From the Department of Surgery (C.A.M., J.R.M., J.W.S., D.A.M.-A., M.R.H.), and Center for Health Outcomes and Policy (A.H.C.-N., B.L.H., M.P.G., J.W.S., M.R.H.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jun;88(6):839-846. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002674.
The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) developed an anatomic grading system to assess disease severity through increasing grades of inflammation. Severity grading can then be utilized in risk-adjustment and stratification of patient outcomes for clinical benchmarking. We sought to validate the AAST appendicitis grading system by examining the ability of AAST grade to predict clinical outcomes used for clinical benchmarking.
Surgical quality program data were prospectively collected on all adult patients undergoing appendectomy for acute appendicitis at our institution between December 2013 and May 2018. The AAST acute appendicitis grade from 1 to 5 was assigned for all patients undergoing open or laparoscopic appendectomy. Primary outcomes were occurrence of major complications, any complications, and index hospitalization length of stay. Multivariable models were constructed for each outcome without and with inclusion of the AAST grade as an ordinal variable. We also developed models using International Classification of Diseases, 9th or 10th Rev.-Clinical Modification codes to determine presence of perforation for comparison.
A total of 734 patients underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis. The AAST score distribution included 561 (76%) in grade 1, 49 (6.7%) in grade 2, 79 (10.8%) in grade 3, 33 (4.5%) in grade 4, and 12 (1.6%) in grade 5. The mean age was 35.3 ± 14.7 years, 47% were female, 20% were nonwhite, and 69% had private insurance. Major complications, any complications, and hospital length of stay were all positively associated with AAST grade (p < 0.05). Risk-adjustment model fit improved after including AAST grade in the major complications, any complications, and length of stay multivariable regression models. The AAST grade was a better predictor than perforation status derived from diagnosis codes for all primary outcomes studied.
Increasing AAST grade is associated with higher complication rates and longer length of stay in patients with acute appendicitis. The AAST grade can be prospectively collected and improves risk-adjusted modeling of appendicitis outcomes.
Prospective/Epidemiologic, Level III.
美国外科创伤协会(AAST)制定了一种解剖学分级系统,通过增加炎症等级来评估疾病严重程度。严重程度分级可用于风险调整和患者结局分层,以进行临床基准测试。我们旨在通过检查 AAST 分级预测用于临床基准测试的临床结局的能力来验证急性阑尾炎分级系统。
2013 年 12 月至 2018 年 5 月,我院对所有接受阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的成年患者前瞻性收集手术质量计划数据。对所有接受开放或腹腔镜阑尾切除术的患者进行 AAST 急性阑尾炎 1 至 5 级分级。主要结局是发生重大并发症、任何并发症和指数住院时间的长短。在不包括 AAST 分级作为有序变量的情况下,为每个结局构建多变量模型,并包括 AAST 分级。我们还使用国际疾病分类第 9 或第 10 修订版临床修正代码来确定穿孔的存在,以进行比较,建立了模型。
共 734 例患者接受阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎。AAST 评分分布包括 561 例(76%)1 级、49 例(6.7%)2 级、79 例(10.8%)3 级、33 例(4.5%)4 级和 12 例(1.6%)5 级。平均年龄为 35.3±14.7 岁,47%为女性,20%为非白人,69%有私人保险。主要并发症、任何并发症和住院时间长短均与 AAST 分级呈正相关(p<0.05)。在多变量回归模型中纳入 AAST 分级后,主要并发症、任何并发症和住院时间长短的风险调整模型拟合得到改善。对于所有研究的主要结局,AAST 分级均优于源自诊断代码的穿孔状态,是更好的预测因素。
在患有急性阑尾炎的患者中,AAST 分级增加与更高的并发症发生率和更长的住院时间相关。AAST 分级可以前瞻性收集,并改善阑尾炎结局的风险调整建模。
前瞻性/流行病学,III 级。