Detollenaere Renée J, den Boon Jan, Stekelenburg Jelle, IntHout Joanna, Vierhout Mark E, Kluivers Kirsten B, van Eijndhoven Hugo W F
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Isala, PO Box 10400, 8000 GK Zwolle, Netherlands Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Isala, PO Box 10400, 8000 GK Zwolle, Netherlands.
BMJ. 2015 Jul 23;351:h3717. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3717.
To investigate whether uterus preserving vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy is non-inferior to vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse.
Multicentre randomised controlled non-blinded non-inferiority trial.
4 non-university teaching hospitals, the Netherlands.
208 healthy women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher requiring surgery and no history of pelvic floor surgery.
Treatment with sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments. The predefined non-inferiority margin was an increase in surgical failure rate of 7%.
Primary outcome was recurrent prolapse stage 2 or higher of the uterus or vaginal vault (apical compartment) evaluated by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in combination with bothersome bulge symptoms or repeat surgery for recurrent apical prolapse at 12 months' follow-up. Secondary outcomes were overall anatomical recurrences, including recurrent anterior compartment (bladder) and/or posterior compartment (bowel) prolapse, functional outcome, complications, hospital stay, postoperative recovery, and sexual functioning.
Sacrospinous hysteropexy was non-inferior for anatomical recurrence of the apical compartment with bothersome bulge symptoms or repeat surgery (n=0, 0%) compared with vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments (n=4, 4.0%, difference -3.9%, 95% confidence interval for difference -8.6% to 0.7%). At 12 months, overall anatomical recurrences, functional outcome, quality of life, complications, hospital stay, measures on postoperative recovery, and sexual functioning did not differ between the two groups. Five serious adverse events were reported during hospital stay. None was considered to be related to the type of surgery.
Uterus preservation by sacrospinous hysteropexy was non-inferior to vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments for surgical failure of the apical compartment at 12 months' follow-up.
trialregister.nl NTR1866.
探讨保留子宫的阴道骶棘韧带固定术在子宫脱垂手术治疗中是否不劣于子宫骶韧带悬吊式阴式子宫切除术。
多中心随机对照非盲非劣效性试验。
荷兰4家非大学教学医院。
208名2期或更高期别的子宫脱垂健康女性,需要手术治疗且无盆底手术史。
采用骶棘韧带固定术或子宫骶韧带悬吊式阴式子宫切除术治疗。预先设定的非劣效性界值为手术失败率增加7%。
主要结局是在12个月随访时,通过盆腔器官脱垂定量系统评估子宫或阴道穹窿(顶端部分)复发脱垂至2期或更高期,并伴有令人烦恼的膨出症状,或因顶端复发脱垂而再次手术。次要结局包括总体解剖学复发,包括前盆腔(膀胱)和/或后盆腔(肠道)复发脱垂、功能结局、并发症、住院时间、术后恢复情况和性功能。
与子宫骶韧带悬吊式阴式子宫切除术相比,骶棘韧带固定术在顶端部分解剖学复发伴令人烦恼的膨出症状或再次手术方面不劣(骶棘韧带固定术组n = 0,0%;子宫骶韧带悬吊式阴式子宫切除术组n = 4,4.0%,差异-3.9%,差异的95%置信区间为-8.6%至0.7%)。在12个月时,两组在总体解剖学复发、功能结局、生活质量、并发症、住院时间、术后恢复指标和性功能方面无差异。住院期间报告了5例严重不良事件。均被认为与手术类型无关。
在12个月随访时,骶棘韧带固定术保留子宫在顶端部分手术失败方面不劣于子宫骶韧带悬吊式阴式子宫切除术。
trialregister.nl NTR1866