9/384_2020_3641_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/833b/7415033/cd573f9436ba/384_2020_3641_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/833b/7415033/0c7c1d0cf799/384_2020_3641_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/833b/7415033/569a438085e9/384_2020_3641_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/833b/7415033/cd573f9436ba/384_2020_3641_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An evaluation of trans-anal rectoscopic-assisted minimally invasive surgery (ARAMIS): a new platform for transanal surgery.经肛门直肠镜辅助微创手术(ARAMIS)的评估:一种新的经肛门手术平台
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Sep;35(9):1681-1687. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03641-8. Epub 2020 May 24.
2
Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients.经肛门微创手术(TAMIS)用于良性肿瘤和早期直肠癌的局部切除:50 例患者的疗效和结果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Mar;56(3):301-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827ca313.
3
[A comparison of colonoscopy - assisted transanal minimally invasive surgery via glove port and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of early rectal tumors].[经手套端口结肠镜辅助经肛门微创手术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期直肠肿瘤的比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 25;22(7):656-661. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.07.010.
4
First clinical experience with single-port robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (SP rTAMIS) for benign rectal neoplasms.首例经肛门单孔机器人微创外科手术(SP rTAMIS)治疗直肠良性肿瘤的临床经验。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Jan;25(1):117-124. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02358-8. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
5
Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery: a single institutional experience.经肛门机器人微创手术:单机构经验。
Updates Surg. 2022 Jun;74(3):1011-1016. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01233-x. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
6
Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Benign and Malignant Rectal Lesions: Operative and Oncological Outcomes of a Single Center Experience.经肛门微创手术治疗良性和恶性直肠病变:单中心经验的手术及肿瘤学结果
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Sep;29(9):1122-1127. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0329. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
7
Robotic Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Excision of Rectal Neoplasia: Clinical Experience With 58 Consecutive Patients.经肛门机器人微创手术切除直肠肿瘤:58 例连续患者的临床经验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Mar;62(3):279-285. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001223.
8
Trans-anal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM): a comparative case-control matched-pairs analysis.经肛门微创手术(TAMIS)与经肛门内镜微创手术(TEM):一项病例对照配对分析比较。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):2081-2086. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08494-y. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
9
[Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumor].经肛门微创手术治疗直肠神经内分泌肿瘤
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2018 Dec;45(13):2333-2335.
10
Pushing the Limits of Local Excision for Rectal Cancer: Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) for Rectal Cancer Using the Port-in-Port Technique.挑战直肠癌局部切除的极限:采用端口入端口技术的经肛门微创手术(TAMIS)治疗直肠癌
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;23(3):918. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4978-1. Epub 2015 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Removal of a large rectal polyp with endoscopic submucosal dissection-trans-anal rectoscopic assisted minimally invasive surgery hybrid technique: A case report.经肛门直肠镜辅助内镜下黏膜剥离微创手术混合技术切除大型直肠息肉:病例报告
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec 27;15(12):2932-2937. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2932.
2
Meniscus regeneration by 3D printing technologies: Current advances and future perspectives.3D打印技术用于半月板再生:当前进展与未来展望
J Tissue Eng. 2022 Jan 25;13:20417314211065860. doi: 10.1177/20417314211065860. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Rectal Cancer, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.直肠癌临床实践指南(NCCN 肿瘤学版)2018 年第 2 版
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Jul;16(7):874-901. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0061.
2
Quality of Local Excision for Rectal Neoplasms Using Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Versus Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Multi-institutional Matched Analysis.经肛门内镜显微手术与经肛门微创手术治疗直肠肿瘤的局部切除质量:多机构匹配分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Sep;60(9):928-935. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000884.
3
Transanal Endoscopic Operation Versus Conventional Transanal Excision for Rectal Tumors: Case-Matched Study with Propensity Score Matching.
经肛门内镜手术与传统经肛门切除术治疗直肠肿瘤的比较:倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究
World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2387-2394. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4017-4.
4
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery: is one technique superior?经肛门内镜显微手术与经肛门微创手术:一种技术更具优势吗?
Am J Surg. 2016 Dec;212(6):1063-1067. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.017. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
5
Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: Review of Indications and Outcomes from 75 Consecutive Patients.经肛门微创手术:75 例连续患者的适应证和结果回顾。
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 May;222(5):814-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
6
Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma: short-term outcomes and experience after 80 cases.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:80例患者的短期疗效及经验
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):464-470. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4221-y. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
7
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus standard transanal excision for the removal of rectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经肛门内镜显微手术与标准经肛门切除术治疗直肠肿瘤的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Feb;58(2):254-61. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000309.
8
Local excision for early stage rectal cancer in patients over age 65 years: 2000-2009.2000 - 2009年65岁以上患者早期直肠癌的局部切除术
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Feb;58(2):172-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000279.
9
A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013.2010年至2013年经肛门微创手术(TAMIS)的系统评价。
Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Sep;18(9):775-88. doi: 10.1007/s10151-014-1148-6. Epub 2014 May 7.
10
Practice patterns and long-term survival for early-stage rectal cancer.早期直肠癌的治疗模式和长期生存情况。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec 1;31(34):4276-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.1860. Epub 2013 Oct 28.