I Department and Chair of Cardiology, Medical University of Lodz, Bieganski Hospital, Lodz, Poland.
Department of Cardiology, University "L. Vanvitelli"- AORN dei Colli - Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Oct;36(10):1831-1843. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01897-3. Epub 2020 May 27.
Noninvasive estimation of systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) during exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) is recommended for pulmonary hemodynamics evaluation but remains flow-dependent. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of pulmonary vascular reserve index (PVRI) estimation during ESE combining SPAP with cardiac output (CO) or exercise-time and compare its value in three group of patients: with invasively confirmed pulmonary hypertension (PH), at risk of PH development (PH risk) mainly with systemic sclerosis and in controls (C) without clinical risk factors for PH, age-matched with PH risk patients. We performed semisupine ESE in 171 subjects: 31 PH, 61 PH at risk and 50 controls as well as in 29 young, healthy normals. Rest and stress assessment included: tricuspid regurgitant flow velocity (TRV), pulmonary acceleration time (ACT), CO (Doppler-estimated). SPAP was calculated from TRV or ACT when TRV was not available. We estimated PVRI based on CO (peak CO/SPAP0.1) or exercise-time (ESE time/SPAP0.1). During stress, TRV was measurable in 44% patients ACT in 77%, either one in 95%. PVRI was feasible in 65% subjects with CO and 95% with exercise-time (p < 0.0001). PVRI was lower in PH compared to controls both for CO-based PVRI (group 1 = 1.0 ± 0.95 vs group 3 = 4.28 ± 2.3, p < 0.0001) or time-based PVRI estimation (0.66 ± 0.39 vs 3.95 ± 2.26, p < 0.0001). The proposed criteria for PH detection were for CO-based PVRI ≤ 1.29 and ESE-time based PVRI ≤ 1.0 and for PH risk ≤ 1.9 and ≤ 1.7 respectively. Noninvasive estimation of PVRI can be obtained in near all patients during ESE, without contrast administration, integrating TRV with ACT for SPAP assessment and using exercise time as a proxy of CO. These indices allow for comparison of pulmonary vascular dynamics in patients with varied exercise tolerance and clinical status.
在运动超声心动图(ESE)期间,非侵入性估计收缩期肺动脉压(SPAP)被推荐用于肺血流动力学评估,但仍依赖于流量。我们的目的是评估在 ESE 期间结合 SPAP 与心输出量(CO)或运动时间来估计肺血管储备指数(PVRI)的可行性,并比较其在三组患者中的价值:经有创证实的肺动脉高压(PH)、有发展为 PH 风险(PH 风险)的患者,主要是系统性硬化症患者,以及无 PH 临床危险因素、年龄与 PH 风险患者匹配的对照组(C)。我们对 171 名受试者进行了半卧位 ESE:31 名 PH、61 名 PH 风险和 50 名对照组,以及 29 名年轻、健康的正常人。休息和应激评估包括:三尖瓣反流流速(TRV)、肺动脉加速时间(ACT)、CO(多普勒估计)。当 TRV 不可用时,从 TRV 或 ACT 计算 SPAP。我们根据 CO(峰值 CO/SPAP0.1)或运动时间(ESE 时间/SPAP0.1)估计 PVRI。在应激期间,44%的患者可测量 TRV,77%的患者可测量 ACT,95%的患者可测量其中一种。65%的患者可使用 CO 获得 PVRI,95%的患者可使用运动时间获得 PVRI(p<0.0001)。与对照组相比,PH 患者的 PVRI 更低,无论是基于 CO 的 PVRI(组 1=1.0±0.95 与组 3=4.28±2.3,p<0.0001)还是基于时间的 PVRI 估计(0.66±0.39 与 3.95±2.26,p<0.0001)。用于检测 PH 的建议标准为基于 CO 的 PVRI≤1.29 和基于 ESE 时间的 PVRI≤1.0,以及 PH 风险≤1.9 和≤1.7。在 ESE 期间,几乎所有患者都可以在不使用造影剂的情况下获得 PVRI 的非侵入性估计值,通过 TRV 与 ACT 结合评估 SPAP,并使用运动时间作为 CO 的替代指标。这些指标可用于比较不同运动耐量和临床状态的患者的肺血管动力学。