Suppr超能文献

非机械性翻修适应证预示全股骨置换后再次保肢失败。

Nonmechanical Revision Indications Portend Repeat Limb-Salvage Failure Following Total Femoral Replacement.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and the Sarcoma & Connective Tissue Oncology Program, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Sep 2;102(17):1511-1520. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is scant evidence to guide decision-making for patients considering total femoral replacement (TFR). We aimed to identify the indication, patient, disease, and surgical technique-related factors associated with failure. We hypothesized that failure occurs more frequently in the setting of revision surgical procedures, with infection as the predominant failure mode.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients receiving total femoral endoprostheses for oncological and revision arthroplasty indications; 166 patients met these criteria. Our primary independent variable of interest was TFR for a revision indication (arthroplasty or limb salvage); the primary outcome was failure. Analyses were performed for patient variables (age, sex, diagnosis group, indication), implant variables (model, decade, length, materials), and treatment variables. We analyzed TFR failures with respect to patient factors, operative technique, and time to failure. We conducted bivariate logistic regressions predicting failure and used a multivariate model containing variables showing bivariate associations with failure.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (27%) had treatment failure. Failure occurred in 24 (23%) of 105 primary TFRs and in 20 (33%) of 61 revision TFRs; the difference was not significant (p = 0.134) in bivariate analysis but was significant (p = 0.044) in multivariate analysis. The mean age at the time of TFR was 37 years in the primary group and 51 years in the revision group (p = 0.0006). Of the patients who had mechanical failure, none had reoccurrence of their original failure mode, whereas all 8 patients from the nonmechanical cohort had reoccurrence of the original failure mode; this difference was significant (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

TFR has a high failure rate and a propensity for deep infection, especially in the setting of revision indications and prior infection. All failed TFRs performed for revision indications for infection or local recurrence failed by reoccurrence of the original failure mode and resulted in amputation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

目前针对考虑行全股骨置换术(TFR)的患者,指导决策的证据很少。我们旨在确定与失败相关的适应证、患者、疾病和手术技术相关因素。我们假设在翻修手术中失败更为常见,感染是主要的失败模式。

方法

我们对因肿瘤和翻修关节置换适应证而行全股骨假体置换的患者进行了回顾性队列研究;符合这些标准的患者有 166 名。我们感兴趣的主要独立变量是因翻修适应证(关节置换或保肢)而行 TFR;主要结局是失败。对患者变量(年龄、性别、诊断组、适应证)、植入物变量(型号、年代、长度、材料)和治疗变量进行了分析。我们根据患者因素、手术技术和失败时间分析了 TFR 失败。我们进行了二变量逻辑回归预测失败,并使用包含与失败呈二变量关联的变量的多变量模型。

结果

44 名患者(27%)存在治疗失败。在 105 例初次 TFR 中有 24 例(23%)发生失败,在 61 例翻修 TFR 中有 20 例(33%)发生失败;二变量分析差异无统计学意义(p=0.134),但多变量分析差异有统计学意义(p=0.044)。初次 TFR 时的平均年龄在初次组为 37 岁,在翻修组为 51 岁(p=0.0006)。在机械性失败的患者中,没有患者再次发生其最初的失败模式,而在非机械性队列的 8 例患者中,所有患者均再次发生了最初的失败模式;这种差异有统计学意义(p=0.0001)。

结论

TFR 具有较高的失败率和深部感染倾向,尤其是在翻修适应证和既往感染的情况下。所有因感染或局部复发而行翻修的 TFR 失败患者,最初的失败模式均再次发生,并导致截肢。

证据等级

治疗性 IV 级。请参阅作者说明,以获取完整的证据等级描述。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验