School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Lotsearch, 3/68 Alfred Street, Milsons Point, NSW, 2061, Australia.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2020 Jun;155:111129. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111129. Epub 2020 May 12.
Ten global harbours were assessed for sediment quality by quantifying the magnitude of anthropogenic change and ecological risk. Anthropogenic change (enrichment) was high for Derwent River and Sydney estuary, moderate for Santander Harbour, Rio de Janeiro and Dublin Port, slight for Hong Kong, minimal for Darwin. All 10 enrichment indices used showed similar results. Derwent River sediment was rated at high ecological risk, followed by Sydney and Santander estuaries with moderate risk. Auckland and Darwin sediments exhibited minimal ecological risk and sediment in the remaining harbours (Dublin, Hong Kong, Ravenna, Ria de Vigo and Rio de Janeiro) were assessed at slight ecological risk. The extraordinary variety of environments and types/quantities/qualities of data investigated resulted in as much a critique and development of methodology, as an assessment of human impact, including unique techniques for elemental normalisation and contaminant classification. Recommendations for an improved technical framework for sediment quality assessment are provided.
通过量化人为变化和生态风险的程度,对全球十个港口的沉积物质量进行了评估。德文特河和悉尼港的人为变化(富营养化)程度很高,桑坦德港、里约热内卢和都柏林港的人为变化程度为中度,香港的人为变化程度为轻度,达尔文港的人为变化程度最小。使用的所有 10 种富营养化指数都得出了相似的结果。德文特河沉积物的生态风险被评为高,其次是悉尼和桑坦德河口,生态风险为中度。奥克兰和达尔文的沉积物显示出最小的生态风险,其余港口(都柏林、香港、拉文纳、维哥湾和里约热内卢)的沉积物则被评估为轻度生态风险。研究的环境和数据类型/数量/质量的非凡多样性不仅对人类影响进行了评估,还对方法进行了批判和发展,包括用于元素归一化和污染物分类的独特技术。为改进沉积物质量评估的技术框架提供了建议。