Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Southampton University Hospital NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Retina. 2021 Feb 1;41(2):423-430. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002856.
To evaluate the visual outcome associated with intravitreal antibiotics (IVA) and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for acute postprocedure endophthalmitis.
Data from 237 eyes presenting with acute postprocedure endophthalmitis were collected from 57 retina specialists in 28 countries. All eyes were treated with IVA on the day of presentation. We classified eyes according to the method of treatment used as IVA and early PPV (IVA + PPV within 1 week of presentation) groups.
After exclusion of ineligible eyes, data from 204 eyes were analyzed. The mean (SD) age of patients was 62.7 (21.8) years and 69.3 (12.7) years in the IVA and PPV groups, respectively (P = 0.18). Endophthalmitis secondary to cataract, intravitreal injections, PPV, and other intraocular procedures represented 64.2%, 16.2%, 13.7%, and 5.9% of cases, respectively. Intravitreal antibiotics alone were administered in 55 eyes (27.0%), and early PPV was performed in 149 eyes (73.0%). No difference was found between groups in the final visual acuity of ≥20/60 (43.6%, 65 eyes vs. 34.5%, 19 eyes) and ≤counting fingers (30.9%, 46 eyes vs. 36.4%, 20 eyes) for IVA versus early PPV groups, respectively. Vision of light perception (odds ratio = 12.2; 95% confidence interval: 2.0-72.6) and retinal detachment (odds ratio = 7.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.5-409) at baseline were predictive of vision of ≤counting fingers. Retinal detachment at baseline (odds ratio = 20.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.1-372.1) was predictive of final retinal detachment status.
The current retrospective multicenter cohort of eyes with acute postprocedure endophthalmitis reports similar outcomes after treatment with IVA alone when compared with IVA and early PPV within 1 week of presentation.
评估玻璃体腔内抗生素(IVA)联合玻璃体切割术(PPV)治疗急性术后眼内炎的临床疗效。
本研究纳入了来自 28 个国家的 57 位眼底病专家的 237 只眼的临床资料。所有患眼均在就诊当天接受了 IVA 治疗。根据治疗方法的不同,我们将患眼分为单独 IVA 治疗组和 IVA+早期 PPV(就诊后 1 周内行 PPV)治疗组。
排除不适合入选的病例后,204 只眼纳入本研究。单独 IVA 治疗组和 IVA+早期 PPV 治疗组的患者平均年龄分别为 62.7(21.8)岁和 69.3(12.7)岁(P=0.18)。白内障术后、眼内注药、PPV 及其他眼内手术分别导致了 64.2%、16.2%、13.7%和 5.9%的眼内炎。55 只眼(27.0%)仅接受了 IVA 治疗,149 只眼(73.0%)接受了早期 PPV。两组患者的最终视力分别为≥20/60 的比例(43.6%,65 只眼 vs. 34.5%,19 只眼)和≤数指的比例(30.9%,46 只眼 vs. 36.4%,20 只眼)无显著差异。视力光感(比值比=12.2;95%置信区间:2.0-72.6)和术前视网膜脱离(比值比=7.7;95%置信区间:1.5-409)是术后视力≤数指的预测因素。术前视网膜脱离(比值比=20.4;95%置信区间:1.1-372.1)是术后视网膜脱离状态的预测因素。
本研究为回顾性多中心研究,报道了单独 IVA 治疗与 IVA+早期 PPV 治疗急性术后眼内炎的疗效相似。