Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct;146(10):2681-2691. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03257-z. Epub 2020 May 24.
In mCRC, disease dynamics may play a critical role in the understanding of long-term outcome. We evaluated depth of response (DpR), time to DpR, and post-DpR survival as relevant endpoints.
We analyzed DpR by central review of computer tomography images (change from baseline to smallest tumor diameter), early tumor shrinkage (≥ 20% reduction in tumor diameter at first reassessment), time to DpR (study randomization to DpR-image), post-DpR progression-free survival (pPFS = DpR-image to tumor progression or death), and post-DpR overall survival (pOS = DpR-image to death) with special focus on BRAF status in 66 patients and primary tumor site in 86 patients treated within the VOLFI-trial, respectively.
BRAF wild-type (BRAF-WT) compared to BRAF mutant (BRAF-MT) patients had greater DpR (- 57.6% vs. - 40.8%, p = 0.013) with a comparable time to DpR [4.0 (95% CI 3.1-4.4) vs. 3.9 (95% CI 2.5-5.5) months; p = 0.8852]. pPFS was 6.5 (95% CI 4.9-8.0) versus 2.6 (95% CI 1.2-4.0) months in favor of BRAF-WT patients (HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.11-0.53); p < 0.001). This transferred into a significant difference in pOS [33.6 (95% CI 26.0-41.3) vs. 5.4 (95% CI 5.0-5.9) months; HR 0.27 (95% CI 0.13-0.55); p < 0.001]. Similar observations were made for patients stratified for primary tumor site.
BRAF-MT patients derive a less profound treatment response compared to BRAF-WT patients. The difference in outcome according to BRAF status is evident after achievement of DpR with BRAF-MT patients hardly deriving any further disease control beyond DpR. Our observations hint towards an aggressive tumor evolution in BRAF-MT tumors, which may already be molecularly detectable at the time of DpR.
在 mCRC 中,疾病动力学可能在理解长期预后方面发挥关键作用。我们评估了深度应答(DpR)、达到 DpR 的时间和 DpR 后无进展生存期(post-DpR progression-free survival,pPFS)作为相关终点。
我们通过对计算机断层扫描图像(基线至最小肿瘤直径的变化)进行中心审查来分析 DpR,早期肿瘤退缩(第一次重新评估时肿瘤直径至少减少 20%),达到 DpR 的时间(从研究随机分组到 DpR 图像),DpR 后无进展生存期(DpR 图像至肿瘤进展或死亡)和 DpR 后总生存期(DpR 图像至死亡),特别关注 BRAF 状态(在 VOLFI 试验中分别治疗的 66 例患者和原发性肿瘤部位的 86 例患者)。
与 BRAF 突变型(BRAF-MT)患者相比,BRAF 野生型(BRAF-WT)患者的 DpR 更大(-57.6% 比-40.8%,p=0.013),达到 DpR 的时间相当[4.0(95%CI 3.1-4.4)比 3.9(95%CI 2.5-5.5)个月;p=0.8852]。BRAF-WT 患者的 pPFS 为 6.5(95%CI 4.9-8.0),而 BRAF-MT 患者为 2.6(95%CI 1.2-4.0),有利于 BRAF-WT 患者(HR 0.24(95%CI 0.11-0.53);p<0.001)。这转化为 pOS 存在显著差异[33.6(95%CI 26.0-41.3)比 5.4(95%CI 5.0-5.9)个月;HR 0.27(95%CI 0.13-0.55);p<0.001]。对按原发性肿瘤部位分层的患者也观察到了类似的结果。
与 BRAF-WT 患者相比,BRAF-MT 患者的治疗反应不那么明显。达到 DpR 后,根据 BRAF 状态的结果差异明显,BRAF-MT 患者在达到 DpR 后几乎没有进一步的疾病控制。我们的观察结果提示 BRAF-MT 肿瘤存在侵袭性肿瘤演变,这种演变可能在达到 DpR 时就已经在分子上可检测到。