• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性、多中心可行性研究,旨在评估伴有或不伴有腿部疼痛的慢性难治性背痛患者中差异靶向脊髓刺激程控的可行性。

Prospective, Multicenter Feasibility Study to Evaluate Differential Target Multiplexed Spinal Cord Stimulation Programming in Subjects With Chronic Intractable Back Pain With or Without Leg Pain.

机构信息

Center for Interventional Pain and Spine, Exton, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Precision Spine Care, Tyler, Texas, U.S.A.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2020 Sep;20(7):761-768. doi: 10.1111/papr.12908. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1111/papr.12908
PMID:32462791
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This prospective, open-label, multicenter study evaluated the feasibility of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy programming for chronic low back pain that uses multiple electrical pulsed signals (Differential Target Multiplexed).

METHODS

Twenty-five SCS candidates with low back pain equal to or greater than lower limb pain were enrolled at 7 sites in the United States. The subjects evaluated standard and Differential Target Multiplexed programs, each for 4 ± 1 days. A commercially available SCS trial system was used for standard SCS therapy programming. During the trialing of the multiplexed programs, implanted temporary leads were connected to an investigational external trial stimulator system.

RESULTS

Twenty subjects concluded the study. The mean baseline numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) score for low back pain was 7.4, with a mean age of 62.4 years and mean pain duration of 18.0 years. Significant relief in back pain was observed for both treatments, with significantly better response with multiplexed programming. At the end of the trial period, subjects reported a reduction in their mean NPRS score from baseline to 4.2 after standard programming and to 2.4 after Differential Target Multiplexed programming. The difference between standard and multiplexed programming was significant. The responder rate for low back pain relief was 50% for standard programming and 80% for Differential Target Multiplexed programming. Eighty-five percent of subjects who evaluated both programming approaches preferred Differential Target Multiplexed SCS.

CONCLUSION

In this difficult-to-treat patient population, subjects reported significant reduction in chronic back pain when using multiplexed programming. A randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm the results from this feasibility study.

摘要

目的

本前瞻性、开放标签、多中心研究评估了使用多种电脉冲信号(差分靶向复用)进行慢性腰痛脊髓刺激(SCS)治疗编程的可行性。

方法

在美国 7 个地点招募了 25 名腰痛等于或大于下肢疼痛的 SCS 候选者。受试者评估了标准和差分靶向复用程序,每个程序评估 4±1 天。使用商业上可用的 SCS 试验系统进行标准 SCS 治疗编程。在复用程序的试验过程中,植入的临时导联连接到一个研究用外部试验刺激器系统。

结果

20 名受试者完成了研究。腰痛的基线数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)平均评分为 7.4,平均年龄为 62.4 岁,平均疼痛持续时间为 18.0 年。两种治疗方法均观察到腰痛明显缓解,复用编程的反应明显更好。在试验结束时,受试者报告他们的平均 NPRS 评分从基线时的 4.2 降至标准编程后的 2.4,从标准编程后的 4.2 降至标准编程后的 2.4。标准和复用编程之间的差异具有统计学意义。标准编程的腰痛缓解应答率为 50%,而差分靶向复用编程的应答率为 80%。85%的评估了两种编程方法的受试者更喜欢差分靶向复用 SCS。

