Qazi Taha, Smith Alexander, Alexander Megan, Hammer David, Wu Ting, Auerbach Sanford, Noronha Ansu, Wasan Sharmeel, Jones Eric, Weinberg Janice, Farraye Francis A
Cleveland Clinic, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021 Feb 16;27(3):371-378. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa106.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with a reduced quality of life. Minority patients with IBD specifically report more impairing symptoms compared with nonminority patients. Sleep quality, a key component of quality of life, is significantly compromised in minority patients compared with nonminority patients. Nevertheless, subjective and objective sleep assessments in minority patients with IBD have not explicitly been assessed. The purpose of this prospective cohort study is to assess and compare objective sleep parameters utilizing wrist actigraphy between minority and nonminority IBD patients.
In this institutional review board approved study, 74 patients with IBD were recruited and stratified into 2 cohorts by self-identification: white nonminority patients and minority patients. Patients in the minority cohort included black and Hispanic individuals (black and nonblack). Exclusion criteria included significant comorbidity, a history of an underlying sleep disorder, or patients who did not self-identify into categorized cohorts. Sleep was measured not only through wrist-based actigraphy but also with sleep surveys. Sleep parameters were compared between minority and nonminority cohorts. Regression analyses were performed to assess for factors independently associated with parameters of poor sleep quality.
Sixty-four patients (86.4%) were included in the final analysis. Thirty-one individuals (48.4%) were categorized into the nonminority cohort, and 33 (51.6%) patients were in the minority cohort. A significantly higher number of minority patients had poorer sleep efficiency and fragmented sleep compared with nonminority patients (90.9% vs 67.7%; P = 0.03 and 87.8% vs 61.3%; P = 0.02). In the adjusted analysis, minority status was independently associated with poor sleep efficiency (odds ratio = 6.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-28.17; P = 0.0139) and fragmented sleep (odds ratio = 4.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-22.89; P = 0.0389).
Minority patients with IBD were shown to have poorer objective measures of sleep as assessed through wrist actigraphy compared to nonminority patients. Cultural competency in the care of minority patients with IBD, specifically focusing on the management of psychosocial issues, is needed to address these disparities in sleep. The inclusion of minority patients with IBD in studies investigating sleep and other psychosocial issues are warranted not only to assess potential disparities in disease course but also to determine the etiologies of poor sleep in minority patients with IBD.
炎症性肠病(IBD)与生活质量下降有关。与非少数族裔患者相比,少数族裔IBD患者报告的症状更具损害性。睡眠质量是生活质量的一个关键组成部分,与非少数族裔患者相比,少数族裔患者的睡眠质量明显受损。然而,少数族裔IBD患者的主观和客观睡眠评估尚未得到明确评估。这项前瞻性队列研究的目的是利用手腕活动记录仪评估和比较少数族裔和非少数族裔IBD患者的客观睡眠参数。
在这项经机构审查委员会批准的研究中,招募了74名IBD患者,并根据自我认定将其分为2个队列:白人非少数族裔患者和少数族裔患者。少数族裔队列中的患者包括黑人和西班牙裔个体(黑人及非黑人)。排除标准包括严重合并症、潜在睡眠障碍病史或未自我认定为分类队列的患者。不仅通过手腕活动记录仪测量睡眠,还通过睡眠调查进行测量。比较少数族裔和非少数族裔队列之间的睡眠参数。进行回归分析以评估与睡眠质量差参数独立相关的因素。
64名患者(86.4%)纳入最终分析。31名个体(48.4%)被归类为非少数族裔队列,33名(51.6%)患者属于少数族裔队列。与非少数族裔患者相比,少数族裔患者中睡眠效率较差和睡眠碎片化的人数明显更多(90.9%对67.7%;P = 0.03;87.8%对61.3%;P = 0.02)。在调整分析中,少数族裔身份与睡眠效率差(优势比 = 6.41;95%置信区间,1.48 - 28.17;P = 0.0139)和睡眠碎片化(优势比 = 4.98;95%置信区间,1.09 - 22.89;P = 0.0389)独立相关。
与非少数族裔患者相比,少数族裔IBD患者通过手腕活动记录仪评估的客观睡眠指标较差。需要在照顾少数族裔IBD患者时具备文化能力,特别是关注心理社会问题的管理,以解决这些睡眠差异。将少数族裔IBD患者纳入研究睡眠和其他心理社会问题的研究中是有必要的,这不仅是为了评估疾病进程中的潜在差异,也是为了确定少数族裔IBD患者睡眠不佳的病因。