Monash Health, 823-865 Centre RRoad, Melbourne, 3165, Australia.
St. Vincents Clinic, UNSW Sydney Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Oct;31(10):2137-2146. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04328-y. Epub 2020 May 28.
The aim was to compare objective and subjective cure rates between Uphold™ hysteropexy (HP) and vaginal hysterectomy (VH) with uterosacral suspension.
A sample size of 49 in each arm would be required to detect a clinical difference of 20% between the groups. Owing to delayed recruitment, this originally planned randomised controlled trial was changed to a patient preference study after randomising initial 6 participants. Women with symptomatic stage ≥2 uterine descent wishing a surgical solution were included. Routine follow-up was scheduled at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter. Primary outcome was absence of stage ≥2 apical prolapse. Secondary outcomes included a composite cure of no leading edge beyond the hymen, absence of bulge symptoms and no retreatment; patient-reported outcomes were based on quality-of-life questionnaires (PFDI-20, PFIQ-7, PISQ-12, PGI-I, EQ5D and a health score).
We recruited 50 patients undergoing VH between 2011 and 2013 and 51 patients undergoing HP between 2011 and 2016. Participants were followed up for a median of 25 months (23-96). Five women from the VH (10%) and 7 from the HP (14%) group were lost to follow-up. Combined anatomical and symptomatic outcomes were available for 41 (82%) VH and 39 (76%) in the HP group. There was no difference in objective apical outcomes; the incidence of stage 2 prolapse was 0% in the VH group and 2% in HP group (p = 0.50). We found no difference in the composite cure rate (78% VH vs 85% HP, 0.45) between the groups. There was no significant difference in surgical complications (p = 0.33), assessed using Clavien-Dindo classification. There was a 2% surgery rate for mesh exposure in the HP group.
Uphold™ uterine suspension and VH appear to have similar objective and subjective cure at 25 months, with no significant difference in surgical complications.
本研究旨在比较 Uphold™ 子宫固定术(HP)和阴道子宫切除术(VH)联合子宫骶骨悬吊术在客观和主观治愈率方面的差异。
每组需要 49 名样本量才能检测到两组之间 20%的临床差异。由于招募延迟,最初计划的随机对照试验在随机分配最初的 6 名参与者后改为患者偏好研究。本研究纳入了希望通过手术治疗的有症状的 2 期及以上子宫脱垂的女性。常规随访时间分别为术后 6 周、6 个月、12 个月和此后每年一次。主要结局为不存在 2 期及以上的 apical prolapse。次要结局包括无前缘超出处女膜、无膨出症状和无复发的复合治愈率;患者报告的结局基于生活质量问卷(PFDI-20、PFIQ-7、PISQ-12、PGI-I、EQ5D 和健康评分)。
我们招募了 2011 年至 2013 年期间接受 VH 的 50 名患者和 2011 年至 2016 年期间接受 HP 的 51 名患者。参与者的中位随访时间为 25 个月(23-96 个月)。VH 组有 5 名(10%)和 HP 组有 7 名(14%)患者失访。VH 组和 HP 组中分别有 41 名(82%)和 39 名(76%)患者可获得联合解剖学和症状学结局。客观的 apical 结局无差异;VH 组 2 期脱垂的发生率为 0%,HP 组为 2%(p=0.50)。两组间复合治愈率(VH 组为 78%,HP 组为 85%,0.45)无差异。使用 Clavien-Dindo 分类评估手术并发症,两组间无显著差异(p=0.33)。HP 组有 2%的网片暴露手术率。
Uphold™ 子宫悬吊术和 VH 在 25 个月时的客观和主观治愈率似乎相似,手术并发症无显著差异。