Suppr超能文献

瑞典重症监护病房中脓毒症的报告不足:一项回顾性观察性多中心研究。

Sepsis is underreported in Swedish intensive care units: A retrospective observational multicentre study.

作者信息

Lengquist Maria, Lundberg Oscar H M, Spångfors Martin, Annborn Martin, Levin Helena, Friberg Hans, Frigyesi Attila

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Skåne University Hospital, Intensive and Perioperative Care, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Sep;64(8):1167-1176. doi: 10.1111/aas.13647. Epub 2020 Jun 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is a common indication for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Since definitions vary across studies, comparisons of prevalence and outcomes have been challenging. We aimed to compare sepsis according to ICU discharge codes with sepsis according to Sepsis-3 criteria and to investigate the epidemiology of sepsis in the ICU. We hypothesized that sepsis using discharge codes is underreported.

METHODS

Adult ICU admissions to four ICUs in Sweden between 2015 and 2017 were screened for sepsis according to the Sepsis-3 criteria. Medical records were reviewed and data extracted from the Swedish Intensive Care Registry.

RESULTS

Of 5990 adult ICU patients, 28% fulfilled the Sepsis-3 criteria on admission, but only 31% of them had sepsis as the registered main diagnosis at ICU discharge. Of the 1654 Sepsis-3 patients, 38% met the septic shock criteria. The Sepsis-3 in-hospital mortality was 26% compared to 33% in patients with septic shock. The incidence rate for ICU-treated sepsis was 81 cases per 100 000 person-years. One in four had a positive blood culture, and 44% were culture negative.

CONCLUSION

This large Swedish multicentre study showed that 28% of adult ICU patients fulfilled the Sepsis-3 criteria, but only one third of them had sepsis according to ICU discharge codes. We could confirm our hypothesis, that sepsis is severely underreported in Swedish ICUs, and we conclude that discharge codes should not be used for quality control or research purposes.

摘要

背景

脓毒症是重症监护病房(ICU)常见的收治指征。由于不同研究的定义各异,患病率和结局的比较颇具挑战性。我们旨在对比依据ICU出院编码诊断的脓毒症与依据脓毒症-3标准诊断的脓毒症,并调查ICU中脓毒症的流行病学情况。我们推测,使用出院编码诊断的脓毒症存在漏报现象。

方法

对2015年至2017年期间瑞典四家ICU收治的成年患者,依据脓毒症-3标准筛查脓毒症。查阅病历并从瑞典重症监护登记处提取数据。

结果

在5990例成年ICU患者中,28%在入院时符合脓毒症-3标准,但其中仅有31%在ICU出院时将脓毒症登记为主要诊断。在1654例符合脓毒症-3标准的患者中,38%符合感染性休克标准。脓毒症-3患者的院内死亡率为26%,而感染性休克患者为33%。ICU治疗的脓毒症发病率为每10万人年81例。四分之一的患者血培养呈阳性,44%为培养阴性。

结论

这项大型瑞典多中心研究表明,28%的成年ICU患者符合脓毒症-3标准,但根据ICU出院编码,其中只有三分之一被诊断为脓毒症。我们证实了我们的假设,即瑞典ICU中脓毒症存在严重漏报情况,我们得出结论,出院编码不应用于质量控制或研究目的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验