Matsumae Hiroshi, Morizane Yuki, Yamane Shin, Yanagisawa Shuichiro, Sakurai Toshiya, Kobori Akira, Imai Hisanori, Kanzaki Yuki, Suzuki Etsuji, Kadonosono Kazuaki, Hayashi Atsushi, Shiraga Fumio, Kuriyama Shoji
Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Sep;4(9):919-926. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.03.021. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
To compare surgical outcomes between the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and ILM peeling for macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD) in eyes with high myopia.
Multicenter cohort study.
We retrospectively reviewed medical records of consecutive patients treated between June 2008 and September 2018 at 7 hospitals and included 100 eyes with MHRD associated with high myopia in our study. All eyes underwent vitrectomy with the inverted ILM flap technique (57 eyes) or ILM peeling (43 eyes) and were followed up for more than 6 months.
We estimated odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for macular hole (MH) closure using multivariate logistic regression analysis. We also examined factors associated with the postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the final visit using multiple linear regression analysis.
Macular hole closure and postoperative BCVA at the final visit.
The MH closure rate was significantly higher in the inverted ILM flap group (80.7%) than in the ILM peeling group (37.2%; P < 0.001). Moreover, postoperative BCVA at the final visit was significantly better in the former group (0.88 ± 0.48 vs. 0.99 ± 0.48; P = 0.03). The retinal attachment rate (ILM flap, 91.2%; ILM peeling, 79.5%; P = 0.229) and recovery rates for the external limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone line (ILM flap, 10.9%; ILM peeling, 0%; P = 0.12) showed no significant intergroup differences. After adjustment for age, axis, tamponade substance, and dye for ILM staining, the inverted ILM flap technique was associated strongly and positively with MH closure (odds ratio, 7.14; 95% CI, 2.72-18.7; P = 0.001). Moreover, the inverted ILM flap technique and preoperative BCVA were associated significantly and positively with the postoperative BCVA at the final visit.
Our findings suggest that the MH closure rate and postoperative visual outcome for eyes with high myopia-associated MHRD are better with the inverted ILM flap technique than with ILM peeling. Thus, vitrectomy with the inverted ILM flap technique should be considered as the initial surgery for MHRD associated with high myopia.
比较高度近视眼中黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离(MHRD)采用内界膜(ILM)翻转瓣技术与ILM剥除术的手术效果。
多中心队列研究。
我们回顾性分析了2008年6月至2018年9月期间在7家医院连续治疗的患者的病历,本研究纳入了100只患有与高度近视相关的MHRD的眼睛。所有眼睛均接受了采用ILM翻转瓣技术(57只眼)或ILM剥除术(43只眼)的玻璃体切除术,并随访超过6个月。
我们使用多因素逻辑回归分析估计黄斑裂孔(MH)闭合的比值比及其95%置信区间(CI)。我们还使用多元线性回归分析检查了与末次随访时术后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)相关的因素。
末次随访时的黄斑裂孔闭合情况和术后BCVA。
ILM翻转瓣组的MH闭合率(80.7%)显著高于ILM剥除组(37.2%;P<0.001)。此外,前一组末次随访时的术后BCVA明显更好(0.88±0.48对0.99±0.48;P=0.03)。视网膜附着率(ILM翻转瓣组为91.2%;ILM剥除组为79.5%;P=0.229)以及外界膜和椭圆体带线的恢复率(ILM翻转瓣组为10.9%;ILM剥除组为0%;P=0.12)在组间无显著差异。在对年龄、眼轴、填充物质和用于ILM染色的染料进行校正后,ILM翻转瓣技术与MH闭合呈强烈正相关(比值比为7.14;95%CI为2.72-18.7;P=0.001)。此外,ILM翻转瓣技术和术前BCVA与末次随访时的术后BCVA显著正相关。
我们的研究结果表明,对于高度近视相关的MHRD,采用ILM翻转瓣技术的MH闭合率和术后视力结果优于ILM剥除术。因此,采用ILM翻转瓣技术的玻璃体切除术应被视为高度近视相关MHRD的初始手术方式。