Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612. Email:
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 May 28;17:E38. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.190396.
Data on the comparative effectiveness of Diabetes Prevention Programs (DPPs) in the workplace are limited.
Between September 2015 and July 2016, employees of the City and County of San Francisco who were at risk for type 2 diabetes (N = 158) were randomly assigned to one of 2 DPP-derived programs recognized by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: an in-person YMCA-DPP (n = 78) or an online virtual lifestyle management DPP (VLM-DPP) offered through Canary Health (n = 80). The primary outcome was change in body weight assessed at 6 and 12 months. Follow-up ended in August 2017.
Both the YMCA-DPP and VLM-DPP yielded a significant reduction in percentage body weight at 6 months. For the YMCA-DPP, mean percentage change at 6 months was -2.70% (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.91% to -1.48%) and at 12 months was -2.46% (95% CI, -4.24% to -0.68%). For the VLM-DPP, mean percentage change at 6 months was -2.41% (95% CI, -4.07% to -0.77%) and at 12 months was -1.59% (95% CI, -3.51% to 0.33%). The mean between-condition difference at 6 months was -0.25% (95% CI, -2.04% to 1.55%) and at 12 months was -0.84% (95% CI, -3.03% to 1.34%). No significant differences were observed between conditions. The YMCA-DPP had a slightly higher reduction in waist circumference than VLM-DDP at 6 months (mean between-condition difference -2.00 cm [95% CI, -4.24 to 0.25 cm]). Participant engagement, expressed as mean number of completed core program sessions, was significantly higher for the YMCA-DPP than the VLM-DPP. Participants of the YMCA-DPP completed an average of 10.2 sessions (95% CI, 9.0 to 11.4), and participants of the VLM-DPP completed an average of 5.9 sessions (95% CI, 4.7 to 7.1). The adjusted mean between-condition difference was 4.2 sessions (95% CI, 2.54 to 5.99).
Both the YMCA-DPP and VLM-DPP yielded weight loss at 6 months, which was maintained at 12 months in the YMCA-DPP. The workplace may be an effective setting to offer DPPs.
关于预防糖尿病计划(DPP)在工作场所的比较效果的数据有限。
在 2015 年 9 月至 2016 年 7 月期间,旧金山市和县面临 2 型糖尿病风险的员工(N=158)被随机分配到两种经疾病控制与预防中心认可的 DPP 衍生计划之一:现场 YMCA-DPP(n=78)或通过 Canary Health 提供的在线虚拟生活方式管理 DPP(VLM-DPP)(n=80)。主要结局是在 6 个月和 12 个月时评估的体重变化。随访于 2017 年 8 月结束。
YMCA-DPP 和 VLM-DPP 在 6 个月时均显著降低体重百分比。对于 YMCA-DPP,6 个月时的平均百分比变化为-2.70%(95%置信区间[CI],-3.91%至-1.48%),12 个月时为-2.46%(95%CI,-4.24%至-0.68%)。对于 VLM-DPP,6 个月时的平均百分比变化为-2.41%(95%CI,-4.07%至-0.77%),12 个月时为-1.59%(95%CI,-3.51%至 0.33%)。6 个月时的平均条件间差异为-0.25%(95%CI,-2.04%至 1.55%),12 个月时为-0.84%(95%CI,-3.03%至 1.34%)。未观察到两种条件之间存在显著差异。在 6 个月时,YMCA-DPP 比 VLM-DDP 腰围减少更多(平均条件间差异-2.00cm[95%CI,-4.24 至 0.25cm])。YMCA-DPP 的参与者参与度,以完成的核心课程平均次数表示,明显高于 VLM-DPP。YMCA-DPP 的参与者平均完成了 10.2 次课程(95%CI,9.0 至 11.4),VLM-DPP 的参与者平均完成了 5.9 次课程(95%CI,4.7 至 7.1)。调整后的平均条件间差异为 4.2 次(95%CI,2.54 至 5.99)。
YMCA-DPP 和 VLM-DPP 在 6 个月时均能减轻体重,在 YMCA-DPP 中 12 个月时仍能保持体重减轻。工作场所可能是提供 DPP 的有效场所。