Suppr超能文献

富血小板血浆在脊柱融合手术中的作用:系统评价与Meta分析

Role of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Spinal Fusion Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Manini Daudi R, Shega Frank D, Guo ChaoFeng, Wang YuXiang

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan Province, China.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mwananyamala Regional Referral Hospital, P.O. Box 61665, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.

出版信息

Adv Orthop. 2020 May 6;2020:8361798. doi: 10.1155/2020/8361798. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been used very successfully in enhancing bone fusion in animal experiments. Also, the efficaciousness of PRP in other specialties of medicine such as dentistry, dermatology ophthalmology, and sports medicine is well documented. But the use of PRP to augment bone fusion after spinal surgery in humans is still controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the role of PRP in enhancing spinal fusion by fastening the rate of new bone formation and decreasing pain after spinal surgery in humans.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library studies that compared PRP versus control in enhancing spinal fusion after deformity correction.

RESULTS

Five retrospective studies with 253 participants and nine prospective cohort studies with 460 participants were identified. The bone fusion rate was excellent for studies that used a high platelet concentration in PRP relative to control (odds ratio (OR) = 4.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.13, 8.83), and < 0.05) while bone fusion was poor to studies that used a low concentrate of platelet in PRP relative to control. The rate of new bone formation was high in the PRP group compared to the control group with the mean difference in Hounsfield unit (HU) 144.91 (95% CI (80.63, 209.18), < 0.05). Time to bone fusion was short in the PRP group during the first six months of surgery relative to the control group with a mean difference of -2.03 (95% CI (-2.35, -1.7); < 0.05). No difference was found in pain reduction by visual analog score (VAS) between the PRP group and control.

CONCLUSION

PRP facilitates new bone formation and bone fusion with a minimum concentration of the growth factor 5 times that of the peripheral blood. PRP stimulatory effects are not continuous and are very effective within six months of implantation.

摘要

背景

富血小板血浆(PRP)在动物实验中已非常成功地用于促进骨融合。此外,PRP在牙科、皮肤科、眼科和运动医学等其他医学专业中的有效性也有充分记录。但在人类脊柱手术后使用PRP增强骨融合仍存在争议。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定PRP在通过加快人类脊柱手术后新骨形成速率和减轻疼痛来增强脊柱融合方面的作用。

方法

我们检索了PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆中比较PRP与对照组在畸形矫正后增强脊柱融合的研究。

结果

确定了5项有253名参与者的回顾性研究和9项有460名参与者的前瞻性队列研究。相对于对照组,在PRP中使用高血小板浓度的研究骨融合率极佳(优势比(OR)=4.35,95%置信区间(CI)(2.13,8.83),P<0.05),而相对于对照组,在PRP中使用低血小板浓度的研究骨融合较差。与对照组相比,PRP组新骨形成率较高,亨氏单位(HU)平均差异为144.91(95%CI(80.63,209.18),P<0.05)。相对于对照组,PRP组在手术后的前六个月骨融合时间较短,平均差异为-2.03(95%CI(-2.35,-1.7);P<0.05)。PRP组和对照组之间在通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)减轻疼痛方面未发现差异。

结论

PRP以生长因子浓度至少为外周血5倍的最低浓度促进新骨形成和骨融合。PRP的刺激作用不是持续的,并且在植入后六个月内非常有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f5f/7229543/bba77cda7eae/AORTH2020-8361798.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验