• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与式方法探讨贫困与心理健康问题:参与 DeStress 研究的研究人员和社区合作伙伴对研究过程的反思性评估。

An engaged approach to exploring issues around poverty and mental health: A reflective evaluation of the research process from researchers and community partners involved in the DeStress study.

机构信息

University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2021 May;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):113-121. doi: 10.1111/hex.13065. Epub 2020 May 24.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13065
PMID:32449304
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8137483/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Involving patients, service users, carers and members of the public in research has been part of health policy and practice in the UK for the last 15 years. However, low-income communities tend to remain marginalized from the co-design and delivery of mental health research, perpetuating the potential for health inequalities. Greater understanding is therefore needed on how to meaningfully engage low-income communities in mental health research.

OBJECTIVES

To explore and articulate whether and how an engaged research approach facilitated knowledge coproduction relating to poverty and mental distress.

SETTING

A reflective evaluation of community and researcher engagement in the DeStress study that took place in two low-income areas of South-west England.

DESIGN

Reflective evaluation by the authors through on-going feedback, a focus group and first-person writing and discussion on experiences of working with the DeStress project, and how knowledge coproduction was influenced by an engaged research approach.

RESULTS

An engaged research approach influenced the process and delivery of the DeStress project, creating a space where community partners felt empowered to coproduce knowledge relating to poverty-related mental distress, treatment and the training of health professionals that would otherwise have been missed. We examine motivations for involvement, factors sustaining engagement, how coproduction influenced research analysis, findings and dissemination of outputs, and what involvement meant for different stakeholders.

CONCLUSION

Engaged research supported the coproduction of knowledge in mental health research with low-income communities which led to multiple impacts.

摘要

背景

在过去的 15 年中,让患者、服务使用者、护理人员和公众参与研究一直是英国卫生政策和实践的一部分。然而,低收入社区往往仍然被排除在心理健康研究的共同设计和实施之外,从而使健康不平等的可能性持续存在。因此,需要更多地了解如何让低收入社区有意义地参与心理健康研究。

目的

探讨并阐明参与式研究方法是否以及如何促进与贫困和精神困扰相关的知识共同生产。

设置

对在英格兰西南部两个低收入地区进行的 DeStress 研究中的社区和研究人员参与情况进行的反思性评估。

设计

通过持续反馈、焦点小组以及关于与 DeStress 项目合作的经验的第一人称写作和讨论,作者进行了反思性评估,并探讨了参与式研究方法如何影响知识共同生产。

结果

参与式研究方法影响了 DeStress 项目的过程和实施,为社区合作伙伴创造了一个空间,使他们有能力共同生产与贫困相关的精神困扰、治疗和卫生专业人员培训相关的知识,否则这些知识将被忽视。我们考察了参与的动机、维持参与的因素、共同生产如何影响研究分析、研究结果和研究结果的传播,以及参与对不同利益相关者意味着什么。

