Sreedev Chundangaparambil Pushpahasan, Raju Iswarya, Kumaravadivel Karthick, Mathew Sebeena, Thangavel Boopathi, Natesan Thangaraj Deepa
Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, MES Dental College, Malappuram, IND.
Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, KSR Institute of Dental Science and Research, Tiruchengode, IND.
Cureus. 2020 Apr 24;12(4):e7807. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7807.
Introduction The main objective of root canal treatment is to eliminate the micro-organism from the root canal system and three-dimensional obturation. The proper cleaning and shaping can be accomplished only by using appropriate instruments and effective irrigants during the root canal treatment. Aim To evaluate the influence of three different final irrigation regimen on depth of penetration of root canal sealers and push-out bond strength of obturation material. Materials and methods Thirty-six extracted single-rooted mandibular premolar human teeth with straight canals were decoronated and instrumented according to groups. Group I: Root canals were irrigated with 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), then irradiated with 980 nm diode laser (n = 12), Group II: Root canals were irrigated with 3% NaOCl, followed by 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (n = 12), Group III: Root canals were irrigated with 3% NaOCl, followed by 10% citric acid (n = 12). In each sample, single cone obturation was done with gutta-percha using AH plus sealer incorporated with rhodamine B dye. After seven days coronal, middle and apical thin cross sections were made for evaluation of dentinal tubule sealer penetration depth and pushout bond strength using confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) and universal testing machine, respectively. Statistical analysis among the three groups was done by using Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc test. Results Mean tubular penetration depth between diode laser (136.57 ± 48 µm), EDTA (130.56 ± 53 µm) and citric acid (113.37 ± 34 µm; P < 0.05) showed statistically highly significant results. Pushout bond strength did not differ significantly between diode laser (1.21 ± 0.48 Mpa), EDTA (1.05 ± 0.45 Mpa) and citric acid (0.93 ± 0.44 Mpa; P > 0.05). Conclusion Mean tubular penetration depth of AH plus sealer was better in diode laser than in EDTA and citric acid. Average push-out bond strength of obturation material did not differ significantly between diode laser, EDTA and citric acid.
引言 根管治疗的主要目标是清除根管系统中的微生物并进行三维充填。在根管治疗过程中,只有使用合适的器械和有效的冲洗剂才能实现恰当的清理和塑形。
目的 评估三种不同的最终冲洗方案对根管封闭剂渗透深度和充填材料推出粘结强度的影响。
材料与方法 选取36颗拔除的单根下颌前磨牙,根管笔直,去冠后按组进行预备。第一组:根管先用3%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)冲洗,然后用980nm二极管激光照射(n = 12);第二组:根管先用3% NaOCl冲洗,接着用17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)冲洗(n = 12);第三组:根管先用3% NaOCl冲洗,接着用10%柠檬酸冲洗(n = 12)。在每个样本中,使用含若丹明B染料的AH plus封闭剂,用牙胶进行单锥充填。七天后,制作冠部、中部和根尖部的薄切片,分别使用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)和万能试验机评估牙本质小管封闭剂渗透深度和推出粘结强度。三组之间的统计分析采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和事后检验。
结果 二极管激光组(136.57 ± 48 µm)、EDTA组(130.56 ± 53 µm)和柠檬酸组(113.37 ± 34 µm;P < 0.05)的平均小管渗透深度显示出统计学上的高度显著差异。二极管激光组(1.21 ± 0.48 Mpa)、EDTA组(1.05 ± 0.45 Mpa)和柠檬酸组(0.93 ± 0.44 Mpa;P > 0.05)的推出粘结强度无显著差异。
结论 AH plus封闭剂的平均小管渗透深度在二极管激光组中优于EDTA组和柠檬酸组。二极管激光组、EDTA组和柠檬酸组的充填材料平均推出粘结强度无显著差异。