Center for Interventional Pain and Spine, Exton, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Precision Spine Care, Tyler, Texas, U.S.A.
Pain Pract. 2020 Sep;20(7):761-768. doi: 10.1111/papr.12908. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
This prospective, open-label, multicenter study evaluated the feasibility of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy programming for chronic low back pain that uses multiple electrical pulsed signals (Differential Target Multiplexed).
Twenty-five SCS candidates with low back pain equal to or greater than lower limb pain were enrolled at 7 sites in the United States. The subjects evaluated standard and Differential Target Multiplexed programs, each for 4 ± 1 days. A commercially available SCS trial system was used for standard SCS therapy programming. During the trialing of the multiplexed programs, implanted temporary leads were connected to an investigational external trial stimulator system.
Twenty subjects concluded the study. The mean baseline numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) score for low back pain was 7.4, with a mean age of 62.4 years and mean pain duration of 18.0 years. Significant relief in back pain was observed for both treatments, with significantly better response with multiplexed programming. At the end of the trial period, subjects reported a reduction in their mean NPRS score from baseline to 4.2 after standard programming and to 2.4 after Differential Target Multiplexed programming. The difference between standard and multiplexed programming was significant. The responder rate for low back pain relief was 50% for standard programming and 80% for Differential Target Multiplexed programming. Eighty-five percent of subjects who evaluated both programming approaches preferred Differential Target Multiplexed SCS.
In this difficult-to-treat patient population, subjects reported significant reduction in chronic back pain when using multiplexed programming. A randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm the results from this feasibility study.
本前瞻性、开放标签、多中心研究评估了使用多种电脉冲信号(差分靶向复用)进行慢性腰痛脊髓刺激(SCS)治疗编程的可行性。
在美国 7 个地点招募了 25 名腰痛等于或大于下肢疼痛的 SCS 候选者。受试者评估了标准和差分靶向复用程序,每个程序评估 4±1 天。使用商业上可用的 SCS 试验系统进行标准 SCS 治疗编程。在复用程序的试验过程中,植入的临时导联连接到一个研究用外部试验刺激器系统。
20 名受试者完成了研究。腰痛的基线数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)平均评分为 7.4,平均年龄为 62.4 岁,平均疼痛持续时间为 18.0 年。两种治疗方法均观察到腰痛明显缓解,复用编程的反应明显更好。在试验结束时,受试者报告他们的平均 NPRS 评分从基线时的 4.2 降至标准编程后的 2.4,从标准编程后的 4.2 降至标准编程后的 2.4。标准和复用编程之间的差异具有统计学意义。标准编程的腰痛缓解应答率为 50%,而差分靶向复用编程的应答率为 80%。85%的评估了两种编程方法的受试者更喜欢差分靶向复用 SCS。
在这种难以治疗的患者群体中,使用复用编程时,受试者报告慢性腰痛明显减轻。需要进行随机临床试验来证实这项可行性研究的结果。