• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

115 例保留神经的腹腔镜骶骨固定术的结果。

Outcomes of nerve-sparing laparoscopic sacropexy on one hundred fifteen cases.

机构信息

Baskent University Medical School Izmir Zubeyde Hanım Teaching Hospital, Turkey.

Baskent University Medical School Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Teaching Hospital, Turkey.

出版信息

J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Sep;49(7):101795. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101795. Epub 2020 May 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101795
PMID:32474191
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the postoperative anatomic and functional outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic nerve-sparing sacrocolpopexy or sacrocervicopexy for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) POP-Q stage III and IV apical prolapse, and to delineate the contributing factors for recurrence.

STUDY DESIGN AND CLASSIFICATION

The file records of patients who underwent sacropexy in the last five years were reviewed retrospectively and compared in terms of preoperative and postoperative anatomic findings and symptoms.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent laparoscopic nerve-sparing surgery for treatment of POP-Q Stage III and IV/prolapse of uterine or vaginal cuff were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Postoperative anatomic and functional outcomes were evaluated using POP-Q classification and urinary/anal function by questioning during visits.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 24.2 ± 17.6 months. Anatomic recovery was achieved in 104 (90.4 %) cases. Advanced age (≥70 years), longer duration of symptoms, and low body mass index were determined as parameters related to recurrence risk.

摘要

研究目的

评估接受腹腔镜下神经保留骶骨阴道固定术或骶骨宫颈固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂(POP)POP-Q 分期 III 期和 IV 期顶端脱垂患者的术后解剖和功能结果,并明确复发的相关因素。

研究设计和分类

回顾性分析了过去五年间接受骶骨固定术的患者的档案记录,并比较了术前和术后的解剖学发现和症状。

患者

纳入接受腹腔镜下神经保留手术治疗 POP-Q 分期 III 期和 IV 期/子宫或阴道袖套脱垂的患者。

干预措施

采用 POP-Q 分类评估术后解剖和功能结果,并在就诊时通过询问评估尿/肛门功能。

结果

平均随访时间为 24.2 ± 17.6 个月。104 例(90.4%)患者达到解剖学恢复。高龄(≥70 岁)、更长的症状持续时间和较低的体重指数被确定为与复发风险相关的参数。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of nerve-sparing laparoscopic sacropexy on one hundred fifteen cases.115 例保留神经的腹腔镜骶骨固定术的结果。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Sep;49(7):101795. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101795. Epub 2020 May 28.
2
Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.有子宫和无子宫的盆腔器官脱垂手术复发高风险患者术后1年的解剖学结局:一项比较腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术/宫颈固定术与阴道前路网状物的随机对照试验
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):545-555. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3702-7. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
3
Comparison of Different Laparoscopic Sacropexy Procedures for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis.不同腹腔镜骶骨固定术治疗重度子宫脱垂的比较:一项回顾性分析
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023 Apr;30(4):300-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.12.011. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
4
Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.香港华裔患者盆腔器官脱垂行腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术伴或不伴同期子宫切除术的临床结局及并发症:中位随访7年的结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jan;34(1):271-278. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05403-2. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
5
The effectiveness of two different laparoscopic surgeries for apical support of pelvic organ prolapse.两种不同腹腔镜手术对盆腔器官脱垂顶端支持的有效性
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 May;188:74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
6
[Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].经腹-经阴道联合入路腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗Ⅳ度盆腔器官脱垂的中期疗效
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Mar 25;54(3):160-165. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.03.004.
7
[Study on mesh-augmented vaginal reconstructive surgery in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse].[网状物增强阴道重建手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Feb;46(2):101-4.
8
Success rates and outcomes of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy.腹腔镜网片骶骨子宫固定术的成功率及结果
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Apr;60(2):244-249. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13104. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
9
[Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].[三种手术治疗重度盆腔器官脱垂的比较结果及生殖器脱垂复发危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Feb;46(2):94-100.
10
Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.比较经腹腔镜和机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术与既往同期子宫切除术的手术结局。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Feb;31(2):401-407. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04017-5. Epub 2019 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Pelvic anatomy in laparoscopic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: dissect your success.盆腔器官脱垂腹腔镜手术中的盆腔解剖:剖析你的成功之道。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2022 Dec;14(4):335-337. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.14.4.047.