Hammerer-Lercher Angelika, Gruson Damien, Stankovic Sanja, Collinson Paul, Suvisaari Janne, Pulkki Kari, Duff Christopher J, Baum Hannsjörg, Stavljenic-Rukavina Ana, Aakre Kristin M, Langlois Michel R, Laitinen Paivi
Institute for Laboratory Medicine, County Hospital Aarau AG, Aarau, Switzerland.
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc and Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Dec;511:59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.09.030. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
The European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) initiated the CArdiac MARker Guidelines Uptake in Europe (CAMARGUE) Study to survey if current biomarker testing for heart failure (HF) in Europe is in accordance with up-dated guidelines.
A web-based questionnaire was distributed to clinical laboratories via European biochemical societies in 2019. Questions covered the type of natriuretic peptide (NP) assays performed, decision limits for HF, and opinion concerning requirement of different thresholds in patients with renal failure or obesity.
There were 347 participating laboratories mostly from European countries with 266 offering NP testing. NP testing was increased from 67% to 77% between 2013 and 2019. NT-proBNP remained the preferred biomarker. Recommended decision limits were implemented for BNP (85%) and better focused for NT-proBNP (40%) than in the previous survey. The survey revealed that laboratorians are willing to support the translation of adjusted cut-off values for age, gender and for patients with conditions like renal insufficiency.
Guidelines stimulate clinical laboratories to offer NP testing with high value for the diagnosis and management of HF, and to present adjusted medical decision limits. Future guidelines should encourage the use of personalized cut-offs for some confounding factors.
欧洲临床化学与检验医学联合会(EFLM)发起了欧洲心脏标志物指南应用(CAMARGUE)研究,以调查欧洲目前用于心力衰竭(HF)的生物标志物检测是否符合最新指南。
2019年通过欧洲生化协会向临床实验室发放了一份基于网络的调查问卷。问题涵盖了所进行的利钠肽(NP)检测类型、HF的决策限值,以及关于肾衰竭或肥胖患者不同阈值要求的意见。
共有347家参与实验室,大多来自欧洲国家,其中266家提供NP检测。2013年至2019年间,NP检测从67%增加到77%。NT-proBNP仍然是首选生物标志物。与之前的调查相比,BNP(85%)的推荐决策限值得到了实施,NT-proBNP的决策限值(40%)更具针对性。调查显示,检验人员愿意支持针对年龄、性别以及肾功能不全等患者调整临界值。
指南促使临床实验室提供对HF诊断和管理具有高价值的NP检测,并给出调整后的医学决策限值。未来的指南应鼓励针对一些混杂因素使用个性化临界值。