Suppr超能文献

静脉注射利多卡因对老年结肠镜检查患者的异丙酚节省作用:一项随机、双盲、对照研究。

The propofol-sparing effect of intravenous lidocaine in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 109 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, 325027, China.

Department of Anesthesia and Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 May 30;20(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01049-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Propofol provides a prominent sedation effect in colonoscopy. However, anesthesia and sedation induced with propofol in the elderly might result in cardiopulmonary complications, especially when it is combined with opoids in the regimen. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the addition of intravenous lidocaine to propofol-based sedation could decrease the overall propofol requirement in elderly patients during colonoscopy while the procedural sedation satisfaction and the hemodynamic stability were not compromised.

METHODS

Ninety-two patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomly enrolled into lidocaine+propofol (L + P) group or normal saline+propofol (NS + P) groups. Subjects received intravenous bolus of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine followed by 4 mg kg h lidocaine continuous infusion in L + P group or equivalent volumes of normal saline for boluses and infusion in NS + P group. Anesthesia was induced with 2.5 μg sufentanil followed by injection of 1.2 mg kg propofol in all patients. A single supplemental bolus of 0.6 mg kg propofol was administered whenever MOAA/S score > 1 or had body movement during the colonoscopy. The recorded primary endpoints included: the total amount of propofol administered during entire procedure, the supplemental amount of propofol after induction, and the frequencies of boluses of supplemental propofol.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients were included in the final analysis. Compared with NS + P group, the total amounts of propofol (induction plus supplemental) were no significant differences in L + P group; however, the required supplemental propofol was less (69.9 ± 39.2 mg vs. 51.5 ± 38.6 mg) (P = 0.039); the average frequencies of boluses of supplemental propofol given after induction were lower (2.1 ± 1.1 vs. 1.4 ± 0.9) (P = 0.003); the calculated "unit propofol" infusion rate was lower (0.18 ± 0.05 vs. 0.14 ± 0.04 mg kg min) (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of intravenous lidocaine to propofol-based sedation resulted in a remarked reduction of supplemental propofol in the elderly during colonoscopy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The present clinical trial was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn on 11th March 2019 (registration No. ChiCTR1900021818).

摘要

背景

丙泊酚在结肠镜检查中提供突出的镇静作用。然而,在老年人中使用丙泊酚进行麻醉和镇静可能会导致心肺并发症,尤其是在该方案中与阿片类药物联合使用时。本研究旨在检验以下假设:在结肠镜检查期间,向丙泊酚镇静中添加静脉利多卡因可降低老年患者的总体丙泊酚需求,同时不会损害程序镇静满意度和血液动力学稳定性。

方法

92 名接受结肠镜检查的患者被随机纳入利多卡因+丙泊酚(L + P)组或生理盐水+丙泊酚(NS + P)组。在 L + P 组中,受试者接受 1.5mg/kg 静脉利多卡因推注,然后以 4mg/kg/h 的速度持续输注利多卡因,在 NS + P 组中,推注和输注等容量的生理盐水。所有患者均接受 2.5μg 舒芬太尼静脉推注,然后注射 1.2mg/kg 丙泊酚诱导麻醉。当 MOAA/S 评分>1 或在结肠镜检查期间出现身体运动时,给予 0.6mg/kg 丙泊酚的单次补充推注。记录的主要终点包括:整个过程中给予的丙泊酚总量、诱导后补充的丙泊酚量以及补充丙泊酚的推注频率。

结果

共有 79 名患者纳入最终分析。与 NS + P 组相比,L + P 组丙泊酚(诱导加补充)的总量无显著差异;然而,所需的补充丙泊酚较少(69.9 ± 39.2mg 比 51.5 ± 38.6mg)(P = 0.039);诱导后给予补充丙泊酚的平均推注频率较低(2.1 ± 1.1 次比 1.4 ± 0.9 次)(P = 0.003);计算的“单位丙泊酚”输注率较低(0.18 ± 0.05mg/kg/min 比 0.14 ± 0.04mg/kg/min)(P = 0.002)。

结论

在老年患者的结肠镜检查中,向丙泊酚镇静中添加静脉利多卡因可显著减少补充丙泊酚的用量。

试验注册

本临床试验于 2019 年 3 月 11 日在中国临床试验注册中心注册(注册号 ChiCTR1900021818)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c44/7260845/c385c3a20b30/12871_2020_1049_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验