Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, Reino Unido.
Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, Reino Unido.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2020 Oct;44(8):549-553. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2020.01.011. Epub 2020 May 22.
To develop a suprapubic catheter (SPC) training model as no specific realistic training model exists to replicate SPC exchange where a catheter tract is present.
We describe a novel, anatomically realistic, animal simulator model for use in SPC training, which was trialed at a national urology simulation boot camp by new urology trainees and validated by expert urologists. A scale reproduction of an abdominal wall was created using a porcine abdominal wall. A segment of small bowel was stitched around a size 16F Foley catheter to form a tract. Abdominal wall tissue was excised cylindrically to create an opening, and the small bowel tract was passed through the abdominal wall and sutured anteriorly, producing a realistic SPC tract: inferiorly, the tract was anastomosed to a porcine urinary bladder. This model was evaluated by 10 expert urologists for content validity with an 8-item 5-point rating scale used to evaluate domains relevant to the simulator.
The domains were scored between 1 and 5 by 10 expert urologists, 1 being «strongly disagree» and 5 being «strongly agree». The average expert ratings of the domains were then calculated and tabulated following the training course. There was an average global rating of 4.2/5 for the model, with an average usefulness for training score of 4.6/5.
The feedback from experts and trainees (informal) was overwhelmingly positive. On average, our experts reported high satisfaction with their experience using this simulator as a training tool.
开发耻骨上导管 (SPC) 培训模型,因为目前不存在可复制存在导管通道的 SPC 更换的特定现实培训模型。
我们描述了一种新的、解剖学逼真的动物模拟模型,可用于 SPC 培训,该模型在全国泌尿外科模拟训练营中由新的泌尿外科受训人员试用,并由专家泌尿科医生验证。使用猪的腹壁创建了腹壁的比例复制品。将一小段小肠缝合在 16F Foley 导管周围形成通道。腹壁组织被圆柱形切除以形成开口,小肠通道穿过腹壁并在前部缝合,形成逼真的 SPC 通道:下方,通道与猪的膀胱吻合。该模型由 10 名专家泌尿科医生进行内容有效性评估,使用 8 项 5 分制评分量表评估与模拟器相关的领域。
10 名专家泌尿科医生对这 8 个领域的评分在 1 到 5 之间,1 表示“强烈不同意”,5 表示“强烈同意”。然后计算并列出专家在培训课程后的平均领域评分。该模型的平均总体评分为 4.2/5,培训评分的平均有用性为 4.6/5。
专家和受训人员(非正式)的反馈是压倒性的积极。平均而言,我们的专家报告说,他们对使用这种模拟器作为培训工具的体验非常满意。