Suppr超能文献

床边超声引导急诊科非选择性患者管理策略的改变:一项前瞻性单盲观察性试验。

Point-of-care ultrasound induced changes in management of unselected patients in the emergency department - a prospective single-blinded observational trial.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Regional Hospital Herning, Herning, Denmark.

Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 161 (J 103), 8200, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 May 29;28(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00740-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Point-of-Care ultrasound (POCUS) changes the management in specific groups of patients in the Emergency Department (ED). It seems intuitive that POCUS holds an unexploited potential on a wide variety of patients. However, little is known about the effect of ultrasound on the broad spectrum of unselected patients in the ED. This study aimed to identify the effect on the clinical management if POCUS was applied on unselected patients. Secondarily the study aimed to identify predictors of ultrasound changing management.

METHODS

This study was a blinded observational single center trial. A basic whole body POCUS protocol was performed in extension to the physical examination. The blinded treating physicians were interviewed about the presumptive diagnosis and plan for the patient. Subsequently the physicians were unblinded to the POCUS results and asked to choose between five options regarding the benefit from POCUS results.

RESULTS

A total of 403 patients were enrolled in this study. The treating physicians regarded POCUS examinations influence on the diagnostic workup or treatment as following: 1) No new information: 249 (61.8%), 2) No further action: 45 (11.2%), 3) Further diagnostic workup needed: 52 (12.9%), 4) Presumptive diagnosis confirmed 38 (9.4%), and 5) Immediate treatment needed: 19 (4.7%). Predictors of beneficial ultrasound were: (a) triage > 1, (b) patient comorbidities (cardiac disease, hypertension or lung disease), or (c) patients presenting with abdominal pain, dyspnea, or syncope.

CONCLUSION

POCUS was found to be potentially beneficial in 27.0% of all patients. High triage score, known cardiac disease, hypertension, pulmonary diseases, a clinical presentation with abdominal pain, dyspnea, or syncope are predictors of this. Future research should focus on patient-important outcomes when applying POCUS on these patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trail was registered prior to patient inclusion with the Danish Data Protection Agency (https://www.datatilsynet.dk/ Case no: 1-16-02-603-14) and Clinical Trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov/ Protocol ID: DNVK1305018).

摘要

背景

床边超声(POCUS)改变了急诊科(ED)特定患者群体的治疗方法。似乎直观地认为,POCUS 在广泛的患者中具有未被开发的潜力。然而,对于 ED 中未选择的患者,超声对其的影响知之甚少。本研究旨在确定 POCUS 应用于未选择的患者时对临床管理的影响。其次,本研究旨在确定超声改变管理的预测因素。

方法

本研究为一项盲法观察性单中心试验。在体格检查的基础上进行了基本的全身 POCUS 检查。对接受治疗的医生进行了关于患者的初步诊断和治疗计划的访谈。随后,医生们对 POCUS 结果进行了揭盲,并被要求在五个选项中选择是否受益于 POCUS 结果。

结果

共有 403 名患者纳入本研究。治疗医生认为 POCUS 检查对诊断性检查或治疗的影响如下:1)无新信息:249 例(61.8%),2)无需进一步行动:45 例(11.2%),3)需要进一步诊断性检查:52 例(12.9%),4)初步诊断得到确认:38 例(9.4%),5)需要立即治疗:19 例(4.7%)。超声有益的预测因素包括:1)分诊>1,2)患者合并症(心脏病、高血压或肺部疾病),或 3)出现腹痛、呼吸困难或晕厥的患者。

结论

POCUS 在所有患者中的潜在益处为 27.0%。高分诊评分、已知的心脏病、高血压、肺部疾病、腹痛、呼吸困难或晕厥的临床表现是这种情况的预测因素。未来的研究应重点关注在这些患者中应用 POCUS 时对患者重要的结果。

试验注册

在患者入组前,该试验已向丹麦数据保护局(https://www.datatilsynet.dk/ Case no: 1-16-02-603-14)和临床试验(www.clinicaltrials.gov/ Protocol ID:DNVK1305018)进行了注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0167/7260768/fb2f3564ee20/13049_2020_740_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验