• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单吻合口胃旁路术中胆胰支长度:何者最佳?

Biliopancreatic Limb Length in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Which Is the Best?

作者信息

Pizza Francesco, Lucido Francesco Saverio, D'Antonio Dario, Tolone Salvatore, Gambardella Claudio, Dell'Isola Chiara, Docimo Ludovico, Marvaso Alberto

机构信息

Division of Surgery, Hospital "A. Rizzoli", Lacco Ameno, Naples, Italy.

Division of General, Mininvasive and Bariatric Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2020 Oct;30(10):3685-3694. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04687-x.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-020-04687-x
PMID:32458362
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is rapidly spreading. Concerns about biliary reflux and malabsorption with consequent nutritional deficits exist, so studies on biliopancreatic limb (BPL) adequate length in OAGB are required to balance excess weight loss in percentage (% EWL), resolution of comorbidities, and nutritional deficit. The purpose was to evaluate, at 2 years after OAGB, the effects of BPL length on weight loss, resolution of comorbidity, and nutritional deficiencies in patients.

METHODS

From January 2015 to January 2017, 180 patients were collected into three groups based BPL length: group A, 150 cm; group B, 180 cm; and group C, 200 cm. Aims were to compare %EWL, co-morbidity resolution rates, nutritional parameters, and morbidity/mortality in the three groups.

RESULTS

The total number of patients was 180: 60 for each group. One hundred seventy-two (95%) patients attended the 1-year follow-up (group A = 58; group B = 58, group C = 56). One hundred fifty-seven (87%) patients attended the 2-year follow-up (group A = 52 (87%); group B = 53 (88%); group C = 52 (87%)). There was no statistically significant difference in %EWL, %TWL, T2DM, and hypertension resolution rates among the groups. About vitamin deficiency, differences were not statistically significant. Iron and ferritin deficiency rate were statistically significant only between A and C groups.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our evidence, standardization of BPL length shorter than 200 cm is suggested, potentially minimizing malnutrition-related outcomes. Our study seems to show that a BPL of 150-180 cm is safe and effective in terms of EWL and comorbidity improvement with low malnutrition effects even in BMI > 50.

摘要

背景

单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)的应用正在迅速普及。人们担心胆汁反流和吸收不良会导致营养缺乏,因此需要对OAGB中胆胰支(BPL)的合适长度进行研究,以平衡体重减轻百分比(%EWL)、合并症的解决和营养缺乏之间的关系。目的是评估OAGB术后2年时,BPL长度对患者体重减轻、合并症解决和营养缺乏的影响。

方法

2015年1月至2017年1月,根据BPL长度将180例患者分为三组:A组,150cm;B组,180cm;C组,200cm。目的是比较三组的%EWL、合并症解决率、营养参数以及发病率/死亡率。

结果

患者总数为180例,每组60例。172例(95%)患者参加了1年随访(A组=58例;B组=58例,C组=56例)。157例(87%)患者参加了2年随访(A组=52例(87%);B组=53例(88%);C组=52例(87%))。各组之间的%EWL、%TWL、2型糖尿病和高血压解决率无统计学显著差异。关于维生素缺乏,差异无统计学意义。铁和铁蛋白缺乏率仅在A组和C组之间有统计学显著差异。

结论

根据我们的证据,建议将BPL长度标准化为短于200cm,这可能会将与营养不良相关的结果降至最低。我们的研究似乎表明,150 - 180cm的BPL在EWL和合并症改善方面是安全有效的,即使在BMI > 50时营养不良影响也较低。

