Stroboscopic Vision as a Dynamic Sensory Reweighting Alternative to the Sensory Organization Test.

CONTEXT

The sensory organization test (SOT) is a standard for quantifying sensory dependence via sway-referenced conditions (sway-referenced support and sway-referenced vision [SRV]). However, the SOT is limited to expensive equipment. Thus, a practical version of the SOT is more commonly employed-the clinical test for sensory integration in balance; however, it fails to induce postural instability to the level of SRV.

OBJECTIVE

Determine if Stroboscopic vision (SV), characterized by intermittent visual blocking, may provide an alternative to the SRV for assessing postural stability.

DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

SETTING

Research laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighteen participants (9 males, 9 females; age = 22.1 [2.1] y, height = 169.8 [8.5] cm, weight = 66.5 [10.6] kg).

INTERVENTION

Participants completed the SOT conditions, and then repeated SOT conditions 2 and 5 with SV created by specialized eyewear.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A repeated-measures analysis of variance was completed on the time-to-boundary metrics of center-of-pressure excursion in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions in order to determine the difference between the full-vision, SV, and SRV conditions.

RESULTS

Postural stability with either SRV or SV was significantly worse than with full vision (P < .05), with no significant difference between SV and SRV (P > .05). Limits of agreement analysis revealed similar effects of SV and SRV except for unstable surface mediolateral time-to-boundary.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, SV was found to induce a degree of postural instability similar to that induced by SRV, indicating that SV could be a portable and relatively inexpensive alternative for the assessment of sensory dependence and reweighting.