Siegel Corey A, Yang Fei, Eslava Sergio, Cai Zhaohui
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Celgene Corporation, Summit, New Jersey, USA.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020 Feb;11(2):e00128. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000128.
Biologic therapies have been available for inflammatory bowel disease for >20 years, but patient outcomes have not changed appreciably over this time period. To better understand medication utilization for this disease, we evaluated a novel technique for visualizing treatment pathways, including initial treatment, switching, and combination therapies.
This retrospective, observational study used administrative claims data from the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Database. Adult patients with ≥2 consecutive health claims and newly diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) were evaluated. Treatment pathways were visualized using Sankey diagrams representing the number of patients receiving treatment and duration of each treatment.
In all, 28,119 patients with UC and 16,260 patients with CD were identified. The most common initial treatment for UC was 5-aminosalicylic acid monotherapy (61% of the patients), followed by corticosteroid monotherapy (25%); <1% of patients were initially treated with biologics. The most common initial treatment for CD was corticosteroid monotherapy (42%), followed by 5-aminosalicylic acid monotherapy (35%); <5% of the patients were initially treated with biologics. Significantly fewer patients followed biologic vs nonbiologic treatment pathways (UC: 6% vs 94%, CD: 19% vs 81%, both P < 0.05).
Significantly fewer patients with inflammatory bowel disease followed treatment pathways that included biologic therapies compared with nonbiologic therapies, and very few patients were ever initiated on biologic therapy. Although we have made significant progress in treatment, our most effective medications are only being used in a small proportion of patients, suggesting barriers prevent optimized patient management.
生物疗法已用于治疗炎症性肠病20多年,但在此期间患者的治疗效果并无明显改善。为了更好地了解该疾病的药物使用情况,我们评估了一种可视化治疗路径的新技术,包括初始治疗、换药和联合治疗。
这项回顾性观察性研究使用了来自Truven Health MarketScan商业和医疗保险数据库的管理索赔数据。对连续有≥2次健康索赔且新诊断为溃疡性结肠炎(UC)或克罗恩病(CD)的成年患者进行评估。使用桑基图可视化治疗路径,该图代表接受治疗的患者数量和每种治疗的持续时间。
共识别出28119例UC患者和16260例CD患者。UC最常见的初始治疗是5-氨基水杨酸单药治疗(61%的患者),其次是皮质类固醇单药治疗(25%);<1%的患者初始接受生物制剂治疗。CD最常见的初始治疗是皮质类固醇单药治疗(42%),其次是5-氨基水杨酸单药治疗(35%);<5%的患者初始接受生物制剂治疗。采用生物制剂治疗路径的患者明显少于采用非生物制剂治疗路径的患者(UC:6%对94%,CD:19%对81%,P均<0.05)。
与非生物疗法相比,采用包括生物疗法在内的治疗路径的炎症性肠病患者明显较少,且很少有患者开始接受生物疗法治疗。尽管我们在治疗方面取得了显著进展,但我们最有效的药物仅在一小部分患者中使用,这表明存在障碍阻碍了对患者的优化管理。