• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全民医疗保险对急诊治疗后即离诊费用补偿的影响。

The Influence of Medicare for All on Reimbursement for Emergency Care Treat-and-Release Visits.

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;76(4):454-458. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.003. Epub 2020 May 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.003
PMID:32461010
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Single-payer health care is supported by most Americans, but the effect of single payer on any particular sector of the health care market has not been well explored. We examine the effect of 2 potential single-payer designs, Medicare for All and an alternative including Medicare and Medicaid, on total payments and out-of-pocket spending for treat-and-release emergency care (patients discharged after an emergency department [ED] visit).

METHODS

We used the 2013 to 2016 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to determine estimates of payments made for ED visits by insurance type, and the 2015 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to estimate the proportion of ED visits covered by each insurance type.

RESULTS

We found that total payments were predicted to increase from $85.5 billion to $89.0 billion (range $81.3 to $99.8 billion) in the Medicare-only scenario and decrease to $79.4 billion (range $71.6 to $87.2 billion) under Medicare/Medicaid, whereas out-of-pocket costs were predicted to decrease from $116 per visit to $45 with Medicare and to $36 with Medicare/Medicaid.

CONCLUSION

In this study of ED treat-and-release patients, a transition to a Medicare for All system may increase ED reimbursement and reduce consumer out-of-pocket costs, whereas a system that maintains Medicaid in addition to Medicare could reduce total payments for emergency care.

摘要

研究目的

大多数美国人支持单一支付者医疗保险,但单一支付者对医疗保健市场任何特定部门的影响尚未得到充分探索。我们研究了两种潜在的单一支付者设计,即全民医疗保险和包括医疗保险和医疗补助在内的替代方案,对急诊治疗和释放(患者在急诊部门[ED]就诊后出院)的总支付和自付费用的影响。

方法

我们使用 2013 年至 2016 年的医疗支出面板调查来确定按保险类型计算的 ED 就诊支付额的估计值,并使用 2015 年全国医院门诊医疗保健调查来估计每种保险类型涵盖的 ED 就诊比例。

结果

我们发现,在仅实施医疗保险的情况下,总支付预计将从 855 亿美元增加到 890 亿美元(范围为 813 亿至 998 亿美元),而在实施医疗保险/医疗补助的情况下将减少到 794 亿美元(范围为 716 亿至 872 亿美元),而自付费用预计将从每次就诊 116 美元减少到医疗保险下的 45 美元,以及医疗保险/医疗补助下的 36 美元。

结论

在这项 ED 治疗和释放患者的研究中,向全民医疗保险制度过渡可能会增加 ED 报销,并降低消费者自付费用,而维持医疗保险和医疗补助的制度可能会降低急诊护理的总费用。

相似文献

1
The Influence of Medicare for All on Reimbursement for Emergency Care Treat-and-Release Visits.全民医疗保险对急诊治疗后即离诊费用补偿的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;76(4):454-458. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.003. Epub 2020 May 24.
2
The Cost Shifting Economics of United States Emergency Department Professional Services (2016-2019).美国急诊专业服务的成本转移经济学(2016-2019)。
Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Dec;82(6):637-646. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.04.026. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
3
Changes in insurance status and emergency department visits after the 2008 economic downturn.2008年经济衰退后保险状况及急诊科就诊情况的变化。
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):73-80. doi: 10.1111/acem.12553. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
4
Emergency Department Out-of-Pocket Expenditures by Insurance, 1999 to 2016.1999 年至 2016 年按保险划分的急诊科自付费用。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;74(3):317-324. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.04.015. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
5
Decreasing reimbursements for outpatient emergency department visits across payer groups from 1996 to 2004.1996年至2004年期间,各支付方群体的门诊急诊科就诊报销费用不断减少。
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Mar;51(3):265-74, 274.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.08.009. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
6
US Health Care Spending by Payer and Health Condition, 1996-2016.美国按支付方和健康状况划分的医疗保健支出,1996-2016 年。
JAMA. 2020 Mar 3;323(9):863-884. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0734.
7
Trends in charges and payments for nonhospitalized emergency department pediatric visits, 1996-2003.1996 - 2003年非住院急诊科儿科就诊的收费及支付趋势
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Apr;15(4):347-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00075.x.
8
Interventional pain management at crossroads: the perfect storm brewing for a new decade of challenges.介入性疼痛管理正处于十字路口:酝酿着新十年挑战的完美风暴。
Pain Physician. 2010 Mar-Apr;13(2):E111-40.
9
Differences Between Public And Private Hospital Payment Rates Narrowed, 2012-16.2012-2016 年,公立医院与民营医院的付费差距收窄。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):94-99. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00415.
10
Total and Out-of-Pocket Costs Surrounding Emergency Department Care Among Older Adults Enrolled in Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage.老年人在传统医疗保险和医疗保险优势计划下急诊护理的总费用和自付费用。
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;84(3):285-294. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.04.023. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
COVID-19, Medicare for All, and the Uncertain Future of Emergency Medicine.2019冠状病毒病、全民医疗保险与急诊医学的不确定未来
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;76(4):459-461. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.06.034. Epub 2020 Jun 24.