Suppr超能文献

评估 SMFM 和 AFE 基金会提出的 4 项羊水栓塞诊断标准在单中心人群中的应用。

Evaluation of the 4 diagnosis criteria proposed by the SMFM and the AFE foundation for amniotic fluid embolism in a monocentric population.

机构信息

Maternité Port-Royal, AP-HP, APHP. Centre-Université de Paris, Paris, France(1).

Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Nov;49(9):101821. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101821. Epub 2020 May 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM) and the Amniotic Fluid Embolism Foundation have recently proposed four diagnostic criteria for amniotic fluid embolism (AFE): presence of (1) sudden cardiac arrest or both respiratory and hemodynamic collapse, and (2) biological disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC), and (3) absence of fever, and (4) clinical onset during labor or within 30 min of delivery. The objectives of our study were to describe the clinical presentation of women with a strong suspicion of AFE and to assess the validity of the four criteria proposed for AFE definition.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study including all patients with a strong suspicion of AFE who delivered between 2006 and 2018 at the Port Royal maternity unit, Paris. Strong suspicion of AFE was defined by a clinical presentation in favor of AFE associated with a biological pattern and/or autopsy result supporting AFE. The mention of AFE in files was essential to include the patients in our study. We estimated the incidence and mortality rate of AFE. Then, the presence of each of the four diagnosis criteria of the SMFM score was described, as well as the clinical and biological patterns.

RESULTS

Among the 54 140 women who delivered during the study period, 14 had a strong suspicion of AFE (0.03 %), accounting for 25.9/100 000 deliveries (95 %CI (12.3-39.5/100,000)). All women had biological tests or autopsy supporting the diagnosis of AFE. Six of 14 patients (43 %) presented with all the four diagnostic criteria of the SMFM definition. All 14 women presented a hemodynamic collapse, but respiratory symptoms were lacking in 8 patients (57 %); 71 % fulfilled the criterion of biological DIC, and all patients had a clinical coagulopathy and a massive postpartum hemorrhage. Absence of fever was lacking in three women. In addition, all patients presented premonitory symptoms such as neurological disorders or irreversible and inaugural fetal bradycardia.

CONCLUSION

The four SMFM diagnostic criteria were present in less than half of the women with a strong suspicion of AFE. We propose an alternative clinical and pragmatic definition to diagnose AFE, which has to be validated in the future. Early diagnosis of AFE based solely on clinical criteria can help clinicians anticipate the severity of the situation and optimize care.

摘要

目的

母胎医学会(SMFM)和羊水栓塞基金会最近提出了羊水栓塞(AFE)的四项诊断标准:(1)突然心脏骤停或呼吸和血流动力学同时崩溃,以及(2)生物弥散性血管内凝血(DIC),(3)无发热,以及(4)分娩期间或分娩后 30 分钟内出现临床症状。我们的研究目的是描述疑似 AFE 患者的临床表现,并评估 SMFM 提出的四项 AFE 定义标准的有效性。

材料和方法

我们进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2006 年至 2018 年在巴黎皇家港妇产医院分娩且疑似 AFE 的所有患者。疑似 AFE 的强烈提示由支持 AFE 的临床表现、生物模式和/或尸检结果组成。在文件中提及 AFE 是将患者纳入我们研究的必要条件。我们估计了 AFE 的发生率和死亡率。然后,描述了 SMFM 评分的四项诊断标准中的每一项,以及临床和生物学模式。

结果

在研究期间分娩的 54140 名妇女中,有 14 名强烈怀疑患有 AFE(0.03%),占分娩总数的 25.9/100000(95%CI(12.3-39.5/100000))。所有妇女均接受了支持 AFE 诊断的生物检测或尸检。14 名患者中有 6 名(43%)符合 SMFM 定义的四项诊断标准。所有 14 名患者均出现血流动力学崩溃,但 8 名患者(57%)无呼吸症状;71%符合生物 DIC 标准,所有患者均有临床凝血病和大量产后出血。有 3 名患者无发热。此外,所有患者均出现了前驱症状,如神经功能障碍或不可逆转和初始胎儿心动过缓。

结论

在强烈怀疑患有 AFE 的妇女中,符合 SMFM 四项诊断标准的不到一半。我们提出了一种替代的临床和实用的诊断 AFE 的定义,这需要在未来得到验证。仅基于临床标准早期诊断 AFE 可以帮助临床医生预测病情的严重程度,并优化护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验