Suppr超能文献

美国药品创新融资:现行框架与新出现的挑战

Financing Drug Innovation in the US: Current Framework and Emerging Challenges.

机构信息

Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.

Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, 02199, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Sep;38(9):905-911. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00926-2.

Abstract

The current US drug innovation financing framework rests on the notion that a defined period of marketing exclusivity combined with the expectation of reimbursement for clinically valuable, cost-effective therapies, followed by vigorous price competition from generic drugs and biosimilars ensures a sufficient return on investment (ROI) to incent private sector risk-based investment and research and development activities while providing access for new treatments to patients. While periodically, alternatives such as government prizes, direct purchases or development, and limits on certain incentives have been proposed, the basic approach has remained intact since the 1980s, with incremental provisions addressing specific gaps and priorities, and adding provisions for biosimilar entry. This paper reviews the main elements of the current US system to financing drug innovation and its approach to balancing multiple objectives. In addition, the system for financing drug innovation must be effective over a wide range of potential scientific approaches and economic conditions. It should be predictable for investors and payers making long-term development and coverage decisions, while also encompassing unanticipated new treatment modalities and scientific progress. An important emerging challenge is posed by clinically transformative, high-investment, single-administration therapies, such as gene therapy. Continued experimentation and the input of a range of stakeholders are needed to ensure next-generation therapeutic advances continue to be developed and made available to patients.

摘要

当前美国的药物创新融资框架基于以下理念

一段时间的市场独占权与对具有临床价值且具有成本效益的治疗方法的报销预期相结合,随后来自仿制药和生物类似药的激烈价格竞争,确保了私人部门基于风险的投资和研发活动的足够回报,同时为新疗法的患者提供了可及性。虽然定期会提出替代方案,如政府奖励、直接购买或开发,以及对某些激励措施的限制,但自 20 世纪 80 年代以来,基本方法保持不变,只是通过增量条款来解决特定的差距和优先事项,并增加了生物类似药进入的条款。本文回顾了美国当前药物创新融资体系的主要要素及其平衡多项目标的方法。此外,药物创新融资体系必须在广泛的潜在科学方法和经济条件下有效。它应该对做出长期开发和覆盖决策的投资者和支付者具有可预测性,同时也包含意料之外的新治疗模式和科学进步。一个重要的新兴挑战是由临床变革性、高投资、单次给药治疗方法带来的,如基因治疗。需要不断进行试验和吸收各种利益相关者的意见,以确保新一代治疗方法的进步能够不断得到开发并提供给患者。

相似文献

1
Financing Drug Innovation in the US: Current Framework and Emerging Challenges.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Sep;38(9):905-911. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00926-2.
2
Biosimilar competition in the United States: statutory incentives, payers, and pharmacy benefit managers.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Feb;34(2):294-301. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0482.
3
A health economic guide to market access of biosimilars.
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2021 Jan;21(1):9-17. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2021.1849132.
7
Comparing Onset of Biosimilar Versus Generic Competition in the United States.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Dec;108(6):1308-1314. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1981. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
8
Biosimilars in the United States: Emerging Issues in Litigation.
BioDrugs. 2017 Jun;31(3):189-205. doi: 10.1007/s40259-017-0216-7.
9
Market Exclusivity Length for Drugs with New Generic or Biosimilar Competition, 2012-2018.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Feb;109(2):367-371. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1983. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
10
Incentives and disincentives to drug innovation: evidence from recent literature.
J Med Econ. 2019 Aug;22(8):713-721. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1613240. Epub 2019 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Current situation and future development of the biopharmaceutical industry in China: A mixed-method study.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 22;13:911165. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.911165. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Ensuring global access to COVID-19 vaccines.
Lancet. 2020 May 2;395(10234):1405-1406. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30763-7. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
2
Cancer statistics, 2020.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Are Payers Ready, Willing, and Able to Provide Access to New Durable Gene Therapies?
Value Health. 2019 Jun;22(6):642-647. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 May 17.
4
Estimating the Clinical Pipeline of Cell and Gene Therapies and Their Potential Economic Impact on the US Healthcare System.
Value Health. 2019 Jun;22(6):621-626. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 May 17.
5
Explaining The Slowdown In Medical Spending Growth Among The Elderly, 1999-2012.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Feb;38(2):222-229. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05372.
6
Updated trends in US brand-name and generic drug competition.
J Med Econ. 2016 Sep;19(9):836-44. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1176578. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
7
Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs.
J Health Econ. 2016 May;47:20-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
8
The roles of patents and research and development incentives in biopharmaceutical innovation.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Feb;34(2):302-10. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1047.
9
Decline in economic returns from new drugs raises questions about sustaining innovations.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Feb;34(2):245-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1029.
10
Biosimilar competition: lessons from Europe.
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014 Feb;13(2):99-100. doi: 10.1038/nrd4210. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验