Schulich Heart Centre Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre University of Toronto Ontario Canada.
Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre St. Michael's Hospital University of Toronto Ontario Canada.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jul 2;8(13):e012131. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012131. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
Background To manage overcrowding and bed shortages in Canadian hospitals, same-day discharge (SDD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has emerged as a solution to improve resource utilization. However, limited information exists regarding current trends, hospital variation, and safety of SDD PCI in Canada. Methods and Results We evaluated outpatients undergoing elective PCI in Ontario, Canada, from October 2008 to March 2016. SDD was defined when patients were discharged on the day of PCI, and non-SDD was defined as those patients who had 1 overnight stay. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause death or hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome. Inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity score was used to account for differences in baseline and clinical characteristics between SDD and non-SDD groups. Among 35 972 patients who underwent elective PCI at 17 PCI centers in Ontario, 10 801 patients (30%) had SDD PCI and 25 121 patients (70%) had non-SDD PCI. Substantial hospital variation for SDD PCI was observed, ranging from 0% to 87% during the study period. In the propensity-weighted cohort, SDD patients had no significant difference in 30-day rates of death or hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (1.3% versus 1.6%; hazard ratio: 0.84 [95% CI, 0.65-1.08]; P=0.17) compared with non-SDD patients. SDD and non-SDD patients also had no significant difference in 30-day rates of mortality or coronary revascularization. Conclusions In this large population-based cohort of elective PCI patients, we demonstrated the safety of SDD PCI. Increased adoption of this strategy could lead to improved bed-flow efficiency and substantial savings for the Canadian healthcare system without comprising outcomes.
为了应对加拿大医院的人满为患和床位短缺问题,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的当日出院(SDD)已成为提高资源利用效率的一种解决方案。然而,关于加拿大目前的趋势、医院间的差异以及 SDD PCI 的安全性,相关信息有限。
我们评估了 2008 年 10 月至 2016 年 3 月在加拿大安大略省接受择期 PCI 的门诊患者。SDD 的定义为患者在 PCI 当天出院,而非 SDD 的定义为患者有 1 晚的住院时间。主要结局为 30 天内全因死亡或因急性冠状动脉综合征住院。采用倾向评分逆概率治疗加权法来考虑 SDD 和非 SDD 组之间的基线和临床特征差异。在安大略省 17 个 PCI 中心接受择期 PCI 的 35972 名患者中,有 10801 名(30%)患者接受了 SDD PCI,25121 名(70%)患者接受了非 SDD PCI。研究期间,SDD PCI 的医院间差异很大,范围从 0%到 87%。在倾向评分加权队列中,SDD 患者与非 SDD 患者相比,30 天内死亡或因急性冠状动脉综合征住院的发生率无显著差异(1.3%对 1.6%;风险比:0.84 [95%CI,0.65-1.08];P=0.17)。SDD 和非 SDD 患者在 30 天内的死亡率或冠状动脉血运重建率也无显著差异。
在这项大型基于人群的择期 PCI 患者队列中,我们证明了 SDD PCI 的安全性。这种策略的广泛应用可以提高床位流动效率,并为加拿大医疗保健系统带来显著节省,而不会影响结果。