• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后住院时间、30 天再入院率与费用的相关性:一项全国再入院数据库分析。

Associations Between Hospital Length of Stay, 30-Day Readmission, and Costs in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Nationwide Readmissions Database Analysis.

机构信息

Weill Cornell Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Group (CORG) Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Weill Cornell Medicine New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.

Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging Department of Radiology Weill Cornell Medicine New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jun 2;9(11):e015503. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015503. Epub 2020 May 29.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.119.015503
PMID:32468933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7428974/
Abstract

Background Readmission after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) poses an enormous economic burden to the US healthcare system. There are limited data on the association between length of hospital stay (LOS), readmission rate, and overall costs in patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI. Methods and Results All STEMI hospitalizations were selected in the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2010 to 2014. From the patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention, we examined the 30-day outcomes including readmission, mortality, reinfarction, repeat revascularization, and hospital charges/costs according to LOS (1-2, 3, 4, 5, and >5 days) stratified by infarct locations. The 30-day readmission rate after percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI was 12.0% in the anterior wall (AW) STEMI group and 9.9% in the non-AW STEMI group. Patients with a very short LOS (1-2 days) were readmitted less frequently than those with a longer LOS regardless of infarct locations. However, patients with a very short LOS had significantly increased 30-day readmission mortality versus an LOS of 3 days (hazard ratio, 1.91; CI, 1.16-3.16 [=0.01]) only in the AW STEMI group. Total costs (index admission+readmission) were the lowest in the very short LOS cohort in both the AW STEMI group (<0.001) and the non-AW STEMI group (<0.001). Conclusions For patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI, a very short LOS was associated with significantly lower 30-day readmission and lower cumulative cost. However, a very short LOS was associated with higher 30-day mortality compared with at least a 3-day stay in the AW STEMI cohort.

摘要

背景

ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)再入院给美国医疗体系带来了巨大的经济负担。关于接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 STEMI 患者的住院时间(LOS)、再入院率和总费用之间的关系,数据有限。

方法和结果

从 2010 年至 2014 年,我们在全国再入院数据库中选择了所有 STEMI 住院患者。在接受直接 PCI 的患者中,我们根据梗死部位,按 LOS(1-2、3、4、5 和>5 天)分层,检查了 30 天结局,包括再入院、死亡率、再梗死、再次血运重建和住院费用/成本。在前壁 STEMI 组中,STEMI 患者接受 PCI 治疗后 30 天再入院率为 12.0%,非前壁 STEMI 组为 9.9%。无论梗死部位如何,LOS 较短(1-2 天)的患者再入院频率低于 LOS 较长的患者。然而,在前壁 STEMI 组中,LOS 非常短(1-2 天)的患者与 LOS 为 3 天的患者相比,30 天再入院死亡率显著增加(危险比,1.91;95%CI,1.16-3.16[=0.01])。在前壁 STEMI 组(<0.001)和非前壁 STEMI 组(<0.001),LOS 非常短的患者的总费用(指数入院+再入院)最低。

结论

对于接受直接 PCI 治疗的 STEMI 患者,LOS 非常短与 30 天再入院率显著降低和累计成本降低相关。然而,在前壁 STEMI 队列中,与至少 3 天的住院相比,LOS 非常短与 30 天死亡率较高相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc2c/7428974/3db11271f399/JAH3-9-e015503-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc2c/7428974/e3e2c2baeb7a/JAH3-9-e015503-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc2c/7428974/72b690d13ca0/JAH3-9-e015503-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc2c/7428974/91874177b37d/JAH3-9-e015503-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc2c/7428974/3db11271f399/JAH3-9-e015503-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc2c/7428974/e3e2c2baeb7a/JAH3-9-e015503-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc2c/7428974/72b690d13ca0/JAH3-9-e015503-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc2c/7428974/91874177b37d/JAH3-9-e015503-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc2c/7428974/3db11271f399/JAH3-9-e015503-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Associations Between Hospital Length of Stay, 30-Day Readmission, and Costs in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Nationwide Readmissions Database Analysis.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后住院时间、30 天再入院率与费用的相关性:一项全国再入院数据库分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jun 2;9(11):e015503. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015503. Epub 2020 May 29.
2
Thirty-Day Readmission Rates, Timing, Causes, and Costs after ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States: A National Readmission Database Analysis 2010-2014.美国 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者 30 天再入院率、时间、原因和费用:2010-2014 年全国再入院数据库分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Sep 18;7(18):e009863. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009863.
3
Predictors of Prolonged In-Hospital Stay After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后住院时间延长的预测因素
Angiology. 2016 Sep;67(8):756-61. doi: 10.1177/0003319715617075. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
4
Value-Based ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Care Using Risk-Guided Triage and Early Discharge.基于价值的ST段抬高型心肌梗死护理:采用风险导向分诊和早期出院
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Apr;11(4):e004553. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004553.
5
Comparison of In-Hospital Mortality, Length of Stay, Postprocedural Complications, and Cost of Single-Vessel Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Hemodynamically Stable Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from Nationwide Inpatient Sample [2006 to 2012]).血流动力学稳定的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者单支血管与多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的院内死亡率、住院时间、术后并发症及费用比较(来自全国住院患者样本[2006年至2012年])
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;118(7):950-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.06.057. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
6
Costs of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention.经桡动脉入路经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的成本。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):827-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.014. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
7
Burden of 30-Day Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in 833,344 Patients in the United States: Predictors, Causes, and Cost: Insights From the Nationwide Readmission Database.美国 833344 例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 30 天再入院负担:预测因素、原因和费用:来自全国再入院数据库的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 9;11(7):665-674. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.248.
8
Etiologies, trends, and predictors of readmission in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行多血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后再入院的病因、趋势和预测因素。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Dec 1;94(7):905-914. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28344. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
9
Readmissions in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock (from Nationwide Readmission Database).ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和心原性休克再入院(来自全国再入院数据库)。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Dec 15;124(12):1841-1850. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.08.048. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
10
Hospital length of stay and clinical outcomes in older STEMI patients after primary PCI: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,老年 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的住院时间和临床结局:来自全国心血管数据登记处的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 31;65(12):1161-1171. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.01.028.

