Shtein Ilana, Koyfman Alex, Schwartz Amnon, Popper Zoë A, Bar-On Benny
Eastern R&D Center, Ariel 4077625, Israel.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel.
Plants (Basel). 2020 May 27;9(6):678. doi: 10.3390/plants9060678.
Self-supporting plants and climbers exhibit differences in their structural and biomechanical properties. We hypothesized that such fundamental differences originate at the level of the material properties. In this study, we compared three non-woody members of the Solanales exhibiting different growth habits: (1) a self-supporting plant (potato, ), (2) a trailing plant (sweet potato, ), and (3) a twining climber (morning glory, ). The mechanical properties investigated by materials analyses were combined with structural, biochemical, and immunohistochemical analyses. Generally, the plants exhibited large morphological differences, but possessed relatively similar anatomy and cell wall composition. The cell walls were primarily composed of hemicelluloses (~60%), with α-cellulose and pectins constituting ~25% and 5%-8%, respectively. Immunohistochemistry of specific cell wall components suggested only minor variation in the occurrence and localization between the species, although some differences in hemicellulose distribution were observed. According to tensile and flexural tests, potato stems were the stiffest by a significant amount and the morning glory stems were the most compliant and showed differences in two- and three-orders of magnitude; the differences between their effective Young's (Elastic) modulus values (geometry-independent parameter), on the other hand, were substantially lower (at the same order of magnitude) and sometimes not even significantly different. Therefore, although variability exists in the internal anatomy and cell wall composition between the different species, the largest differences were seen in the morphology, which appears to be the primary determinant of biomechanical function. Although this does not exclude the possibility of different mechanisms in other plant groups, there is apparently less constraint to modifying stem morphology than anatomy and cell wall composition within the Solanales.
自支撑植物和攀缘植物在其结构和生物力学特性上存在差异。我们推测这种根本差异源于材料特性层面。在本研究中,我们比较了茄目三种具有不同生长习性的非木质植物:(1)一种自支撑植物(马铃薯),(2)一种蔓生植物(甘薯),以及(3)一种缠绕攀缘植物(牵牛)。通过材料分析研究的力学性能与结构、生化和免疫组织化学分析相结合。总体而言,这些植物表现出较大的形态差异,但具有相对相似的解剖结构和细胞壁组成。细胞壁主要由半纤维素(约60%)组成,α-纤维素和果胶分别占约25%和5%-8%。特定细胞壁成分的免疫组织化学表明,尽管观察到半纤维素分布存在一些差异,但物种之间在出现和定位方面仅存在微小变化。根据拉伸和弯曲试验,马铃薯茎的硬度明显最高,牵牛茎最柔韧,两者在两到三个数量级上存在差异;另一方面,它们的有效杨氏(弹性)模量值(与几何形状无关的参数)之间的差异要小得多(处于同一数量级),有时甚至没有显著差异。因此,尽管不同物种之间的内部解剖结构和细胞壁组成存在变异性,但最大的差异体现在形态上,形态似乎是生物力学功能的主要决定因素。虽然这并不排除其他植物类群存在不同机制的可能性,但在茄目内,改变茎的形态显然比改变解剖结构和细胞壁组成受到的限制更少。