Department of Botany and Zoology, University of Stellenbosch, Matieland, South Africa.
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, Grenoble, France.
PLoS One. 2020 May 26;15(5):e0233597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233597. eCollection 2020.
While biodiversity hotspots are typically identified on the basis of species number per unit area, their exceptional richness is often attributed, either implicitly or explicitly, to high diversification rates. High species concentrations, however, need not reflect rapid diversification, with the diversity of some hotspots accumulating at modest rates over long timespans. Here we explore the relationship between diversification in time vs. diversification in space and develop the concept of diversification density to describe the spatial scale of species accumulation in a clade. We investigate how plant height is associated with both aspects of diversification in Alooideae, a large plant subfamily with its center of diversity in the Greater Cape Floristic Region. We first reconstruct a time-calibrated phylogeny for Alooideae and demonstrate an evolutionary tendency towards reduced plant height. While plant height does not correlate with diversification rate across Alooideae it does so with diversification per unit space: clades of small plants tend to have the highest diversification densities. Furthermore, we find that diversification in time vs. space are uncorrelated. Our results show that diversification rate and density can be decoupled, and suggest that while some biodiversity hotspots might have been generated by high diversification rates, others are the product of high diversification density.
虽然生物多样性热点通常是根据单位面积的物种数量来确定的,但它们的异常丰富度通常被隐含或明确地归因于高多样化率。然而,高物种浓度不一定反映快速多样化,一些热点的多样性在很长的时间跨度内以适度的速度积累。在这里,我们探讨了时间和空间多样化之间的关系,并提出了多样化密度的概念来描述一个进化枝中物种积累的空间尺度。我们调查了植物高度如何与 Alooideae 中多样化的两个方面相关联,Alooideae 是一个具有多样化中心在大开普植物区的大型植物亚科。我们首先为 Alooideae 重建了一个时间校准的系统发育,并证明了植物高度向降低的进化趋势。虽然植物高度与 Alooideae 的多样化率没有相关性,但它与单位空间的多样化有关:小植物的进化枝往往具有最高的多样化密度。此外,我们发现时间和空间的多样化是不相关的。我们的结果表明,多样化率和密度可以解耦,这表明虽然一些生物多样性热点可能是由高多样化率产生的,但其他热点是高多样化密度的产物。