University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, KS, USA.
University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Spine Deform. 2020 Dec;8(6):1279-1286. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00147-9. Epub 2020 May 26.
This study sought to analyze factors that predict postoperative shoulder balance based on clinical photography.
Based on inclusion criteria, 132 AIS patients were selected. Age, sex, and BMI of each patient were recorded. The following parameters were recorded from radiographs: clavicle angle, T1 tilt, the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV), lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) thoracic kyphosis, lumbar modifier, preoperative and postoperative proximal thoracic Cobb angle, preoperative and postoperative main thoracic Cobb angle, and preoperative and postoperative thoracolumbar Cobb angle, if applicable. Two spine surgeons independently assigned the photographs shoulder balance grades based on the WRVAS (1-2 = Acceptable, 3-5 = Unacceptable). Surgeons were blinded as to whether the photographs were taken preoperatively or postoperatively. The shoulders were also graded as right high, left high, or balanced.
Of all variables analyzed, only main thoracic Cobb angle correction (MTCAC) showed a statistically significant relationship with postoperative shoulder balance (p = 0.01). Odds of having unacceptable shoulder balance increase by 21% for every 5° increase in MTCAC (Adjusted OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.015-1.452). The odds of unbalanced shoulders are 4.7 times higher for patients whose MTCAC is 40° or more (p = 0.001). Inter-rater reliability was excellent (k =0 .7). Intra rater reliability was perfect for Surgeon 1 (kappa = 1.0) and showed substantial agreement for Surgeon 2 (kappa = 0.8) CONCLUSIONS: Greater correction of main thoracic Cobb angle predicts unacceptable postoperative shoulder balance with 40° of correction signifying a major dichotomy between acceptable and unacceptable.
本研究旨在通过临床摄影分析预测术后肩部平衡的因素。
根据纳入标准,选择了 132 例 AIS 患者。记录每位患者的年龄、性别和 BMI。从影像学上记录以下参数:锁骨角、T1 倾斜、上器械椎(UIV)、最低器械椎(LIV)胸椎后凸、腰椎修正器、术前和术后近端胸椎 Cobb 角、术前和术后主胸 Cobb 角,以及适用时的胸腰椎 Cobb 角。两位脊柱外科医生根据 WRVAS(1-2=可接受,3-5=不可接受)独立为照片分配肩部平衡等级。外科医生对照片是术前还是术后拍摄不知情。肩部也被评为右高、左高或平衡。
在所分析的所有变量中,只有主胸 Cobb 角矫正(MTCAC)与术后肩部平衡呈统计学显著相关(p=0.01)。MTCAC 每增加 5°,不可接受的肩部平衡的几率增加 21%(调整后的 OR=1.21,95%CI 1.015-1.452)。MTCAC 为 40°或更高的患者,肩部不平衡的几率高出 4.7 倍(p=0.001)。两位外科医生的组内可靠性均为优秀(k=0.7)。外科医生 1 的组内可靠性为完美(kappa=1.0),外科医生 2 的组内可靠性显示出实质性一致(kappa=0.8)。
主胸 Cobb 角的较大矫正预示着术后肩部平衡不可接受,40°的矫正代表了可接受和不可接受之间的主要二分法。