Oh Jin Kyung, Seo Jeong Sook, Park Yong Hyun, Park Jae Hyeong, Lee Seung Ah, Lee Sahmin, Kim Dae Hee, Song Jong Min, Kang Duk Hyun
Division of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jul;28(3):174-182. doi: 10.4250/jcvi.2020.0005. Epub 2020 May 27.
Hypertensive patients are at increased risk of diastolic dysfunction. The hypothesis of this study was that addition of amlodipine would be superior to valsartan in improving diastolic dysfunction associated with hypertension.
In this randomized trial, we randomly assigned 104 controlled, hypertensive patients with diastolic dysfunction to receive either amlodipine 2.5 mg or valsartan 40 mg, in addition to antihypertensive therapy. The primary end point was the change in the ratio of early mitral inflow velocity to early mitral annular relaxation velocity (E/E') from baseline to the 6-month follow-up. Secondary end points included changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP), left ventricular (LV) mass index, and left atrial volume index.
SBP decreased significantly from baseline in both treatment groups (p < 0.001). E/E' decreased significantly from 13.0 ± 2.2 to 12.0 ± 2.7 in the amlodipine arm and from 14.4 ± 4.3 to 12.7 ± 3.7 in the valsartan arm (p < 0.01 in both groups). The change of E/E' was not significantly different between treatment groups (p = 0.25). There were also no significant between-group differences regarding the changes in SBP, LV mass index, and left atrial volume index. Two patients (3.8%) in the amlodipine group and 1 (16%) in the valsartan group had serious adverse event.
In this randomized trial involving controlled hypertensive patients, addition of amlodipine or valsartan was associated with an improvement of diastolic dysfunction, but the effects on diastolic dysfunction did not differ significantly between the treatment groups.
高血压患者发生舒张功能障碍的风险增加。本研究的假设是,在改善与高血压相关的舒张功能障碍方面,加用氨氯地平优于缬沙坦。
在这项随机试验中,我们将104例血压得到控制的舒张功能障碍高血压患者随机分为两组,除抗高血压治疗外,分别给予2.5 mg氨氯地平或40 mg缬沙坦。主要终点是从基线到6个月随访时二尖瓣血流舒张早期峰值速度与二尖瓣环舒张早期峰值速度比值(E/E')的变化。次要终点包括收缩压(SBP)、左心室(LV)质量指数和左心房容积指数的变化。
两个治疗组的SBP均较基线显著降低(p<0.001)。氨氯地平组E/E'从13.0±2.2显著降至12.0±2.7,缬沙坦组从14.4±4.3显著降至12.7±3.7(两组p均<0.01)。治疗组间E/E'的变化无显著差异(p = 0.25)。SBP、LV质量指数和左心房容积指数的变化在组间也无显著差异。氨氯地平组有2例患者(3.8%)发生严重不良事件,缬沙坦组有1例患者(16%)发生严重不良事件。
在这项涉及血压得到控制的高血压患者的随机试验中,加用氨氯地平或缬沙坦均可改善舒张功能障碍,但两组对舒张功能障碍的影响无显著差异。