• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用模糊意图敌意问卷评估脑损伤后的消极归因。

Assessing Negative Attributions After Brain Injury With the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire.

机构信息

Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Drs Neumann and Hammond) and Biostatistics (Dr Perkins and Ms Bhamidipalli), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis; Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis (Drs Neumann and Hammond); Division of Clinical Neuropsychology and Rehabilitation Psychology, H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine and Harris Health System, Houston, Texas; Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston, Texas (Dr Sander); Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Ms Witwer); and Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler (Dr Combs).

出版信息

J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2020 Sep/Oct;35(5):E450-E457. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000581.

DOI:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000581
PMID:32472838
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

(1) To explore the construct validity of the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ) in participants with traumatic brain injury (TBI) (ie, confirm negative attributions are associated with anger and aggression); and (2) use the AIHQ to examine negative attribution differences between participants with and without TBI.

SETTING

Two rehabilitation hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-five adults with TBI and 86 healthy controls (HCs).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

MAIN MEASURES

The AIHQ, a measure of negative attributions (intent, hostility, and blame), anger, and aggressive responses to hypothetical scenarios.

RESULTS

Attributions were significantly correlated with anticipated anger and aggressive responses to AIHQ scenarios. Compared with HCs, participants with TBI reported stronger negative attributions (P ≤ .001), anger (P = .021), and aggressive responses (P = .002) to the scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Negative attributions were associated with anger and aggression responses, demonstrating construct validity of the AIHQ in the TBI population. Participants with TBI judged others' behaviors more severely than HCs, similar to prior research using a different attribution measure. The AIHQ has promise as a practical instrument for assessing negative attributions after TBI.

摘要

目的

(1)在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者中探索模糊意图敌意问卷(AIHQ)的结构效度(即,确认负面归因与愤怒和攻击有关);(2)使用 AIHQ 检查 TBI 患者与无 TBI 患者之间的负面归因差异。

地点

两家康复医院。

参与者

85 名 TBI 成年患者和 86 名健康对照者(HCs)。

设计

横断面调查。

主要措施

AIHQ,一种衡量负面归因(意图、敌意和责备)、愤怒和对假设情景的攻击反应的工具。

结果

归因与对 AIHQ 情景的预期愤怒和攻击反应显著相关。与 HCs 相比,TBI 患者对情景的负面归因(P ≤.001)、愤怒(P =.021)和攻击反应(P =.002)更强。

结论

负面归因与愤怒和攻击反应相关,表明 AIHQ 在 TBI 人群中具有结构效度。与使用不同归因测量工具的先前研究类似,TBI 患者比 HCs 更严厉地判断他人的行为。AIHQ 有望成为评估 TBI 后负面归因的实用工具。

相似文献

1
Assessing Negative Attributions After Brain Injury With the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire.使用模糊意图敌意问卷评估脑损伤后的消极归因。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2020 Sep/Oct;35(5):E450-E457. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000581.
2
Evaluating Negative Attributions in Persons With Brain Injury: A Comparison of 2 Measures.评估脑损伤患者的消极归因:两种测量方法的比较。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021;36(3):E170-E177. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000635.
3
Negative Attribution Bias and Anger After Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤后的负性归因偏差与愤怒
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2017 May/Jun;32(3):197-204. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000259.
4
The association of negative attributions with irritation and anger after brain injury.脑损伤后消极归因与愤怒和恼怒的关联。
Rehabil Psychol. 2015 May;60(2):155-61. doi: 10.1037/rep0000036.
5
Negative Attribution Bias and Related Risk Factors After Brain Injury.脑损伤后的消极归因偏差及相关危险因素。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021;36(1):E61-E70. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000600.
6
Perspective training to treat anger problems after brain injury: Two case studies.用于治疗脑损伤后愤怒问题的视角训练:两个案例研究。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Jun 18;39(1):153-62. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161347.
7
Improving measurement of attributional style in schizophrenia; A psychometric evaluation of the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ).改善精神分裂症归因风格的测量;模糊意图敌意问卷(AIHQ)的心理测量学评估。
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Jun;89:48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
8
What Does the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire Really Measure? The Importance of Context in Evaluating Hostility Bias.《敌意问卷的模糊意图究竟测量了什么?评估敌意偏差时背景的重要性》
J Pers Assess. 2020 Mar-Apr;102(2):205-213. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1525389. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
9
Analyze This! Thematic Analysis: Hostility, Attribution of Intent, and Interpersonal Perception Bias.分析一下!主题分析:敌意、意图归因和人际感知偏差。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Feb;36(3-4):1068-1091. doi: 10.1177/0886260517739890. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
10
Retrieval of negative autobiographical memories is associated with hostile attributions in ambiguous situations amongst people with schizophrenia.检索消极的自传体记忆与精神分裂症患者在模棱两可的情况下产生敌意归因有关。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 29;9(1):12564. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49058-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Hostile Attribution Bias Shapes Neural Synchrony in the Left Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex during Ambiguous Social Narratives.在模糊的社会叙述中,敌意归因偏差塑造了左腹内侧前额叶皮层的神经同步。
J Neurosci. 2024 Feb 28;44(9):e1252232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1252-23.2024.