Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Qc, Canada.
Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Neuroimage. 2020 Sep;218:116994. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116994. Epub 2020 May 29.
Visual object recognition seems to occur almost instantaneously. However, not only does it require hundreds of milliseconds of processing, but our eyes also typically fixate the object for hundreds of milliseconds. Consequently, information reaching our eyes at different moments is processed in the brain together. Moreover, information received at different moments during fixation is likely to be processed differently, notably because different features might be selectively attended at different moments. Here, we introduce a novel reverse correlation paradigm that allows us to uncover with millisecond precision the processing time course of specific information received on the retina at specific moments. Using faces as stimuli, we observed that processing at several electrodes and latencies was different depending on the moment at which information was received. Some of these variations were caused by a disruption occurring 160-200 ms after the face onset, suggesting a role of the N170 ERP component in gating information processing; others hinted at temporal compression and integration mechanisms. Importantly, the observed differences were not explained by simple adaptation or repetition priming, they were modulated by the task, and they were correlated with differences in behavior. These results suggest that top-down routines of information sampling are applied to the continuous visual input, even within a single eye fixation.
视觉物体识别似乎是瞬间发生的。然而,它不仅需要数百毫秒的处理时间,而且我们的眼睛通常也会将物体固定数百毫秒。因此,在不同时刻到达我们眼睛的信息在大脑中一起处理。此外,在注视过程中不同时刻接收到的信息很可能会被以不同的方式处理,特别是因为在不同的时刻可能会有选择地关注不同的特征。在这里,我们引入了一种新颖的反向相关范式,该范式允许我们以毫秒级的精度揭示在特定时刻从视网膜接收的特定信息的处理时间过程。我们使用面孔作为刺激,观察到在几个电极和潜伏期的处理因信息接收的时刻而异。这些变化中的一些是由面孔出现后 160-200 毫秒发生的中断引起的,这表明 N170 ERP 成分在门控信息处理中起作用;其他的则暗示了时间压缩和整合机制。重要的是,观察到的差异不能用简单的适应或重复启动来解释,它们受到任务的调节,并且与行为差异相关。这些结果表明,即使在单次眼动注视期间,自上而下的信息采样例程也会应用于连续的视觉输入。