结论

在这种难以治疗的患者群体中,使用复用编程时,受试者报告慢性腰痛明显减轻。需要进行随机临床试验来证实这项可行性研究的结果。

相似文献

1
Prospective, Multicenter Feasibility Study to Evaluate Differential Target Multiplexed Spinal Cord Stimulation Programming in Subjects With Chronic Intractable Back Pain With or Without Leg Pain.前瞻性、多中心可行性研究,旨在评估伴有或不伴有腿部疼痛的慢性难治性背痛患者中差异靶向脊髓刺激程控的可行性。
Pain Pract. 2020 Sep;20(7):761-768. doi: 10.1111/papr.12908. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
2
Twelve-Month results from multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation and traditional spinal cord stimulation in subjects with chronic intractable back pain and leg pain.多中心、开放标签、随机对照临床试验的 12 个月结果,比较了慢性难治性腰痛和腿痛患者中差异靶向多路复用脊髓刺激与传统脊髓刺激的效果。
Pain Pract. 2021 Nov;21(8):912-923. doi: 10.1111/papr.13066. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
3
Options: A Prospective, Open-Label Study of High-Dose Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Back and Leg Pain.一项前瞻性、开放性标签研究,观察高剂量脊髓刺激治疗慢性腰背及下肢疼痛患者的效果。
Pain Physician. 2020 Jan;23(1):87-98.
4
Comparison of 10-kHz High-Frequency and Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: 24-Month Results From a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial.10千赫高频与传统低频脊髓刺激治疗慢性腰腿痛的比较:一项多中心、随机、对照关键试验的24个月结果
Neurosurgery. 2016 Nov;79(5):667-677. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001418.
5
Results From a Prospective, Clinical Study (US-nPower) Evaluating a Miniature Spinal Cord Stimulator for the Management of Chronic, Intractable Pain.一项评估微型脊髓刺激器治疗慢性、顽固性疼痛的前瞻性临床研究(美国-nPower)结果。
Pain Physician. 2023 Nov;26(7):575-584.
6
Long-term safety and efficacy of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation to treat chronic back and leg pain (Evoke): a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.闭环脊髓刺激治疗慢性腰背和下肢疼痛的长期安全性和有效性(Evoke):一项双盲、随机、对照试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Feb;19(2):123-134. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30414-4. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
7
Novel 10-kHz High-frequency Therapy (HF10 Therapy) Is Superior to Traditional Low-frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: The SENZA-RCT Randomized Controlled Trial.新型10千赫兹高频疗法(HF10疗法)在治疗慢性腰腿痛方面优于传统低频脊髓刺激:SENZA-RCT随机对照试验
Anesthesiology. 2015 Oct;123(4):851-60. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000774.
8
High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: 6-Month Australian Clinical Experience.10千赫兹高频脊髓刺激治疗慢性疼痛:澳大利亚6个月临床经验
Pain Physician. 2016 May;19(4):267-80.
9
High-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back pain patients: results of a prospective multicenter European clinical study.高频脊髓刺激治疗慢性腰痛患者:一项前瞻性多中心欧洲临床研究结果。
Neuromodulation. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):59-65; discussion 65-6. doi: 10.1111/ner.12006. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
10
Twelve-month results from a randomized controlled trial comparing differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation and conventional spinal cord stimulation in subjects with chronic refractory axial low back pain not eligible for spine surgery.一项随机对照试验的12个月结果,该试验比较了差异靶点多重脊髓刺激与传统脊髓刺激对不符合脊柱手术条件的慢性难治性轴性下背痛患者的疗效。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 Jul 17;19:100528. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100528. eCollection 2024 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation in patients with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type II: a study protocol for a 12-month multicentre cohort study (DETECT).差异靶点脊髓刺激治疗持续性脊髓痛综合征 II 型患者的研究方案:一项为期 12 个月的多中心队列研究(DETECT)
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 9;14(11):e083610. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083610.
2
Navigating the Neuroimmunomodulation Frontier: Pioneering Approaches and Promising Horizons-A Comprehensive Review.神经免疫调节前沿探索:开拓性方法与广阔前景——全面综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Sep 7;25(17):9695. doi: 10.3390/ijms25179695.
3
The Role and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Treatment of Chronic Pain.
人工智能在慢性疼痛治疗中的作用和应用。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024 Aug;28(8):769-784. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01264-0. Epub 2024 Jun 1.
4
Spinal Cord Stimulation Waveforms for the Treatment of Chronic Pain.脊髓刺激波形用于慢性疼痛治疗。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024 Jul;28(7):595-605. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01247-1. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
5
Real World Characterization of Chronic Pain, Success Rates and Implant Rates: Evidence from a Digital Health Platform of Patients Undergoing Spinal Cord Stimulation Evaluations.真实世界的慢性疼痛特征描述、成功率和植入率:来自接受脊髓刺激评估的患者的数字健康平台的证据。
J Pain. 2023 Dec;24(12):2228-2239. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.07.008. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
6
Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Study.脊髓刺激治疗老年患者失败性腰椎手术后综合征的疗效:一项回顾性研究。
Pain Res Manag. 2023 May 9;2023:2136562. doi: 10.1155/2023/2136562. eCollection 2023.
7
Regulation of Expression of Extracellular Matrix Proteins by Differential Target Multiplexed Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) and Traditional Low-Rate SCS in a Rat Nerve Injury Model.在大鼠神经损伤模型中,通过差异靶点多重脊髓刺激(SCS)和传统低速率SCS对细胞外基质蛋白表达的调控
Biology (Basel). 2023 Mar 31;12(4):537. doi: 10.3390/biology12040537.
8
The Role of Neuro-Immune Interactions in Chronic Pain: Implications for Clinical Practice.神经免疫相互作用在慢性疼痛中的作用:对临床实践的启示。
J Pain Res. 2022 Aug 4;15:2223-2248. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S246883. eCollection 2022.
9
Modulation of Glia-Mediated Processes by Spinal Cord Stimulation in Animal Models of Neuropathic Pain.脊髓刺激对神经性疼痛动物模型中胶质细胞介导过程的调节作用
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 14;2:702906. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2021.702906. eCollection 2021.
10
A New Direction for Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation: Combining Contemporary Therapy Paradigms with Evoked Compound Action Potential Sensing.闭环脊髓刺激的新方向:将当代治疗模式与诱发复合动作电位传感相结合。
J Pain Res. 2021 Dec 29;14:3909-3918. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S344568. eCollection 2021.