Suppr超能文献

欧洲各实验室在遵循血脂异常管理推荐指南方面做得如何?欧洲心脏标志物指南应用情况(CAMARGUE)研究。

How well do laboratories adhere to recommended guidelines for dyslipidaemia management in Europe? The CArdiac MARker Guideline Uptake in Europe (CAMARGUE) study.

作者信息

De Wolf Hélène A, Langlois Michel R, Suvisaari Janne, Aakre Kristin M, Baum Hannsjörg, Collinson Paul, Duff Christopher J, Gruson Damien, Hammerer-Lercher Angelika, Pulkki Kari, Stankovic Sanja, Stavljenic-Rukavina Ana, Laitinen Päivi

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, AZ St. Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, Brugge, Belgium; Ghent University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, AZ St. Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, Brugge, Belgium; Ghent University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Sep;508:267-272. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.05.038. Epub 2020 May 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The CArdiac MARker Guidelines Uptake in Europe Study (CAMARGUE) initiated by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) aims to survey the current use of evidence-based guidelines for dyslipidemia testing in Europe.

METHODS

In 2019 a web-based questionnaire was distributed via EFLM National Societies to clinical laboratories in Europe. Questions covered pre-analytics, analytical methods, measurement units, flagging of decision thresholds, and use of decision-enhancing comments.

RESULTS

Returns were obtained from 452 laboratories from 28 countries. Most laboratories always use nonfasting blood samples for lipid assays (66%). Lipid profiles are reported in mmol/L by 59% of the laboratories, mainly from 14 countries promoting the use of SI units. Important differences in flagging of decision thresholds were observed, with less than half of the laboratories applying the guideline-recommended LDL cholesterol threshold. Only 17% of the laboratories add an alert comment when familial hypercholesterolemia is suspected and 23% when risk of pancreatitis from hypertriglyceridemia is high.

CONCLUSIONS

There are marked differences among laboratories in Europe in terms of pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical lipid management that could have an important clinical impact. This relates to different availability of assays or different laboratory practices on reporting and flagging of lipid profiles.

摘要

背景

由欧洲临床化学和检验医学联合会(EFLM)发起的欧洲心脏标志物指南应用研究(CAMARGUE)旨在调查欧洲目前基于证据的血脂异常检测指南的使用情况。

方法

2019年,通过EFLM各国学会向欧洲的临床实验室发放了一份基于网络的调查问卷。问题涵盖分析前、分析方法、测量单位、决策阈值标记以及决策增强注释的使用。

结果

收到了来自28个国家的452家实验室的回复。大多数实验室在进行血脂检测时总是使用非空腹血样(66%)。59%的实验室以mmol/L报告血脂谱,主要来自14个推广使用国际单位制单位的国家。在决策阈值标记方面观察到了重要差异,不到一半的实验室应用指南推荐的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇阈值。当怀疑家族性高胆固醇血症时,只有17%的实验室添加警示注释,当高甘油三酯血症导致胰腺炎的风险很高时,这一比例为23%。

结论

欧洲各实验室在分析前、分析和分析后血脂管理方面存在显著差异,这可能会产生重要的临床影响。这与不同的检测方法可用性或血脂谱报告和标记的不同实验室操作有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验