Yu Xing-Lin, Tang Rui, Xia Peng-Liang, Wang Bo, Feng Yi, Liu Tong-Xian
State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, and Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Crops in Northwestern Loess Plateau of Ministry of Agriculture, College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100 Shaanxi, China.
Hubei Tobacco Company Enshi State Co., Ltd., Enshi 445000, Hubei, China.
Insects. 2020 May 26;11(6):325. doi: 10.3390/insects11060325.
Natural enemy guilds normally forage for prey that is patchily distributed simultaneously. Previous studies have investigated the influence of conspecific interactions and prey distribution on the functional response of natural enemies. However, little is known about how prey distribution and heterospecific interactions between natural enemies could affect their foraging efficiency. We examined the effects of prey distribution (aggregate and uniform) and heterospecific interactions on the functional response of a predator, Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and a parasitoid, Aphidius gifuensis Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Type II functional responses were observed in all experiments. Functional response curves of single H. axyridis or A. gifuensis were higher in the aggregate treatment than in the uniform treatment when aphid densities were between 40-180 or 70-170, respectively. When comparing between aggregate and uniform treatments with the heterospecific enemy occurrence, no differences were found in the parasitism efficiency of A. gifuensis, while H. axyridis consumed more aphids in the aggregate treatment than in the uniform treatment when aphid densities were between 50-230. The functional response of individual was not affected by under two aphid distributions. However, the functional response of a single and the treatment when concurrently with overlapped in uniform treatment of above approximately 150 aphids. Our results indicate that the predation rate of was affected by aphid distribution, but was not affected by heterospecific interactions. The parasitism rate of was affected by aphid distribution, and by heterospecific interactions in both the aggregate and uniform treatments. Thus, to optimize the management efficiency of M. persicae, the combined use of H. axyridis and A. gifuensis should be considered when M. persicae is nearly uniformly distributed under relatively high density.
天敌群落通常会同时搜寻分布零散的猎物。以往的研究调查了种内相互作用和猎物分布对天敌功能反应的影响。然而,对于猎物分布以及天敌之间的种间相互作用如何影响它们的觅食效率,人们却知之甚少。我们研究了猎物分布(聚集型和均匀型)以及种间相互作用对捕食性天敌异色瓢虫(Harmonia axyridis (Pallas),鞘翅目:瓢虫科)和寄生性天敌日本蚜茧蜂(Aphidius gifuensis Ashmead,膜翅目:茧蜂科)对桃蚜(Myzus persicae (Sulzer),半翅目:蚜科)功能反应的影响。在所有实验中均观察到了II型功能反应。当蚜虫密度分别在40 - 180或70 - 170之间时,聚集处理下单只异色瓢虫或日本蚜茧蜂的功能反应曲线高于均匀处理。在有异种天敌存在的情况下,比较聚集处理和均匀处理时,日本蚜茧蜂的寄生效率没有差异,而异色瓢虫在蚜虫密度为50 - 230时,聚集处理下消耗的蚜虫比均匀处理下更多。在两种蚜虫分布情况下单只[此处原文缺失具体天敌名称]的功能反应不受[此处原文缺失具体天敌名称]的影响。然而,在上述约150只蚜虫的均匀处理中,当单只[此处原文缺失具体天敌名称]与[此处原文缺失具体天敌名称]同时存在时,其功能反应与处理情况重叠。我们的结果表明,异色瓢虫的捕食率受蚜虫分布影响,但不受种间相互作用影响。日本蚜茧蜂的寄生率受蚜虫分布影响,并且在聚集处理和均匀处理中均受种间相互作用影响。因此,为了优化桃蚜的管理效率,当桃蚜在相对高密度下近乎均匀分布时,应考虑联合使用异色瓢虫和日本蚜茧蜂。