Mélard Nora, Grard Adeline, Robert Pierre-Olivier, Kuipers Mirte A G, Schreuders Michael, Rimpelä Arja H, Leão Teresa, Hoffmann Laura, Richter Matthias, Kunst Anton E, Lorant Vincent
Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium.
Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium.
Prev Med. 2020 Sep;138:106142. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106142. Epub 2020 May 22.
Assessment of the effectiveness of school tobacco policies (STPs) in reducing adolescent smoking remains inconclusive. Previous studies took insufficient account of different dimensions of STPs, the different views of students and staff, and policy changes over time. This study assessed how a multidimensional STP, as perceived by students and staff, was associated with adolescent smoking over time in six European cities. The SILNE and SILNE-R surveys were conducted among students (n = 18,502) and staff (n = 438) in 38 schools in 2013 and 2016. Three dimensions (comprehensiveness, enforcement, and communication) were assessed and we calculated total STP scores. Multilevel logistic regressions estimated associations of STPs with adolescent smoking on and just outside school premises and with weekly smoking. Further analyses estimated associations between 2013 and 2016 STP changes and smoking outcomes in 2016, controlling for STP and smoking prevalence in 2013. On average, there were few increases in STP scores over time. Greater STP enforcement, as perceived by students, was associated with lower odds of weekly smoking (OR:0.93, 95%CI:0.89-0.97) and of smoking on school premises (OR:0.80, 95%CI:0.72-0.90). Higher total STP scores were associated with lower odds of smoking on school premises (OR:0.76, 95%CI:0.67-0.86), but not of smoking just outside premises or smoking weekly. Greater increases in STP scores over time were associated with lower odds of smoking on school premises in 2016 (OR:0.65, 95%CI:0.47-0.89). Well-enforced STPs may help reduce adolescent smoking at school. Schools should be supported in adopting comprehensive policies that also extend to the surroundings of their premises.
评估学校烟草政策(STP)在减少青少年吸烟方面的有效性尚无定论。以往的研究没有充分考虑STP的不同维度、学生和教职员工的不同观点以及政策随时间的变化。本研究评估了学生和教职员工所认为的多维STP如何随时间推移与六个欧洲城市的青少年吸烟情况相关联。2013年和2016年,在38所学校的学生(n = 18,502)和教职员工(n = 438)中开展了SILNE和SILNE-R调查。评估了三个维度(全面性、执行力度和沟通),并计算了STP总分。多级逻辑回归估计了STP与青少年在校内及校外吸烟以及每周吸烟情况之间的关联。进一步分析估计了2013年至2016年STP变化与2016年吸烟结果之间的关联,并控制了2013年的STP和吸烟率。总体而言,STP分数随时间的增加很少。学生所认为的更强的STP执行力度与每周吸烟几率较低(比值比:0.93,95%置信区间:0.89 - 0.97)以及在校内吸烟几率较低(比值比:0.80,95%置信区间:0.72 - 0.90)相关。更高的STP总分与在校内吸烟几率较低(比值比:0.76,95%置信区间:0.67 - 0.86)相关,但与在校外吸烟或每周吸烟无关。STP分数随时间的更大增幅与2016年在校内吸烟几率较低相关(比值比:0.65,95%置信区间:0.47 - 0.89)。执行良好的STP可能有助于减少学校内的青少年吸烟。应支持学校采用全面的政策,这些政策还应延伸至学校周边环境。