• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留子宫手术对Ⅰ期原发性黏液性卵巢上皮癌的影响:一项基于倾向评分加权分析的多机构研究。

Impact of uterus-preserving surgery on Stage I primary mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma: A multi-institutional study with propensity score-weighted analysis.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, Toyohashi, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Aug;150(2):177-183. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13244. Epub 2020 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1002/ijgo.13244
PMID:32469080
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical characteristics of women with Stage I primary mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma (mEOC) and evaluate the impact of uterus-preserving surgery (UPS) in terms of survival prognosis.

METHODS

A regional multi-institutional retrospective study conducted between January 1986 and March 2017 by reviewing records of the Tokai Ovarian Tumor Study Group. Clinical and pathologic data and survival outcomes were assessed for women with Stage I primary mEOC. The baseline imbalance between women with and those without UPS was adjusted by an inverse probability of treatment weighting method using the propensity score (PS) of independent clinical variables.

RESULTS

Among 4730 women with malignant ovarian tumors, 185 had Stage I primary mEOC and were included in the study. The mean age was 47.6 years (range 12-87 years), and 56 (30.3%) women underwent UPS. After PS-based adjustment, women in the UPS group did not have a poorer prognosis regarding overall survival (P=0.776) or recurrence-free survival (P=0.683). Even after age stratification, there was no statistical difference in survival outcomes between the UPS and non-UPS groups.

CONCLUSION

UPS was not associated with decreased survival and may be a treatment option for women with Stage I primary mEOC irrespective of age.

摘要

目的

研究Ⅰ期原发性黏液性卵巢上皮癌(mEOC)女性的临床特征,并评估保留子宫手术(UPS)在生存预后方面的影响。

方法

本研究是一项于 1986 年 1 月至 2017 年 3 月间由东海卵巢肿瘤研究组进行的区域多机构回顾性研究,评估了Ⅰ期原发性 mEOC 女性的临床和病理数据及生存结局。采用倾向评分(PS)对 UPS 组与非 UPS 组之间的独立临床变量进行逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)调整,以校正基线不平衡。

结果

在 4730 例患有恶性卵巢肿瘤的女性中,185 例患有Ⅰ期原发性 mEOC 并纳入研究。患者的平均年龄为 47.6 岁(范围 12-87 岁),56 例(30.3%)女性接受了 UPS。经过 PS 校正后,UPS 组的总生存(P=0.776)或无复发生存(P=0.683)预后均未见明显变差。即使进行年龄分层后,UPS 组和非 UPS 组的生存结局也无统计学差异。

结论

UPS 并不与生存预后降低相关,对于Ⅰ期原发性 mEOC 患者,不论年龄大小,UPS 都可能是一种治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Impact of uterus-preserving surgery on Stage I primary mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma: A multi-institutional study with propensity score-weighted analysis.保留子宫手术对Ⅰ期原发性黏液性卵巢上皮癌的影响:一项基于倾向评分加权分析的多机构研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Aug;150(2):177-183. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13244. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
2
Prognostic impact of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on clinically-apparent stage I primary mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a multi-institutional study with propensity score-weighted analysis.盆腔和腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术对临床Ⅰ期原发性黏液性上皮性卵巢癌预后的影响:一项采用倾向评分加权分析的多机构研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 17;50(2):145-151. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz163.
3
Does complete-staging lymphadenectomy improve survival outcomes in stage I endometrioid epithelial ovarian carcinoma? A multi-institutional retrospective study with propensity score-weighted analysis.完全分期淋巴结切除术是否能改善 I 期子宫内膜样上皮性卵巢癌的生存结局?一项采用倾向评分加权分析的多机构回顾性研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 3;51(3):387-392. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa206.
4
Mucinous borderline ovarian tumor versus invasive well-differentiated mucinous ovarian cancer: Difference in characteristics and outcomes.黏液性交界性卵巢肿瘤与浸润性高分化黏液性卵巢癌:特征和结局的差异。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 May;153(2):230-237. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
5
Prognostic factors and effects of fertility-sparing surgery in women of reproductive age with ovarian clear-cell carcinoma: a propensity score analysis.生殖年龄女性卵巢透明细胞癌保留生育功能手术的预后因素及疗效:倾向评分分析。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Nov;30(6):e102. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e102.
6
Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Stage I Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.Ⅰ期上皮性卵巢癌的保留生育功能手术
Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jul 1;144(1):68-78. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005530. Epub 2024 May 23.
7
Is standard radical surgery necessary for elderly patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma? ~Propensity score matched analysis~.老年早期上皮性卵巢癌患者行标准根治性手术是否必要?~倾向评分匹配分析~。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 7;50(4):411-418. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz194.
8
Survival impact of capsule status in stage I ovarian mucinous carcinoma-A mulicentric retrospective study.Ⅰ期卵巢黏液性癌中包膜状态对生存的影响——一项多中心回顾性研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Mar;234:131-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
9
Factors affecting the long-term prognosis of patients in the AYA generation with epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicenter propensity score matching analysis.影响 AYA 代上皮性卵巢癌患者长期预后的因素:一项多中心倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Sep;166(3):1225-1231. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15479. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
10
Oncologic outcomes of uterine preservation for pre-menopausal patients with stage II epithelial ovarian carcinoma.绝经前 II 期上皮性卵巢癌患者保留子宫的肿瘤学结局。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Mar;31(3):480-483. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001747.

引用本文的文献

1
The prognostic value of growth pattern-based grading for mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC): a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于生长模式的分级对黏液性卵巢癌(MOC)的预后价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2025 Mar 31;15:1541572. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1541572. eCollection 2025.
2
Rare Epithelial Ovarian Cancers: Low Grade Serous and Mucinous Carcinomas.罕见的上皮性卵巢癌:低级别浆液性和黏液性癌。
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2023 Sep 1;13(9):a038190. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a038190.
3
Oncological and Reproductive Outcomes After Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Stage I Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma.
I期黏液性卵巢癌保留生育功能手术后的肿瘤学及生殖结局
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 4;12:856818. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.856818. eCollection 2022.