引用本文的文献

1
CArdiovasculaR Outcomes Based Upon EjectIon Systolic TimE in Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (ARISE-STEMI) Study.基于ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者射血收缩期时间的心血管结局(ARISE-STEMI)研究
CJC Open. 2024 Nov 26;7(4):516-524. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.11.014. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Comparison of 30-Day Readmission Between Early and Late Catheter Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Pulmonary Embolism in the United States.美国急性肺栓塞早期与晚期导管定向溶栓治疗30天再入院情况比较
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Mar 27;12(4):118. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12040118.
3
Very early discharge of LOw-Risk ST elevation myocardial infarction patients after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (VEDLOR-STEMI) study.

本文引用的文献

1
Same-Day Discharge After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后当日出院。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jul 2;8(13):e012131. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012131. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
2
Regression to the Mean in the Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.医疗保险医院再入院减少计划中的均值回归
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Sep 1;179(9):1167-1173. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1004.
3
Temporal trends in the practice of the transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in a large tertiary center.
低风险ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者在成功进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的极早期出院(VEDLOR-STEMI)研究
Indian Heart J. 2025 Jul-Aug;77(4):308-310. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2025.04.002. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
4
Analysis of health outcomes in acute myocardial infarction: a value-based healthcare approach.急性心肌梗死健康结局分析:基于价值的医疗保健方法。
Rev Cuid. 2024 Jun 21;15(2):e3796. doi: 10.15649/cuidarte.3796. eCollection 2024 May-Aug.
5
The economic burden of ischaemic heart diseases on health systems: a systematic review.缺血性心脏病对卫生系统的经济负担:一项系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Feb 12;10(2):e015043. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015043.
6
Short term outcomes and resource utilization in versus acute on chronic heart failure related cardiogenic shock: a nationwide analysis.急性失代偿性心力衰竭与慢性心力衰竭相关心源性休克的短期结局及资源利用:一项全国性分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 9;11:1454884. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1454884. eCollection 2024.
7
Early Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Stress-Induced Cardiomyopathy Receiving Acute Mechanical Support in the US.美国应激性心肌病患者接受急性机械支持的早期临床结局
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Oct 9;2(6Part B):101185. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101185. eCollection 2023 Nov-Dec.
8
The Clinical and Economic Impact of Delayed Reperfusion Therapy: Real-World Evidence.延迟再灌注治疗的临床和经济影响:真实世界证据。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024 May 13;121(5):e20230650. doi: 10.36660/abc.20230650. eCollection 2024.
9
Is Electronic Information Exchange Associated With Lower 30-Day Readmission Charges Among Medicare Beneficiaries?电子信息交换是否与医疗保险受益人的 30 天再入院费用降低有关?
Med Care. 2024 Jun 1;62(6):423-430. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002003. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
10
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Financial Impact of 30-Day Readmissions for Selected Medical Conditions: A Focus on Hospital Quality Performance.特定医疗状况30天再入院财务影响的系统评价与Meta分析:聚焦医院质量绩效
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 29;12(7):750. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12070750.
在一家大型三级中心,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中行桡动脉入路的实践中的时间趋势。
Coron Artery Dis. 2020 Jan;31(1):40-48. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000764.
4
Improving Care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012.2008 年至 2012 年美国改善 STEMI 患者的护理
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jan 8;8(1):e008096. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008096.
5
Association of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program With Mortality Among Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized for Heart Failure, Acute Myocardial Infarction, and Pneumonia.医院再入院率降低计划与医疗保险受益人因心力衰竭、急性心肌梗死和肺炎住院的死亡率之间的关联。
JAMA. 2018 Dec 25;320(24):2542-2552. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19232.
6
Thirty-Day Readmission Rates, Timing, Causes, and Costs after ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States: A National Readmission Database Analysis 2010-2014.美国 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者 30 天再入院率、时间、原因和费用:2010-2014 年全国再入院数据库分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Sep 18;7(18):e009863. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009863.
7
Length of stay following percutaneous coronary intervention: An expert consensus document update from the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的住院时间:心血管血管造影和介入学会的专家共识文件更新。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct 1;92(4):717-731. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27637. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
8
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2018年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2018 Mar 20;137(12):e67-e492. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
9
Trends in Length of Hospital Stay and the Impact on Prognosis of Early Discharge After a First Uncomplicated Acute Myocardial Infarction.首次无并发症急性心肌梗死患者的住院时间趋势及早期出院对预后的影响
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Feb 15;121(4):397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
10
Thirty-Day Readmission Rate and Costs After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: A National Readmission Database Analysis.美国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的 30 天再入院率和费用:全国再入院数据库分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec;10(12). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005925.