From the John Goligher Department of Colorectal Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust, St. James's University Hospital.
J Patient Saf. 2022 Jan 1;18(1):e140-e155. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000720.
"Failure to rescue" (FTR) is the failure to prevent a death resulting from a complication of medical care or from a complication of underlying illness or surgery. There is a growing body of evidence that identifies causes and interventions that may improve institutional FTR rates. Why do patients "fail to rescue" after complications in hospital? What clinically relevant interventions have been shown to improve organizational fail to rescue rates? Can successful rescue methods be classified into a simple strategy?
A systematic review was performed and the following electronic databases searched between January 1, 2006, to February 12, 2018: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and BNI databases. All studies that explored an intervention to improve failure to rescue in the adult population were considered.
The search returned 1486 articles. Eight hundred forty-two abstracts were reviewed leaving 52 articles for full assessment. Articles were classified into 3 strategic arms (recognize, relay, and react) incorporating 6 areas of intervention with specific recommendations.
Complications occur consistently within healthcare organizations. They represent a huge burden on patients, clinicians, and healthcare systems. Organizations vary in their ability to manage such events. Failure to rescue is a measure of institutional competence in this context. We propose "The 3 Rs of Failure to Rescue" of recognize, relay, and react and hope that this serves as a valuable framework for understanding the phases where failure of patient salvage may occur. Future efforts at mitigating the differences in outcome from complication management between units may benefit from incorporating this proposed framework into institutional quality improvement.
“未能抢救”(FTR)是指未能预防因医疗护理并发症或基础疾病或手术并发症而导致的死亡。越来越多的证据表明,可以确定可能提高机构 FTR 率的原因和干预措施。为什么患者在医院并发症后“未能抢救”?哪些临床相关干预措施已被证明可提高组织 FTR 率?成功的抢救方法能否归类为一种简单的策略?
进行了系统评价,并在 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 2 月 12 日期间搜索了以下电子数据库:MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Cochrane 图书馆、CINAHL 和 BNI 数据库。考虑了所有探索改善成人人群中抢救失败的干预措施的研究。
搜索返回了 1486 篇文章。回顾了 842 篇摘要,留下 52 篇进行全面评估。文章分为 3 个战略分支(识别、传递和反应),结合了 6 个干预领域,并提出了具体建议。
并发症在医疗保健组织中经常发生。它们给患者、临床医生和医疗保健系统带来了巨大的负担。组织在管理此类事件的能力上存在差异。抢救失败是衡量机构在这方面能力的标准。我们提出了“抢救失败的 3Rs”,即识别、传递和反应,并希望这一框架有助于理解患者抢救失败可能发生的阶段。未来在减轻单位间并发症管理结果差异的努力中,可能受益于将这一拟议框架纳入机构质量改进。