Pereira Gabriel Tensol Rodrigues, Dallan Luis Augusto P, Vergara-Martel Armando, Alaiti Mohamad Amer, Bezerra Hiram Grando
The Valve & Structural Heart Disease Intervention Center, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
The Valve & Structural Heart Disease Intervention Center, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 Jan;22:44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 14.
The rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR) has become increasingly prevalent with the exponential growth in stent implantation due to an aging population and a higher life expectancy, in addition to the high rates of obesity and diabetes. In this prospective, single operator, all-comer study, we sought to analyze the performance of ELCA followed by bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) placement in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ISR. A total of 13 patients had ISR treated with a combination of ELCA and BVS, with 9 patients having matched OCT pre, post ELCA and post BVS. Mean age was 65 ± 11.22 and 83% of the patients were male. Hypertension and dyslipidemia were present in 100% of the patients and smoking and diabetes in 50%. After the procedure, we did not detect residual stenosis over 10% in any patient, resulting in a technical success of 100%. No patients had MACE during their hospital stay or within the next six months, resulting in a procedure success of 100%. The mean lumen area increased 0.35 mm from pre procedure to post ELCA and 3.58 mm from post ELCA to post BVS. The final difference, from pre procedure to post BVS, was a 3.93 mm lumen area gain. The mean lumen diameter increased 0.11 mm from baseline to ELCA, 0.95 mm from post laser to BVS implantation and 1.06 mm from pre procedure to post BVS. The NIH area reduced 0.48 mm from pre to post ELCA, 1.13mm from post ELCA to BVS implantation and 1.61 mm from baseline to post BVS implantation. We conclude that ELCA is a safe and feasible debulking method to approach ISR, with high rates of post-procedural BVS success, within six months follow-up.
随着支架植入数量因人口老龄化、预期寿命延长以及肥胖和糖尿病高发病率而呈指数级增长,支架内再狭窄(ISR)的发生率越来越高。在这项前瞻性、单操作者、针对所有患者的研究中,我们试图分析在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的ISR患者中,先进行准分子激光冠状动脉斑块消蚀术(ELCA)然后植入生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)的效果。共有13例ISR患者接受了ELCA和BVS联合治疗,其中9例患者在ELCA术前、术后以及BVS术后均进行了光学相干断层扫描(OCT)检查。患者平均年龄为65±11.22岁,83%为男性。所有患者均患有高血压和血脂异常,50%的患者有吸烟史和糖尿病。术后,我们未在任何患者中检测到超过10%的残余狭窄,技术成功率达100%。在住院期间及接下来的六个月内,没有患者发生主要不良心血管事件(MACE),手术成功率达100%。平均管腔面积从术前到ELCA术后增加了0.35mm,从ELCA术后到BVS术后增加了3.58mm。从术前到BVS术后的最终差异是管腔面积增加了3.93mm。平均管腔直径从基线到ELCA增加了0.11mm,从激光术后到BVS植入增加了0.95mm,从术前到BVS术后增加了1.06mm。美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)面积从术前到ELCA术后减少了0.48mm,从ELCA术后到BVS植入减少了1.13mm,从基线到BVS植入术后减少了1.61mm。我们得出结论,在六个月的随访期内,ELCA是一种安全可行的处理ISR的减容方法,BVS术后成功率较高。