Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Aydin State Hospital.
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin.
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Oct;31(7):1967-1970. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006537.
To investigate the comparative efficacy of electro-acupuncture when added to standard therapy in patients with Bell palsy in terms of clinical and neurophysiologic outcomes.
A total of 88 patients with Bell palsy who received standard treatment (ST group; n = 40, mean ± standard deviation age: 39.2 ± 6.6 years, 60.0% were males) or standard treatment plus electro-acupuncture (ST-EA group; n = 48, mean ± standard deviation age: 39.5 ± 6.9 years, 58.3% were males) were included. Data on patient demographics, symptoms, comorbidities, and 3-month outcomes on treatment response assessed via House-Brackmann grading system and facial nerve recovery profile and electromyography were recorded.
Application of ST-EA versus ST was associated with a significantly higher rate of normal nerve function on 12th week electromyography (66.7% versus 25.0%, P = 0.020), higher frequency of patients with House-Brackmann grade ≤2 in the 3rd week (79.2% versus 45.0%, P = 0.029), 6th week (87.5% versus 45.0%, P = 0.004), and 12th week (95.8% versus 50.0%, P = 0.001), and those with facial nerve recovery profile scores ≥8 in the 6th week (83.3% versus 45.0%, P = 0.011) and 12th week (87.5% versus 50.0%, P = 0.009) of treatment.
In conclusion, our findings in patients with Bell palsy revealed superiority of electro-acupuncture added to standard therapy over standard therapy alone in terms of improvement of nerve dysfunction, decrease in paralysis severity, and better functional recovery. This seems to indicate the likelihood of electro-acupuncture to be a safe and promising adjunct in the achievement of more satisfactory clinical outcomes in the management of Bell palsy when used in combination with standard medical and physiotherapy.
研究电针对贝尔面瘫患者的临床和神经生理结局的影响,比较其与标准治疗的疗效。
共纳入 88 例接受标准治疗(ST 组,n=40,平均年龄±标准差:39.2±6.6 岁,60.0%为男性)或标准治疗加电针(ST-EA 组,n=48,平均年龄±标准差:39.5±6.9 岁,58.3%为男性)的贝尔面瘫患者。记录患者的人口统计学数据、症状、合并症以及 3 个月的治疗反应,通过 House-Brackmann 分级系统和面神经恢复图以及肌电图评估。
与 ST 组相比,ST-EA 组在第 12 周肌电图上正常神经功能的比例明显更高(66.7%比 25.0%,P=0.020),第 3 周 House-Brackmann 分级≤2 的患者比例更高(79.2%比 45.0%,P=0.029),第 6 周(87.5%比 45.0%,P=0.004)和第 12 周(95.8%比 50.0%,P=0.001),第 6 周(83.3%比 45.0%,P=0.011)和第 12 周(87.5%比 50.0%,P=0.009)面神经恢复图评分≥8 的患者比例更高。
在贝尔面瘫患者中,电针联合标准治疗在改善神经功能障碍、减轻瘫痪严重程度和更好的功能恢复方面优于单纯标准治疗。这似乎表明,电针在与标准医学和物理治疗结合使用时,可能是一种安全且有前途的辅助手段,可提高贝尔面瘫的治疗效果。