结论

参与式研究支持了与低收入社区的心理健康研究中的知识共同生产,这带来了多种影响。

相似文献

1
An engaged approach to exploring issues around poverty and mental health: A reflective evaluation of the research process from researchers and community partners involved in the DeStress study.参与式方法探讨贫困与心理健康问题:参与 DeStress 研究的研究人员和社区合作伙伴对研究过程的反思性评估。
Health Expect. 2021 May;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):113-121. doi: 10.1111/hex.13065. Epub 2020 May 24.
2
Bringing together coproduction and community participatory research approaches: Using first person reflective narrative to explore coproduction and community involvement in mental health research.融合共同生产与社区参与式研究方法:运用第一人称反思性叙事探索共同生产及社区在心理健康研究中的参与情况。
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):701-708. doi: 10.1111/hex.12908. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
3
Researching health inequalities with Community Researchers: practical, methodological and ethical challenges of an 'inclusive' research approach.与社区研究人员共同研究健康不平等问题:“包容性”研究方法的实践、方法和伦理挑战。
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Aug 13;1:9. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0009-4. eCollection 2015.
4
Community engagement and involvement in Ghana: conversations with community stakeholders to inform surgical research.加纳的社区参与:与社区利益相关者的对话,为外科研究提供信息。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 5;7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00270-5.
5
Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.评估一个支持参与心理健康服务的国家培训计划:学习促进因素和学习收益。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):323-336. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12535. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
6
The value of involving patients and public in health services research and evaluation: a qualitative study.让患者和公众参与卫生服务研究与评估的价值:一项定性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 29;7(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00289-8.
7
Experiences of user involvement in mental health settings: User motivations and benefits.服务使用者参与心理健康服务的经历:使用者的动机与益处。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Jun;25(5-6):327-337. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12466. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
8
9
EQUIP training the trainers: an evaluation of a training programme for service users and carers involved in training mental health professionals in user-involved care planning.EQUIP培训培训者:对一项针对参与精神卫生专业人员用户参与式护理计划培训的服务使用者和护理者的培训项目的评估。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):367-376. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12361. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
10
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Process and Outcomes of Public Involvement in Applied Health and Social Care Research: A Rapid Systematic Review.评估公众参与应用健康与社会关怀研究的过程及成果:一项快速系统综述
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70160. doi: 10.1111/hex.70160.
2
Psychiatrists and other medical professionals in Belgium show a substantial lack of knowledge about poverty.比利时的精神科医生和其他医疗专业人员对贫困问题表现出明显的知识匮乏。
Eur Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 17;66(1):e60. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2430.
3
Roles, outcomes, and enablers within research partnerships: A rapid review of the literature on patient and public involvement and engagement in health research.研究伙伴关系中的角色、成果与促进因素:关于患者及公众参与健康研究的文献快速综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jun 15;9(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00448-z.
4
Exploring the impact of engagement in mental health and substance use research: A scoping review and thematic analysis.探索参与精神健康和物质使用研究的影响:范围综述和主题分析。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1806-1819. doi: 10.1111/hex.13779. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
5
Research evidence and implementation gaps in the engagement of people with lived experience in mental health and substance use research: a scoping review.有过精神健康和物质使用经历的人群参与心理健康和物质使用研究的研究证据与实施差距:一项范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 May 11;9(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00442-5.
6
An Introduction to Engaged Phenomenology.参与式现象学导论
JBSP. 2022 Jun 29;53(3):226-242. doi: 10.1080/00071773.2022.2081533. eCollection 2022.
7
Methods to Generate Innovative Research Ideas and Improve Patient and Public Involvement in Modern Epidemiological Research: Review, Patient Viewpoint, and Guidelines for Implementation of a Digital Cohort Study.生成创新研究思路的方法和提高现代流行病学研究中患者和公众参与度的方法:综述、患者观点以及实施数字队列研究的指南。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 23;23(12):e25743. doi: 10.2196/25743.

本文引用的文献

1
Power, Privilege and Knowledge: the Untenable Promise of Co-production in Mental "Health".权力、特权与知识:精神“健康”领域共同生产难以维系的承诺
Front Sociol. 2019 Jul 16;4:57. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00057. eCollection 2019.
2
The violence of narrative: embodying responsibility for poverty-related stress.叙事的暴力:体现对贫困相关压力的责任。
Sociol Health Illn. 2020 Jun;42(5):1123-1138. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13084. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
3
How accessible and acceptable are current GP referral mechanisms for IAPT for low-income patients? Lay and primary care perspectives.当前针对低收入患者的改善心理治疗服务(IAPT)的全科医生转诊机制的可及性和可接受性如何?普通民众和初级保健的观点。
J Ment Health. 2020 Dec;29(6):706-711. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2019.1677876. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
4
Bringing together coproduction and community participatory research approaches: Using first person reflective narrative to explore coproduction and community involvement in mental health research.融合共同生产与社区参与式研究方法:运用第一人称反思性叙事探索共同生产及社区在心理健康研究中的参与情况。
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):701-708. doi: 10.1111/hex.12908. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
5
Engaging "seldom heard" groups in research and intervention development: Offender mental health.让“很少被听到”的群体参与研究和干预措施的制定:罪犯的心理健康。
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1104-1110. doi: 10.1111/hex.12807. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
6
Healthy publics: enabling cultures and environments for health.健康公众:营造促进健康的文化与环境。
Palgrave Commun. 2018 May 15;4:57. doi: 10.1057/s41599-018-0113-9.
7
Using Participatory Learning & Action research to access and engage with 'hard to reach' migrants in primary healthcare research.运用参与式学习与行动研究,在初级医疗保健研究中接触并吸引“难以触及”的移民群体。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan 20;16:25. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1247-8.
8
Worth the Risk? Muddled Relationships in Community-Based Participatory Research.值得冒险吗?社区参与式研究中的复杂关系。
Qual Health Res. 2016 Jan;26(1):69-76. doi: 10.1177/1049732315618660. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
9
Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review.公众参与健康和社会护理研究的相关价值:一项叙述性综述。
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):661-75. doi: 10.1111/hex.12158. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
10
Impact of patient involvement in mental health research: longitudinal study.患者参与心理健康研究的影响:纵向研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;203(5):381-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.119818. Epub 2013 Sep 12.