Suppr超能文献

转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的治疗反应和疾病进展中的动态变化,重点关注 BRAF 状态和原发肿瘤位置:分析未经治疗的 RAS 野生型 mCRC 患者在 VOLFI 试验(AIO KRK0109)中接受 FOLFOXIRI 联合或不联合 panitumumab 治疗时的情况。

Dynamics in treatment response and disease progression of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with focus on BRAF status and primary tumor location: analysis of untreated RAS-wild-type mCRC patients receiving FOLFOXIRI either with or without panitumumab in the VOLFI trial (AIO KRK0109).

机构信息

Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.

Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct;146(10):2681-2691. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03257-z. Epub 2020 May 24.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In mCRC, disease dynamics may play a critical role in the understanding of long-term outcome. We evaluated depth of response (DpR), time to DpR, and post-DpR survival as relevant endpoints.

METHODS

We analyzed DpR by central review of computer tomography images (change from baseline to smallest tumor diameter), early tumor shrinkage (≥ 20% reduction in tumor diameter at first reassessment), time to DpR (study randomization to DpR-image), post-DpR progression-free survival (pPFS = DpR-image to tumor progression or death), and post-DpR overall survival (pOS = DpR-image to death) with special focus on BRAF status in 66 patients and primary tumor site in 86 patients treated within the VOLFI-trial, respectively.

RESULTS

BRAF wild-type (BRAF-WT) compared to BRAF mutant (BRAF-MT) patients had greater DpR (- 57.6% vs. - 40.8%, p = 0.013) with a comparable time to DpR [4.0 (95% CI 3.1-4.4) vs. 3.9 (95% CI 2.5-5.5) months; p = 0.8852]. pPFS was 6.5 (95% CI 4.9-8.0) versus 2.6 (95% CI 1.2-4.0) months in favor of BRAF-WT patients (HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.11-0.53); p < 0.001). This transferred into a significant difference in pOS [33.6 (95% CI 26.0-41.3) vs. 5.4 (95% CI 5.0-5.9) months; HR 0.27 (95% CI 0.13-0.55); p < 0.001]. Similar observations were made for patients stratified for primary tumor site.

CONCLUSIONS

BRAF-MT patients derive a less profound treatment response compared to BRAF-WT patients. The difference in outcome according to BRAF status is evident after achievement of DpR with BRAF-MT patients hardly deriving any further disease control beyond DpR. Our observations hint towards an aggressive tumor evolution in BRAF-MT tumors, which may already be molecularly detectable at the time of DpR.

摘要

目的

在 mCRC 中,疾病动力学可能在理解长期预后方面发挥关键作用。我们评估了深度应答(DpR)、达到 DpR 的时间和 DpR 后无进展生存期(post-DpR progression-free survival,pPFS)作为相关终点。

方法

我们通过对计算机断层扫描图像(基线至最小肿瘤直径的变化)进行中心审查来分析 DpR,早期肿瘤退缩(第一次重新评估时肿瘤直径至少减少 20%),达到 DpR 的时间(从研究随机分组到 DpR 图像),DpR 后无进展生存期(DpR 图像至肿瘤进展或死亡)和 DpR 后总生存期(DpR 图像至死亡),特别关注 BRAF 状态(在 VOLFI 试验中分别治疗的 66 例患者和原发性肿瘤部位的 86 例患者)。

结果

与 BRAF 突变型(BRAF-MT)患者相比,BRAF 野生型(BRAF-WT)患者的 DpR 更大(-57.6% 比-40.8%,p=0.013),达到 DpR 的时间相当[4.0(95%CI 3.1-4.4)比 3.9(95%CI 2.5-5.5)个月;p=0.8852]。BRAF-WT 患者的 pPFS 为 6.5(95%CI 4.9-8.0),而 BRAF-MT 患者为 2.6(95%CI 1.2-4.0),有利于 BRAF-WT 患者(HR 0.24(95%CI 0.11-0.53);p<0.001)。这转化为 pOS 存在显著差异[33.6(95%CI 26.0-41.3)比 5.4(95%CI 5.0-5.9)个月;HR 0.27(95%CI 0.13-0.55);p<0.001]。对按原发性肿瘤部位分层的患者也观察到了类似的结果。

结论

与 BRAF-WT 患者相比,BRAF-MT 患者的治疗反应不那么明显。达到 DpR 后,根据 BRAF 状态的结果差异明显,BRAF-MT 患者在达到 DpR 后几乎没有进一步的疾病控制。我们的观察结果提示 BRAF-MT 肿瘤存在侵袭性肿瘤演变,这种演变可能在达到 DpR 时就已经在分子上可检测到。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7fd/11804467/661762ab31e9/432_2020_3257_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验