相似文献

1
Biliopancreatic Limb Length in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Which Is the Best?单吻合口胃旁路术中胆胰支长度:何者最佳?
Obes Surg. 2020 Oct;30(10):3685-3694. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04687-x.
2
MGB-OAGB: Effect of Biliopancreatic Limb Length on Nutritional Deficiency, Weight Loss, and Comorbidity Resolution.MGB-OAGB:胆胰旁路术胆胰支长度对营养缺乏、体重减轻和合并症缓解的影响。
Obes Surg. 2018 Nov;28(11):3439-3445. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3405-7.
3
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-Mini Gastric Bypass with Tailored Biliopancreatic Limb Length Formula Relative to Small Bowel Length: Preliminary Results.一种吻合口胃旁路术-迷你胃旁路术,采用与小肠长度相关的定制胆胰肠袢长度公式:初步结果。
Obes Surg. 2019 Sep;29(9):3062-3070. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04019-8.
4
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Performed with a 150-cm Biliopancreatic Limb Delivers Weight Loss Outcomes Similar to Those with a 200-cm Biliopancreatic Limb at 18 -24 Months.150cm 胆胰支与 200cm 胆胰支在 18-24 个月行单吻合胃旁路术可获得相似的减重效果。
Obes Surg. 2020 Apr;30(4):1258-1264. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04359-5.
5
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) with a 150-cm Biliopancreatic Limb (BPL) Versus a 200-cm BPL, a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.150cm 胆胰支与 200cm 胆胰支的 1 型胃旁路术(OAGB):系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2023 Jun;33(6):1846-1856. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06556-9. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
6
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with a Biliopancreatic Limb of 150 cm: Weight Loss, Nutritional Outcomes, Endoscopic Results, and Quality of Life at 8-Year Follow-Up.150cm 胆胰转流式胃旁路吻合术:8 年随访时的减重效果、营养状况、内镜结果和生活质量
Obes Surg. 2020 Nov;30(11):4206-4217. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04775-y.
7
150-cm Versus 200-cm Biliopancreatic Limb One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.150-cm 与 200-cm 胆胰支吻合胃旁路术:倾向评分匹配分析。
Obes Surg. 2022 Sep;32(9):2839-2845. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06203-9. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
8
The Influence of Different Alimentary and Biliopancreatic Limb Lengths in Gastric Bypass Patients.胃旁路手术患者不同消化道和胆胰肠吻合段长度的影响。
Obes Surg. 2021 Feb;31(2):481-489. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05028-8. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
9
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with a Biliopancreatic Limb of 200 or 160 cm: 1-Year Results of the Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS).比较 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与胆胰支 200 或 160cm 单吻合胃旁路术的疗效和安全性:德黑兰肥胖治疗研究(TOTS)的 1 年结果。
Obes Surg. 2020 Sep;30(9):3528-3535. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04681-3.
10
Are There Ideal Small Bowel Limb Lengths for One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) to Obtain Optimal Weight Loss and Remission of Comorbidities with Minimal Nutritional Deficiencies?行 One-Anastomosis 胃旁路术(OAGB)以获得最佳减重效果和缓解合并症是否存在理想的小肠长度,同时最小化营养缺乏?
World J Surg. 2020 Mar;44(3):855-862. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05243-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes and Safety of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB): A Three-Year Retrospective Study.单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)的疗效与安全性:一项为期三年的回顾性研究。
Obes Surg. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08150-7.
2
Tailored Biliopancreatic Limb Length to 40% of Total Small Bowel Length in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (TABLE-40): Protocol of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.在单吻合口胃旁路手术中将胆胰肢长度调整为小肠总长度的40%(表40):一项前瞻性随机对照试验方案
Obes Surg. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08035-9.
3
Post OAGB Reflux: Strengthening Evidence-Based Surveillance.
肥胖症胃旁路术后反流:加强循证监测
Obes Surg. 2025 Jun 1. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07959-6.
4
Reflux-Related Abnormalities at Distal oesophagus, Gastric Pouch and Anastomotic Site 4 Years After OAGB: Diagnostic Accuracies of Endoscopy Compared to Biopsy and of Symptoms Compared to Both.肥胖症胃旁路手术4年后远端食管、胃囊和吻合口处的反流相关异常:内镜检查与活检的诊断准确性及症状与两者相比的诊断准确性
Obes Surg. 2025 Apr;35(4):1273-1284. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07700-3. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
5
Beyond Insulin: Modified OAGB in Low-BMI Insulin-Resistant and Non-compliant Type 2 Diabetic Patients.超越胰岛素:低体重指数胰岛素抵抗且不依从的2型糖尿病患者的改良袖状胃旁路术
Obes Surg. 2025 Mar;35(3):843-851. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07754-3. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
6
Iron deficiency anemia after one anastomosis gastric bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单吻合口胃旁路术后缺铁性贫血:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1509-1522. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11535-5. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
7
Integrated Insights into Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: Improving Life Quality and Reducing Mortality in Obesity.代谢与减重手术综合见解:改善肥胖症患者生活质量并降低死亡率
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 26;61(1):14. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010014.
8
Marchiafava-Bignami disease post-bariatric surgery: A case report and review of similar cases.减肥手术后的马基亚法瓦-比尼亚米病:一例病例报告及相似病例综述
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2025 Jan;30(1):64-69. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2025.1.20240036.
9
MGB-OAGB International Club-Results of a Modified Delphi Consensus on Controversies in OAGB.MGB-OAGB国际俱乐部——关于OAGB争议的改良德尔菲共识结果
Obes Surg. 2024 Dec;34(12):4541-4554. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07563-0. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
10
EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF OBESITY: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS.一种吻合胃旁路手术治疗肥胖症的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2024 Aug 30;37:e1814. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720202400021e1814. eCollection 2024.