Department of Biomedicine and Veterinary Public Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7028, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Arch Toxicol. 2020 Aug;94(8):2769-2784. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02783-6. Epub 2020 May 23.
The water framework directive re-evaluation proposes the integration of effect-based tools, increasing the need for alternative methods. Especially within aquatic toxicology, coverage of specific toxicity pathways is scarce, and most applications are based on mammalian or bacterial models, not reflecting realistic exposure scenarios. The use of transient reporter gene assays in cells from organisms of interest could be a quick and inexpensive solution. However, interference with cellular homeostasis may impact the system beyond the function of the manipulated gene and thus lead to non-specific results. We describe how varying vector geometry and different regulatory gene elements on plasmids used for transfection in zebrafish hepatocytes and embryonic fibroblasts may lead up to a tenfold difference in potency. Cells were transiently co-transfected with an Nrf2-responsive Firefly luciferase reporter plasmid and eight different Renilla luciferase normalization plasmids. Transfected cells were exposed to two different regimes (0.1-100 µM and 7.8-250 µM) of the oxidative stress-inducing compounds, sulforaphane, tertbutylhydroquinone, and metazachlor. Nrf2 activity was measured in dual-luciferase assays. In parallel, cytotoxicity was assessed for different endpoints (energy metabolism, protein amount, membrane stability, and cell proliferation) in non-transfected cells and cells co-transfected with constructs of increasing size, to be used for normalization. Transfected cells were more susceptible to cytotoxicity in a vector size-dependent manner. Conclusively, we report that vector geometries (size, backbones, gene-regulatory units), cell line (tissue origin), applied transfection methods, and signal normalization may alter the sensitivity of reporter bioassays in a synergistic manner. Further, we propose that thorough bioassay design is needed to ensure reliability and regulatory acceptance.
水框架指令重新评估提议整合基于效应的工具,这增加了对替代方法的需求。特别是在水生毒理学领域,特定毒性途径的覆盖范围很少,并且大多数应用基于哺乳动物或细菌模型,不能反映现实暴露情况。在感兴趣的生物体的细胞中使用瞬时报告基因测定可能是一种快速且廉价的解决方案。然而,细胞内稳态的干扰可能会超出所操纵基因的功能影响系统,从而导致非特异性结果。我们描述了在斑马鱼肝细胞和胚胎成纤维细胞中转染时使用的质粒中不同的载体几何形状和不同的调控基因元件如何导致效力差异达十倍。瞬时共转染 Nrf2 反应性萤火虫荧光素酶报告质粒和 8 种不同的海肾荧光素酶归一化质粒。将转染的细胞暴露于两种不同的氧化应激诱导化合物(萝卜硫素、叔丁基对苯二酚和甲草氯)的处理条件下(0.1-100 µM 和 7.8-250 µM)。在双荧光素酶测定中测量 Nrf2 活性。同时,对于不同的终点(能量代谢、蛋白质含量、膜稳定性和细胞增殖),评估非转染细胞和共转染构建体大小逐渐增大的细胞的细胞毒性,以用于归一化。转染细胞以载体大小依赖性方式更容易受到细胞毒性的影响。总之,我们报告说载体几何形状(大小、骨架、基因调控单元)、细胞系(组织来源)、应用的转染方法和信号归一化可能以协同方式改变报告生物测定的敏感性。此外,我们建议需要进行彻底的生物测定设计,以确保可靠性和监管部门的接受。