Suppr超能文献

皮质体积差异在精神病高危人群中是由表面积驱动的。

Cortical Volume Differences in Subjects at Risk for Psychosis Are Driven by Surface Area.

机构信息

The Zurich Program for Sustainable Development of Mental Health Services (ZInEP), University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Schizophr Bull. 2020 Dec 1;46(6):1511-1519. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa066.

Abstract

In subjects at risk for psychosis, the studies on gray matter volume (GMV) predominantly reported volume loss compared with healthy controls (CON). However, other important morphological measurements such as cortical surface area (CSA) and cortical thickness (CT) were not systematically compared. So far, samples mostly comprised subjects at genetic risk or at clinical risk fulfilling an ultra-high risk (UHR) criterion. No studies comparing UHR subjects with at-risk subjects showing only basic symptoms (BS) investigated the differences in CSA or CT. Therefore, we aimed to unravel the contribution of the 2 morphometrical measures constituting the cortical volume (CV) and to test whether these groups inhere different morphometric features. We conducted a surface-based morphometric analysis in 34 CON, 46 BS, and 39 UHR to examine between-group differences in CV, CSA, and CT vertex-wise across the whole cortex. Compared with BS and CON, UHR individuals presented increased CV in frontal and parietal regions, which was driven by larger CSA. These groups did not differ in CT. Yet, at-risk subjects who later developed schizophrenia showed thinning in the occipital cortex. Furthermore, BS presented increased CSA compared with CON. Our results suggest that volumetric differences in UHR subjects are driven by CSA while CV loss in converters seems to be based on cortical thinning. We attribute the larger CSA in UHR to aberrant pruning representing a vulnerability to develop psychotic symptoms reflected in different levels of vulnerability for BS and UHR, and cortical thinning to a presumably stress-related cortical decomposition.

摘要

在有精神病风险的受试者中,关于灰质体积(GMV)的研究主要报告与健康对照组(CON)相比存在体积损失。然而,其他重要的形态测量,如皮质表面积(CSA)和皮质厚度(CT),并没有得到系统的比较。到目前为止,样本大多包括具有遗传风险或符合超高风险(UHR)标准的临床风险的受试者。没有研究比较仅表现出基本症状(BS)的 UHR 受试者和有风险的受试者,以调查 CSA 或 CT 的差异。因此,我们旨在揭示构成皮质体积(CV)的两种形态测量的贡献,并测试这些组是否具有不同的形态特征。我们对 34 名 CON、46 名 BS 和 39 名 UHR 进行了基于表面的形态计量学分析,以检查整个皮质的 CV、CSA 和 CT 顶点的组间差异。与 BS 和 CON 相比,UHR 个体在额区和顶区的 CV 增加,这是由更大的 CSA 驱动的。这些组在 CT 上没有差异。然而,后来发展为精神分裂症的有风险受试者的枕叶皮层变薄。此外,BS 与 CON 相比 CSA 增加。我们的研究结果表明,UHR 受试者的体积差异是由 CSA 驱动的,而转化者的 CV 损失似乎是基于皮质变薄。我们将 UHR 中的 CSA 归因于异常修剪,这代表了出现精神病症状的易感性,反映了 BS 和 UHR 的不同易感性水平,而皮质变薄则归因于可能与压力相关的皮质分解。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验