Suppr超能文献

腰椎平片依据 Castellvi 分类原则对腰骶移行椎类型的识别不可靠。

Lumbar plain radiograph is not reliable to identify lumbosacral transitional vertebra types according to Castellvi classification principle.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the sixth Medical Center of PLA Army General Hospital, NO.6 Fucheng Road, Beijing, 100048, China.

Department of Radiology, The sixth Medical Center of PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 May 29;21(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03358-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The anteroposterior view of the lumbar plain radiograph (AP-LPR) was chosen as the original and first radiographic tool to determine and classify lumbosacral transitional vertebra with morphological abnormality (MA-LSTV) according to the Castellvi classification. However, recent studies found that AP-LPR might not be sufficient to detect or classify MA-LSTV correctly. The present study aims to verify the reliability of AP-LPR on detecting and classifying MA-LSTV types, taking coronal reconstructed CT images (CT-CRIs) as the gold criteria.

METHODS

Patients with suspected MA-LSTVs determined by AP-LPR were initially enrolled. Among them, those who received CT-CRIs were formally enrolled to verify the sensitivity of AP-LPR on detecting and classifying MA-LSTV types according to the Castellvi classification principle.

RESULTS

A total of 298 cases were initially enrolled as suspected MA-LSTV, among which 91 cases who received CT-CRIs were enrolled into the final study group. All suspected MA-LSTVs were verified to be real MA-LSTVs by CT-CRIs. However, 35.2% of the suspected MA-LSTV types judged by AP-LPR were not consistent with the final types judged by CT-CRIs. Two suspected type IIIa and 20 suspected type IIIb MA-LSTVs were verified to be true, while 9 of 39 suspected type IIa, 9 and 3 of 17 suspected type IIb, and 11 of 13 suspected type IV MA-LSTVs were verified to truly be type IIIa, IIIb, IV and IIIb MA-LSTVs by CT-CRIs, respectively. Incomplete joint-like structure (JLS) or bony union structure (BUS) and remnants of sclerotic band (RSB) between the transverse process (TP) and sacrum were considered to be the main reasons for misclassification.

CONCLUSION

Although AP-LPR could correctly detect MA-LSTV, it could not give accurate type classification. CT-CRIs could provide detailed information between the TP and sacrum area and could be taken as the gold standard to detect and classify MA-LSTV.

摘要

背景

腰椎平片前后位(AP-LPR)被选为最初的影像学工具,用于根据 Castellvi 分类确定和分类具有形态异常的腰骶移行椎(MA-LSTV)。然而,最近的研究发现,AP-LPR 可能不足以正确检测或分类 MA-LSTV。本研究旨在验证 AP-LPR 检测和分类 MA-LSTV 类型的可靠性,以冠状重建 CT 图像(CT-CRIs)为金标准。

方法

首先纳入通过 AP-LPR 确定为疑似 MA-LSTV 的患者。其中,接受 CT-CRIs 的患者正式纳入,以根据 Castellvi 分类原则验证 AP-LPR 检测和分类 MA-LSTV 类型的敏感性。

结果

共纳入 298 例疑似 MA-LSTV 的患者,其中 91 例接受 CT-CRIs 的患者纳入最终研究组。所有疑似 MA-LSTV 均通过 CT-CRIs 证实为真正的 MA-LSTV。然而,AP-LPR 判定的 35.2%疑似 MA-LSTV 类型与 CT-CRIs 最终判定的类型不一致。2 例疑似 IIIa 型和 20 例疑似 IIIb 型 MA-LSTV 被证实为真,而 39 例疑似 IIa 型中有 9 例、17 例疑似 IIb 型中有 9 例和 3 例、13 例疑似 IV 型中有 11 例被证实为真正的 IIIa、IIIb、IV 和 IIIb 型 MA-LSTV。不完全关节样结构(JLS)或骨融合结构(BUS)和横突(TP)与骶骨之间的硬化带(RSB)残留物被认为是分类错误的主要原因。

结论

虽然 AP-LPR 可以正确检测 MA-LSTV,但不能进行准确的类型分类。CT-CRIs 可以提供 TP 和骶骨区域之间的详细信息,可作为检测和分类 MA-LSTV 的金标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba2/7260820/389d437958fc/12891_2020_3358_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验